Imitation of truth and nature of philosophy
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophical Thought
Reference:

Imitation of truth and nature of philosophy
Prokhorov Mikhail Mikhailovich

Doctor of Philosophy

Professor, the department of History, Philosophy, Pedagogy and Psychology, Nizhny Novgorod State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering; Professor, Shuya Branch of Ivanovo State University

603053, Russia, Nizhegorodskaya oblast', g. Nizhnii Novgorod, ul. Il'inskaya, 65, kab. 223

mmpro@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8728.2018.11.27943

Review date:

07-11-2018


Publish date:

20-11-2018


Abstract.

The subject of this research is the nature of philosophy. It is proved that in identifying the nature of philosophy, one must consider exceeding the boundaries of cognition; then, the truth, lie and delusion ad the forms of knowledge are opposed to stimulation and imitation of truth. The author analyzes the concepts of the national and Western thinkers interpreted in the context of the antipode of truth and its imitation, which clarifies the nature of philosophy in the context of ontology, gnoseology and ontognoseology. Such approach allows getting an extended idea on the history of philosophical thought. The significant historical-philosophical material for the research of the nature of philosophy are the concepts of G. Berkley, B. Russell, K. Jaspers, J. Ortega y Gasset, M. Heidegger, as well as substantial positions of Russian philosophers interpreted not only in the context of truth and lie, but also the antipodes of truth and its imitations. It is stated that viewing the knowledge only in dynamic of correlation between truth and lie/delusion is insufficient. In revealing the nature of philosophy, it is necessary to consider exceeding the boundaries of cognition. Then the forms of knowledge are contradistinguished to simulation, imitation of truth, and perception of the history of philosophy becomes fuller.

Keywords: hypostasis, imitation, forms of knowledge, ontognoseology, structure of the main issue, nature of philosophy, the science, philosophy, the law of specularity, being-real thing
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Alekseev P.V., Panin A.V. Filosofiya. 4 izd., pererab. i dop. M., 2013. S. 260.
2.
Boldachev A.V. Novatsii. Suzhdeniya v rusle evolyutsionnoi paradigmy. SPBGU, 2007. 256 s.
3.
Bekon F. Sochineniya v dvukh tomakh. T. 1. M., 1971. S. 239.
4.
Viktor Aleksandrovich Shtoff i sovremennaya filosofiya nauki. SPb.: Izd-vo SPbGU, 2007. 464 s.
5.
Voishvillo E.K., Degtyarev M.G. Logika. – M., Vlados-Press, 2001. S. 16-18.
6.
Dubrovskii D.I. Otnositel'noe i absolyutnoe // Relyativizm kak bolezn' sovremennoi filosofii. M.: Kanon, 2015. 41-60 s.
7.
Zinov'ev A.A. Faktor ponimaniya. M.: Algoritm, Eksmo, 2006. 528 s.
8.
Il'enkov E.V. Problema ideal'nogo // Voprosy filosofii, 1979, № 7. S. 150.
9.
Kara-Murza S. Poteryannyi razum. M.: Algoritm, 2005. 736 s.
10.
Kissel' M.A. Sud'ba staroi dilemmy (ratsionalizm i empirizm v burzhuaznoi filosofii XX veka). M.: Mysl', 1974. S. 3.
11.
Komarova V.Ya. Uchenie Zenona Eleiskogo: popytka rekonstruktsii sistemy argumentov. SPb.: Izd-vo LGU, 1988. 264 s.
12.
Kuchevskii V.B. Analiz kategorii «materiya». M.: Nauka, 1983. S. 42.
13.
Mozheiko M.A. Simulyakr // Postmodernizm. Entsiklopediya. – Mn.: Interpressservis; Knizhnyi Dom,2011. S. 727.
14.
Nikiforov A.L. Chto takoe «postneklassicheskaya nauka»? // Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. 2013. T. XXXVI, № 2, s. 63-64.
15.
Noveishii filosofskii slovar'. / Sost. Gritsanov A.A. Minsk: Izd-vo V.M. Skakun, 1998. 895 s.
16.
Ortega-i-Gasset Kh. Vokrug Galileya (skhema krizisov) // Ortega-i-Gasset Kh. Izbrannye trudy. M.: «Ves' mir», 1997. 233-404 s.
17.
Prokhorov M.M. Ontognoseologiya: aktual'nye aspekty vzaimootnosheniya ontologii i gnoseologii // Mirovozzrencheskaya paradigma v filosofii: Ontognoseologiya: Sbornik statei po materialam XIII Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii (N. Novgorod, NNGASU, 14 marta 2017 g.). – Nizhnii Novgorod: Izd-vo NNGASU, 2017. S. 6-14.
18.
Prokhorov M.M. Mirovozzrencheskaya samoidentifikatsiya cheloveka. Monografiya. N. Novgorod, 1998. Gl. 1.
19.
Prokhorov M.M. Ot ontologii i gnoseologii k ontognoseologii // Mirovozzrencheskaya paradigma v filosofii: Osnovopolozheniya ontognoseologii: monografiya / Pod red. prof. M.M. Prokhorova. – Nizhnii Novgorod: NNGASU, 2018. S. 16-34.
20.
Rassel B. Istoriya zapadnoi filosofii. Rostov-na-Donu: «Feniks», 1998. 992 s. s. 918.
21.
Rassel B. Pochemu ya ne khristianin. Izbrannye ateisticheskie proizvedeniya. M.: Politizdat, 1987. S. 37.
22.
Rassel B. Problemy filosofii. M.: Respublika, 2000. S. 180-187.
23.
Sagatovskii V.N. Konets ontologii? // Vestnik Rossiiskogo filosofskogo obshchestva. 2010. № 4(56) . S. 92.
24.
Sverguzov A.T. Nebytie kak ontologicheskaya kategoriya dialekticheskogo materializma. Kazan': KNITU, 2016. 104 s.
25.
Sviderskii V.I. Nekotorye voprosy dialektiki izmeneniya i razvitiya. M., 1965. S. 12-30.
26.
Slovar' inostrannykh slov. Izd. sed'moe. M.: Russkii yazyk, 1980. S. 134.
27.
Solodukho N.M. Filosofiya nebytiya v ochen' kratkom izlozhenii // Filosofiya. Yazyk. Poznanie: Sbornik materialov, posvyashchennykh 10-letiyu kafedry teoreticheskikh osnov kommunikatsii i yubileyu doktora filosofskikh nauk, professora E.V. Taisinoi / pod red. N.M. Mukharyamova, M.N. Zakamulinoi, O.B. Yanush. – Kazan', KGEU, 2011. 45-51 s.
28.
Solodukho N.M. Otnoshenie ontologii i metafiziki v kurse filosofii // Uchebnik filosofii: materialy 1-oi, 2-oi i 3-ei vserossiiskikh nauchno-metodicheskikh konferentsii (Kazan', 2006, 2007, 2008) Kazan': KGTlU, 2008. S. 302-303.
29.
Solodukho N.M. Filosofiya nebytiya. Kazan': KGTU, 2002. 146 s.
30.
Khaidegger M. Chto zovetsya myshleniem? M.: Akademicheskii proekt, 2007. 351 s.
31.
Shakhov M.A. Realizm kak obshchaya osnova religioznogo i nauchnogo znaniya // Voprosy filosofii. 2008. № 10. S. 73.
32.
Yaspers K. Smysl i naznachenie istorii. Per. s nem. 2-le izd. M.: Izd-vo «Respublika», 1994. 527 s.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website