Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

72 - !
. 72 DOI .
!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophical Thought
Reference:

Worldview prerequisites of the successful functioning of Galisons trading zones
Voronina Natalia

PhD in Philosophy

Docent, the department of Philosophy, Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod - National Research University

603950, Russia, Nizhegorodskaya oblast', g. Nizhnii Novgorod, pr. Gagarina, 23

voronina.nnov@yandex.ru
Tkachev Andrey

PhD in Philosophy

Docent, the department of Philosophy, Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod - National Research University

603950, Russia, Nizhegorodskaya oblast', g. Nizhnii Novgorod, pr. Gagarina, 23

andrey-tkacheff2015@yandex.ru

Article was received:

19-11-2018


Review date:

20-11-2018


Abstract.

He subject of this research is the impact of worldview representations in “trading zones” proposed by Peter Galison upon the development of interest in science and scientific communication. The authors determine the levels of formation of scientific interest, as well as reveals, that the representations in groups are the result of evident and latent concordance, where the latent plays the key role. The article considers the problem of successful and unsuccessful interaction in “trading zones”, and makes an attempt to identify the worldview nature of closeness and openness for the successful scientific cooperation. In the course of this work, the authors applied the general scientific methods along with the hermeneutic methodology for describing the worldview elements that affect the interest towards science. The scientific novelty lies in the suggestion to complement Christian List’s theory of judgment aggregation and Peter Galison’s concept of “trading zones” with consideration of the latent worldview elements that affect communication in the academic environment. At the same time, the authors determine certain specific worldview elements that influence the interest towards the scientific creativity and successful cooperation of scholars.

Keywords: worldview, Christian List, Peter Galison, aggregation, will to power, mediation, interest, the trading zone, research practices, science

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8728.2018.12.27896

Publish date:

21-11-2018


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Galison P. Zona obmena: koordinatsiya ubezhdenii i deistvii // Voprosy istorii estestvoznaniya i tekhniki. 2004. 1. S. 64 92.
2.
Collins H., Evans R., Gorman M. Trading zones and Interactional Expertise //Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. 2007. Part A. 38 (4). P. 657-666.
3.
Gorman, M. Trading Zones, Interactional Expertise, and Future Research in Cognitive Psychology of Science // Topics in Cognitive Science. 2010. 2(1). P. 96 100. DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01071.x
4.
Gorman, M. Trading zones, Normative Scenarios, and Service Science. / Handbook of Service Science. Springer, Boston, MA, 2010. pp. 665-675. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1628-0_29
5.
Thagard P. Being interdisciplinary: Trading zones in cognitive science // Interdisciplinary collaboration: An emerging cognitive science / S.J. Derry, C.D. Schunn, M.A. Gernsbacher (eds). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2005. (pp. 317-339)
6.
Khuan Syan Peredacha nauchnogo znaniya v zone obmena: iezuity-uchenye v Kitae (1582-1773) // Sotsial'nye i gumanitarnye nauki. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya literatura. Seriya 9: Vostokovedenie i afrikanistika. Referativnyi zhurnal. 2009. 2. S. 199-203.
7.
Dasgupta, D. Creating a Peripheral Trading Zone: Satyendra Nath Bose and BoseEinstein Statistics, Doing Science in the Role of an Outsider // International Studies in the Philosophy of Science. 2012. Vol. 26, No. 3. P. 259287. DOI: 10.1080/02698595.2012.731731
8.
Kasavin I.T. Zony obmena kak predmet sotsial'noi filosofii nauki // Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. 2017. T. 51. 1. S. 817. DOI: 10.5840/eps20175111
9.
Dorozhkin A.M. Problemy postroeniya i tipologii zon obmena //Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. 2017. T. 54. 4. S. 20-29. DOI: 10.5840/eps201754462
10.
Dorozhkin A.M. Filosof kak mediator // The Digital scholar: Philosophers Lab, 2018, Vol. 1, No. 2. S. 6-23. DOI: 10/5840/dspl20181213
11.
Stolyarova O.E. Skolkovo: arkhitekturnye zony obmena // Sotsiologiya nauki i tekhnologii. 4, 2013. S. 132-143.
12.
Shibarshina S.V. Sotsial'nye i gumanitarnye tsifrovye nauki kak mezhdistsiplinarnye zony obmena / V sbornike: Filosofiya v sovremennom mire. Sbornik nauchnykh dokladov mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii, posvyashchennoi 25-letiyu seminara Problema obosnovaniya znaniya i 70-letnemu yubileyu professora Kudryasheva Aleksandra Fedorovicha. 2017. S. 173-177.
13.
Kuznetsov A.G. Simvolicheskii interaktsionizm i aktorno-setevaya teoriya: tochki peresecheniya, puti raskhozhdeniya i zona obmena // Sotsiologiya vlasti. 2014. 1. S. 64-74
14.
Baranets N.G., Voronina N.N. Problemy mediatorov zon obmena //Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. 2017. T. 54. 4. S. 39-43. DOI: 10.5840/eps201754465
15.
Gutner G.B. Nauka v kontekste chelovecheskikh praktik. Konstruktivizm i evolyutsionnaya epistemologiya o nachale nauki // Voprosy filosofii. 2017. 7. S. 147-157.
16.
Yaspers K. Filosofiya. Kniga pervaya. Filosofskoe orientirovanie v mire M.: Kanon+ ROOI Reabilitatsiya, 2012. 384 s.
17.
Feierabend P. Protiv metoda. Ocherk anarkhistskoi teorii poznaniya. M.: AST: AST Moskva: Khranitel', 2008. 413 s.
18.
Dietrich F., List C. From Degrees of Belief to Binary Beliefs: Lessons from Judgment-Aggregation Theory // The Journal of Philosophy. 2018. Volume 115, Issue 5. − P. 225-270. DOI: 10.5840/jphil2018115516
19.
Galison, P. Trading with the Enemy // In Trading Zones and International Expertise: Creating New Kinds of Collaboration; ed. by Michael E. Gorman. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2010. P. 25-52.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website