' ' - '' - NotaBene.ru
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

72 - !
. 72 DOI .
!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Sociodynamics
Reference:

Technoscience and civil society

Bakanova Ekaterina Alekseevna

Post-graduate student, the department of Social Communications, National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University

634050, Russia, Tomskaya oblast', g. Tomsk, pr.Lenina, 30

katomba89@mail.ru

 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7144.2018.12.27709

Review date:

24-11-2018


Publish date:

09-01-2019


Abstract.

The relevance of this work is substantiated by the current significant transformations taking place in epistemological core of the modern science. It leads to the emergence of the new form of organization of scientific activity – technoscience, which is referred to as the “face of modern science” by Bruno Latour. Technoscience manifests as one of the key drivers of the development of civil society and its self-consciousness, contributing to the constructive civic engagement, as well as expansion of the context of human activity. Thus, the goal of this research becomes the examination of the phenomenon of technoscience and its impact upon the development of civil society. Having analyzed the works of the Russian and foreign scholars dedicated to the concept of technoscience, the author determines that it is a complicated interdisciplinary phenomenon nuanced with pragmatism, constructivism, externalism, political bias, pragmatic and social orientation. It is substantiated that the achievements of technoscience are included into the sociopolitical context; as well as demonstrated that the integration of such achievements, particularly the IT technologies, into the “fabrics of vital world” of the society actively influences the formation of civic initiatives, mindedness and principles. Therefore, the crowd technologies acquire new content, encouraging the development of civic engagement and strengthening of civic self-consciousness.

Keywords: information and communication technology, personality, information society, crowdsourcing, IT, politics, state, civil identity, civil society, technoscience
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Kasavin I.T. Kak vozmozhna politicheskaya filosofiya nauki? // Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. 2015. T. 45. 3. S. 5-15.
2.
Stepin V.S., Gorokhov V.G., Rozov M.A. Filosofiya nauki i tekhniki. Uchebnoe posobie. M.: KontaktAl'fa, 1995. 372 s.
3.
O Strategii nauchnotekhnologicheskogo razvitiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Elektronnyi resurs]: ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 01.12.2016 642. Dostup iz sprav.pravovoi sistemy Konsul'tantPlyus.
4.
Hottois G. Technosciences and ethics / Agazzi E. right, Wrong and Science. Ed. by Craig Dilworth. Poznań Studies in the Philosophy of Science and Humanities. AmsterdamNY, 2004. Vol. 81. R. 261265.
5.
Latur B. Nauka v deistvii: sleduya za uchenymi i inzhenerami vnutri obshchestva / per. s angl. K. Fedorovoi; nauch. red. S. Milyaeva. Spb.: Izdatel'stvo Evropeiskogo universiteta v SanktPeterburge, 2013. 414 s.
6.
BensaudeVincent V. Technoscience and Convergence: a Transmutation of Values? [Elektronnyi resurs] // Summerschool on Ethics of Converging Technologies. Germany. 2008. URL: https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00350804 (data obrashcheniya: 31.08.2018)
7.
Technoscience. The Politics of Interventions / Ed. by K. Asdal, B. Brenna, I. Moser. Norway: Oslo Academic Press, 2007. 351 p.
8.
Poznanie, ponimanie, konstruirovanie / Ros. akad. nauk, Int filosofii; otv. red. V.A. Lektorskii. M.: IFRAN, 2007. 167 s.
9.
Loeve S. From setting the distance to adjusting the focus [Elektronnyi resurs] // Metascience. 2012. P. 1-6. URL: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00741500/document (data obrashcheniya: 09.09.2018)
10.
Moiseeva A.P., Bakanova E.A. Fenomen tekhnonauki [Elektronnyi resurs] // Vestnik nauki Sibiri. 2017. T. 25. 2. S. 45-58. URL: http://sjs.tpu.ru/journal/article/view/1538/1023 (data obrashcheniya: 13.11.2018)
11.
Ot kommunikativnogo deistviya k praktikam dekonstruktsii v sovremennom obrazovanii: monografiya / pod obshch. red. E.V. Bataevoi. Khar'kov: Izdatel'stvovo NUA, 2017. 204 s.
12.
Nowotny H., Scott P., Gibbons M. Mode 2 Revisited: The New Production of Knowledge. Netherlands: Minerva 41, 2003. P. 179194.
13.
Tokvil' A.de. Demokratiya v Amerike / Aleksis de Tokvil'; per. s fr.; komment. V.T. Oleinikova. M.: Izdatel'stvo Ves' mir, 2000. 560 s.
14.
Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya / Int filosofii RAN, Natsional'nyi obshchestvennonauchnyi fond; red. V.S. Stepin [i dr.]. T. 1: AD. M.: Mysl', 2010. 741 s.
15.
Smorodinskaya N.V. Troinaya spiral' kak novaya matritsa ekonomicheskikh sistem // Innovatsii. 2011. 4. S. 66-78.
16.
Latour, B. Turning Around Politics. A Note on Gerard de Vries Paper // Social studies of science. 2007. Vol. 37. 5. P. 811820.
17.
Vaganov A.G. V poiskakh nauchnotekhnicheskoi politiki // Otechestvennye zapiski. 2002. 7. S. 181-188.
18.
Sotsiologiya veshchei. Sbornik statei / pod red. V. Vakhshtaina. M.: Izdatel'skii dom Territoriya budushchego, 2006. 392 s.
19.
VnukLipetskii E. Sotsiologiya publichnoi zhizni / E.VnukLipetskii, per. s pol'skogo E.G. Gendel'. M.: Mysl', 2012. 536 s.
20.
Argamakova A.A., Yashina A.V. Crowd science: issledovanie i preobrazovanie obshchestva cherez tekhnologii kraudsorsinga // Tsennosti i smysly. 2016. 5. S. 137-150.
21.
Putin V.V. Demokratiya i kachestvo gosudarstva // Kommersant'', 06.02.2012, 20/P (4805). S. 1.
22.
The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. World Development Report 2011: Conflict, Security, and Development [Elektronnyi resurs]. Washington. The World Bank. 2011. URL: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/4389 (data obrashcheniya: 02.09.2018)
23.
Gylfason T., Meuwese A. Digital Tools and the Derailment of Icelands New Constitution // CESifo Working Paper. 2016. No. 5997. 27 p.
24.
Bater R. Hope from below: composing the commons in Iceland [Elektronnyi resurs] // openDemocracy. 2011. URL: https://www.opendemocracy.net/richard-bater/hope-from-below-composing-commons-in-iceland (data obrashcheniya: 03.09.2018)
25.
Saunders C. Constitution making in the 21st century // International Review of Law. 2012. No. 4. P. 8.
26.
Keane J. Global civil society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. 220 p.
27.
Global Civil Society: Dimensions of the Nonprofit Sector // Ed. by L.M.Salamon, H.K. Anheier, R.List, St.Toepler, S. W.Sokolowski. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies, 1999. 511 p.
28.
Rotengatter V., Bruzelius N., Flivb'org B. Megaproekty i riski. Anatomiya ambitsii. M.: Al'pina Pabl., 2016. 288 s.
29.
Ivanov V.G. Global'noe grazhdanskoe obshchestvo: stanovlenie novogo aktora mirovoi politiki. Chast' 2 // Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov: seriya Politologiya. 2011. 1. S. 67-81.
30.
Meadows, D., Meadows, L. D., Randers J., William W. Behrens III. The Limits to Growth. New York: Universe Books, 1972. 205 p.
31.
Grebenshchikova E.G. Sotsiotekhnicheskie mnimosti tekhnonauki // Voprosy filosofii. 2018. 3. S. 59-67.
32.
Chulanova O.L. Sovremennye kraudtekhnologii: kraudsorsing, kraudfanding, kraudinvesting, kraudlending // Materialy Afanas'evskikh chtenii. 2017. T. 18. 1. S. 64-79.
33.
Tapscott D., Williams A.D. Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything. New York: Penguin Group, 2006. 314 p.
34.
Lektorskii V. A. Filosofiya, poznanie, kul'tura. M.: Kanon+ ROOI Reabilitatsiya, 2012. 384 s.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website