Статья 'Онтология: «бытие и небытие» или «бытие и сущее»?' - журнал 'Философская мысль' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophical Thought
Reference:

Ontology: «Existence and Non-existence» or «Being and Essence»?

Prokhorov Mikhail Mikhailovich

Doctor of Philosophy

Professor, the department of History, Philosophy, Pedagogy and Psychology, Nizhny Novgorod State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering; Professor, Shuya Branch of Ivanovo State University

603053, Russia, Nizhegorodskaya oblast', g. Nizhnii Novgorod, ul. Il'inskaya, 65, kab. 223

mmpro@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2306-0174.2013.5.284

Review date:

17-04-2013


Publish date:

1-5-2013


Abstract.

Paper is the fourth in a series of "Being and history: the relationship and determination." It is devoted to the justification of not "being and / or non-existence," and the correlative of 'beings and things, "is the basis of all the other problems in the study of philosophical ontology, that of him, to play with the relationship-being and existence, formed a correlate of philosophy and Science, which reflects the reality of a being and existence.In the first chapter examined and explicated meaning correlativity categories of being and existence, is reflected in the correlation with the relative philosophy and science. It is shown that the reality can not be disclosed separately either science or philosophy. She played in the mind only their correlate or co-relation. In the second chapter of the article reveals the history and logic of relation of philosophy and science. Isolated and characterized the main types of relations, the dialectical interaction of philosophy and science. The author believes that all relevant to these types of "concepts" reproduce the co-relation of philosophy and science, but the concept of each match, so to speak, its own reality relationship of philosophy and science. Some are "on the surface", while others go in depth, up to the essence of the deepest order. Three types of relation of philosophy and science: antiinteraktsionizm, reductionism (two species) and the dialectical model of interaction. The third chapter of the characteristic of the philosophical foundations of science, in the fourth - The essence of the "philosophy of science". Finally, given the conclusions of the article.

Keywords: correlate, being - essence, philosophy - science, historilogic, anti-interactionism, reductionism, dialectic relation, foundation of science, scientific revolution, philosophy of science
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Khaidegger M. Chto zovetsya myshleniem? M., 2007, s. 278.
2.
Kutyrev V. A. Bytie ili nichto. SPb., 2009; Legoshin G.M. Filosofiya nichto i nulevogo mira: Nec plus ultra. Saratov, 2006; Sagatovskii V.N. Smert' ontologii?//Vestnik Rossiiskogo filosofskogo obshchestva, № 4(56), 2010, s. 91-96; Sartr Zh.-P. Bytie i nichto: Opyt fenomenologicheskoi ontologii. M., 2000; Solodukho N.M. Filosofiya nebytiya. Kazan', 2002.
3.
Sagatovskii V.N. Filosofskie kategorii. Ch. 1. Ontologiya. Avtorskii slovar'. SPb., 2011, s. 62.
4.
Zinov'ev A.A. Logicheskaya ontologiya//Zinov'ev A.A. Faktor ponimaniya. M., 2006, s. 42-47, 84-97.
5.
Lenin V.I. O znachenii voinstvuyushchego materializma// Lenin V.I. Poln. sobr. soch. T. 45..M., 1975, s. 23-33.
6.
Kutyrev V.A. O soyuze filosofii s religiei protiv svobody nauchnogo razuma//Kutyrev V.A. Estestvennoe i iskusstvennoe: bor'ba mirov. N. Novgorod, 1994, s. 177-190.
7.
Boldachev A.V. Novatsii. Suzhdeniya v rusle evolyutsionnoi paradigmy. SPBGU, 2007, s. 246.
8.
Aristotel'. Metafizika, 1051v5-9//Aristotel'. Sochineniya v chetyrekh tomakh. T. 1. M., 1976, s. 250.
9.
Nazaretyan A.P. Tsivilizatsionnye krizisy v kontekste Universal'noi istorii. M., 2001.
10.
Khaidegger M. Evropeiskii nigilizm//Khaidegger M. Vremya i bytie. Stat'i i vystupleniya. M., 1993, s. 117-11. Pavlenko A.N. Vozmozhnost' tekhniki. SPb., 2010, s. 162. 12. Kutyrev V.A. Filosofskii obraz nashego vremeni (bezzhiznennye miry postchelovechestva). Smolensk, 2006, s. 129. 13. Reale Dzh., Antiseri D. Zapadnaya filosofiya ot istokov do nashikh dnei. T. 2, Srednevekov'e. SPb., 1995, s. 272. 14. Prokhorov M.M Nauka, filosofiya i vtoroe osevoe vremya. Nizhnii Novgorod, 2012. 15. Boldachev A.V. Novatsii. Suzhdeniya v rusle evolyutsionnoi paradigmy. SPBGU, 2007. S. 8. 16. Lenin V.I. K voprosu o dialektike//Lenin V.I. Filosofskie tetradi. T. 29. M., 1973, s. 317. 17. Boldachev A.V. Novatsii. Suzhdeniya v rusle evolyutsionnoi paradigmy. SPBGU, 2007, s. 244. 18. Boldachev A.V. Novatsii. Suzhdeniya v rusle evolyutsionnoi paradigmy. SPBGU, 2007, s. 244-245. 19. Boldachev A.V. Novatsii. Suzhdeniya v rusle evolyutsionnoi paradigmy. SPBGU, 2007. S. 239. 20. Prokhorov M.M. Tekhnologicheskaya priroda religii. Nizhnii Novgorod, 2010. 21. Sagatovskii V.N. Konets ontologii? // Vestnik Rossiiskogo filosofskogo obshchestva. 2010. № 4(56), s. 92. 22. Viktor Aleksandrovich Shtoff i sovremennaya filosofiya nauki. SPb., 2007, s. 21. 23. Sviderskii V.I. Nekotorye voprosy dialektiki izmeneniya i razvitiya. M., 1965, s. 12-30. 24. Blansho M. Opyt-predel//Tanatografiya erosa. SPb., 1994, s. 63-78. 25. Gusserl' E. Idei k chistoi fenomenologii i fenomenologicheskoi filosofii. Kn. pervaya. M., 2009. S. 100-101. 26. Sergeev K.A., Slinin Ya.A. Priroda i razum: Antichnaya paradigma. L., 1991, s. 3-5, 236-239. 27. Stepin V.S. Klassika, neklassika, postneklassika: kriterii razlicheniya // Postneklassika: filosofiya, nauka, kul'tura: Kollektivnaya monografiya/otv. red. L.P. Kiyashchenko i V.S. Stepin. SPb., 2009, s. 264. 28. Stepin V.S. Klassika, neklassika, postneklassika: kriterii razlicheniya // Postneklassika: filosofiya, nauka, kul'tura: Kollektivnaya monografiya/otv. red. L.P. Kiyashchenko i V.S. Stepin. SPb., 2009, s. 267-268. 29. Lebedev S.A. vzaimosvyaz' filosofii i nauki. Predmet filosofii nauki // Osnovy filosofii nauki / pod red. prof. S.A. Lebedeva. M., 2005, s. 8-45; Filosofiya nauki/pod red. prof. S.A. Lebedeva. M., 2007, s. 645-680. 30. Rassel B. Istoriya zapadnoi filosofii. Rostov-na-Donu, 1998. S. 6. 31. Prokhorov M.M. Filosofiya i simulirovanie // Vestnik Rossiiskogo filosofskogo obshchestva. 2008. № 4(48)? c. 111-114. 32. Marks K., Engel's F. Sochineniya. T. 20. M., 1961, c. 92. 33. Solodukho N. M. Gomogenno-geterogennyi podkhod v strukture gomogeterogeniki. Kazan', 2006, s. 19-20. 34. Solodukho N. M. Gomogenno-geterogennyi podkhod v strukture gomogeterogeniki. Kazan', 2006, s. 2-21.
11.
E.A. Samarskaya. Politika v industrial'nom obshchestve: A. de Sen-Simon i P.-Zh. Prudon // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2010. – № 6. – S. 104-107.
12.
M.M. Akilova. K voprosu o kategoriyakh chasti i tselogo i ikh dialektiki // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2010. – № 5. – S. 104-107.
13.
Kerimov D.A., Kerimov A.D.. Metodologiya prava v kontekste vseobshchei metodologii poznaniya // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2009. – № 11.
14.
N.P. Koptseva, V.S. Luzan. Modelirovanie kul'tury i kul'turnoi politiki v russkoi filosofii kontsa XIX — pervoi treti XX vv. // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2012. – № 4. – S. 104-107.
15.
M.M. Prokhorov. Istoriya, kul'tura opredeleniya bytiya i gumanizma // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2012. – № 2. – S. 104-107.
16.
T. A. Shebzukhova, N. G. Bondarenko. Moral'no-pravovye i politicheskie aspekty svobody v kontekste printsipa determinizma // Pravo i politika. – 2011. – № 12. – S. 104-107.
17.
D. A. Kerimov, A. D. Kerimov. O gosudarstvovedenii i ego metodologii // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2011. – № 11. – S. 104-107.
18.
V.N. Gulyaikhin. Dialekticheskaya vzaimosvyaz' estestvennogo i pozitivnogo prava kak faktor pravovoi sotsializatsii cheloveka // Pravo i politika. – 2010. – № 8
19.
M.M. Prokhorov Istoriya, kul'tura opredeleniya bytiya i gumanizma // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2012.-2.-C. 51-61.
20.
M.M. Akilova K voprosu o kategoriyakh chasti i tselogo i ikh dialektiki // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2010.-5.-C. 40-49.
21.
N.P. Koptseva, V.S. Luzan Modelirovanie kul'tury i kul'turnoi politiki v russkoi filosofii kontsa XIX — pervoi treti XX vv. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2012.-4.-C. 105-116
22.
Shipovalova L.V. Ob''ektivnost' kak nauchnaya tsennost'. Ili o vozmozhnosti nauki kak elementa kul'tury. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2014.-1.-C. 12-19. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2014.1.10401.
23.
Gurevich P.S. Formirovanie novoi paradigmy // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika.-2013.-12.-C. 1191-1999. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2013.12.10477.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website