по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophical Thought
Reference:

Unity in print of the early phenomenology
Mikhailov Igor' Anatol'evich

Senior Scientific Associate, Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences

109240, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Goncharnaya, 12, str.1

mihayyl.igor@rambler.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8728.2018.12.28407

Review date:

16-12-2018


Publish date:

25-12-2018


Abstract.

This article explores the establishment of German phenomenology as a collective research program.  The author carefully examines the role of Max Scheler in establishment of publishing program of phenomenologists: his efforts in popularization of phenomenology and response to the critics of phenomenology. It is also demonstrate that articulation by the editors of yearbook of the most general objectives of the publisher practically aligns with the tasks formulate back in 1907 by one of the mentors of Edmund Husserl – Carl Stumpf: it is necessary to create world of ideas, capable of encompassing the sciences on nature and spirits, which by the “power of conviction”, will subordinate the wide variety of scholars. The scientific novelty lies in the analysis of publications of the first periodical that united the researchers of Göttingen and Munich, “Yearbook on the Philosophy and Phenomenological Studies”. The author demonstrates that the aforementioned formulations anticipate both, Husserl’s idea of the regional ontologies, as well as the reflected in the “Philosophy as a Strict Science” (1911) representation on the role of philosophy in culture. Since the first years of its existences, the “Yearbook” becomes an important branch of the forming academic community, and quite rapidly turns into the battlefield for influence.

Keywords: methodology, culture, Stumpf, Heidegger, Scheler, science, Husserl, phenomenological movement, Phenomenology, psychology
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Sheler M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya / Per. s nem.; sost., A. V. Denezhkina. M.: Gnozis, 1994.
2.
Brentano Fr. Die Abkehr vom Nichtrealen. Bern; München: Franle Verl., 1966.
3.
Husserl E. Adolf Reinach. Ein Nachruf // Kantstudien. 1918. Bd. 23. S. 147–149.
4.
Husserl E. Erinnerungen an Franz Brentano // Franz Brentano. Zur Kenntnis seines Lebens und seiner Lehre. München: C.H. Beck, 1919. S. 153–167.
5.
Husserl E. Aufsätze und Vorträge (1911–1921) // Husserliana. Bd. XXV. Dordrecht, 1986.
6.
Husserl E. Briefwechsel // Husserliana. Dokumente. Dordrecht. 1994. Bd. III/2: Die Münchener Phänomenologen.
7.
Husserl E. Briefwechsel // Husserliana. Dokumente. Dordrecht. 1994. Bd. III/4.
8.
Husserl E. Phänomenologische Psychologie. Vorlesungen Sommersemester 1925 / Hg. v. W. Biemel // Husserliana. Bd. IX. Den Haag,1962.
9.
Husserl E. Zur Phänomenologie des inneren Zeitbewußtseins (1893—1917) / Hg. v. R. Boehm // Husserliana. Bd. X. Den Haag, 1966.
10.
Scheler M. Der Formalismus in der Ethik und die materiale Wertethik. Halle a.d.S., 1916.
11.
Cairns D. Conversation with Husserl and Fink. Den Haag, 1976.
12.
Ingarden R. Erinnerungen an Edmund Husserl. Den Haag, 1968.
13.
Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung. 1913. Bd. 1.
14.
Spiegelberg Η. The Phenomenological Movement. A Historical Introduction. Vol.1–2. Den Haag, 3d Ed. 1982.
15.
Stumpf C. Reden und Vorträge. Leipzig, 1910.
16.
Kurennoi V.A. K voprosu o vozniknovenii fenomenologicheskogo dvizheniya // Logos. 1999. № 11-12. S. 156–182.
17.
Kurennoi V.A. (2006). Filosofskii proekt «Logosa»: nemetskii i russkii kontekst // Logos v istorii evropeiskoi filosofii: proekt i pamyatnik. Sb. materialov pod red. N.S. Plotnikova. M., 2006. S. 13–72.
18.
Mikhailov I.A. Rannii Khaidegger. M., 1999.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website