Сакральность Другого

Спектор Давид Михайлович

doi:10.7256/2454-0757.2019.9.27588


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > Requirements for publication > Peer-review process > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!

При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.

По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture

Reference:

Spektor D.M. — Sacredness of the Other // Philosophy and Culture. – 2019. – № 9. – P. 24 - 39. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2019.9.27588 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=27588

Sacredness of the Other

Spektor David Mikhailovich

PhD in Architecture

Docent, the department of Architecture, Moscow State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering

109451 Russia, Moscow, 3-ya Kabelnaya 1

daspektor@mail.ru

Другие публикации этого автора

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2019.9.27588

Review date:

04-10-2018

Publish date:

10-10-2019

Abstract.

The subject of this research is the sacred viewed as the experiences in its earthly orientation, in other words – “religion only within the boundaries of faith”. The research is based on monism of the will, identifies as motive that historically precedes “human” and one that formed the latter. Sacredness in light of the accepted paradigm is considered as one of the (dialectical) poles of the will, taken by metaphysics for the Unified (Good), by ontology – for being (Spirit, being within itself, being of the Other, etc.). Such paradigm defines the methodology for this study; within its framework is conducted gradual reduction of the “religious” to the initial feeling (obsession); in the context of this state, initiated by scarification, the author examines ontology of the will in its structural similarity with the being. The scientific novelty is substantiated by reconstruction of the circumstances of genesis and analytics of mechanism of “containment” of social being; for the first time “sacred” is introduced as a transcendental (dialectical) paradigm, prefacing givenness of one or another form of existence-realization (subject-object relation) with fight strategy for the position-subject at “starting point” of self-conditionality (freedom).
Keywords: will-to-power, Other, transgression, duty, faith, being-to-death, will, sacred, Unified, own
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References

1.	Bart K. Tserkovnaya dogmatika. Tom 1. M.: BVI. 2007. — 560 s.
2.	Bart K. Tolkovanie Poslanii k Rimlyanam i Filippiitsam. M.: Bibleisko-bogoslovskii institut sv. apostola Andreya. 2010. — khkhi + 306 s.
3.	Bart K. Tserkovnaya dogmatika. Tom 2. M.: BVI. 2011. — 712 s.
4.	Bart K. Tserkovnaya dogmatika. Tom IV (Seriya «Sovremennoe bogoslovie»). — M.: Bibleisko-bogoslovskii institut sv. apostola Andreya, 2015. — xxvi + 344 s.
5.	Batai Zh, Proklyataya chast': Sakral'naya sotsiologiya, M., Ladomir, 2006. — 742 s.
6.	Boevaya yarost' drevnikh, 261-276 // Gordeeva O.V. (sostavitel'). Izmenennye sostoyaniya soznaniya i kul'tura. Khrestomatiya — SPb.: Piter, 2009. — 336 s.
7.	Boltanski, L., Teveno, L. Kritika i obosnovanie spravedlivosti: Ocherki sotsiologi i gradov. — M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2013. — 576 s.
8.	Bul'tman R. Vera i ponimanie. M.: Rossiiskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya (ROSSPEN), 2004. — 752 s.
9.	Bul'tman R. Istoriya i eskhatologiya. Prisutstvie vechnosti. — M.: «Kanon 1» ROOI Reabilitatsiya, 2012. — 208 s.
10.	Burd'e P. Prakticheskii smysl. — SPb.: Aleteiya, 2001 g. — 562 s. — («Gallicinium»).
11.	Burkert V. Iz knigi «Homo Necans. Zhertvoprinoshenie v drevnegrecheskom rituale i mife», 405-480 // Zhertvoprinoshenie: Ritual v kul'ture i iskusstve ot drevnosti do nashikh dnei. M.: Yazyki russkoi kul'tury. 2000. — 536 s.
12.	Gordeeva O. V. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya teoriya L. S. Vygotskogo kak metodologicheskaya osnova izucheniya izmenennykh sostoyanii soznaniya (ISS), 62-78 // Gordeeva O.V. (sostavitel'). Izmenennye sostoyaniya soznaniya i kul'tura. Khrestomatiya — SPb.: Piter, 2009.-336 s.
13.	Delez Zh. Marsel' Prust i znaki / Laboratoriya metafizicheskikh issledovanii filosofskogo fakul'teta SPBGU. SPb: Aleteiya, 1999. — 190 s. (seriya "Metafizicheskie issledovaniya. Prilozhenie k al'manakhu")
14.	Zhirar R. «Nasilie i svyashchennoe»: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie; Moskva; 2000 – 400 c.
15.	Kaiua, Rozhe Mif i chelovek. Chelovek i sakral'noe. — M: OGI, 2003. — 296 s.
16.	Kant I. Religiya v predelakh tol'ko razuma // Immanuil Kant. Traktaty. SPb., 1996. — 552 s.
17.	Kant I. Lektsii o filosofskom uchenii o religii. M., 2016. — 384 s.
18.	Karmaikl Dzh. Razgadka proiskhozhdeniya khristianstva — Svetskaya versiya. M.: Respublika, 2002. — 431 s.
19.	Lorents K. Oborotnaya storona zerkala. – M.: Respublika. 1988. — 393 s.
20.	Lyubak A. Paradoks i taina tserkvi. — Knizhnyi mir ekumeny. 2012. — 144 s.
21.	Malamud Sh. Ispech' mir: ritual i mysl' v drevnei Indii — M. : Vost. Lit., 2005. — 350 s. — (Issledovaniya po fol'kloru i mifologii Vostoka)
22.	Markov B. V. Znaki bytiya. SPb: Nauka, 2001. — 562 s.
23.	Markov B. V. Chelovek, gosudarstvo i Bog v filosofii Nitsshe.— Spb.: «Vladimir Dal'», 2005. — 788 s.
24.	Nitsshe F. Rozhdenie tragedii, ili Ellinstvo i pessimizm // Nitsshe F. Soch. v 2 t. T. 1. — M.: Mysl'. 1996. — 832 s.
25.	Rabinovich E. I. Sny Probuzhdennykh: son i snovideniya v kul'ture, religii, politike Tibeta : monografiya. – Ekaterinburg : Gumanitarnyi universitet, 2013. – 200 s.
26.	Riker P. Konflikt interpretatsii. Ocherki o germenevtike. — M.: Akademicheskii Proekt, 2008. — 695 s. — (Filosofskie tekhnologii).
27.	Semenov Yu. I. Kak vozniklo chelovechestvo. M.: Gos. publ. ist. b-ka Rossii, 2002 — 790 s.
28.	Sloterdaik P. Sfery plyural'noi sferologii Tom III Pena — Spb, Nauka, 2010. — 928 s.
29.	Spektor D.M. U istokov istorii: rozhdenie rituala: Monografiya. – Ust'-Kamenogorsk, 2016. – 186 s.
30.	Spektor D.M.. Prednaznachenie komicheskogo. // Litera.-2015.-№ 3. s.143-224
31.	Spektor D.M. K ontologii tragicheskogo deistviya // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. — 2015.-№ 6.-S.658-668.
32.	Tart Ch. Izmenennye sostoyaniya soznaniya. — M.: Izd-vo Eksmo, 2003. — 288 s.
33.	Tennis F./ Ferdinand Tönnies Obshchnost' i obshchestvo. Osnovnye ponyatiya chistoi sotsiologii/ Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft. SPb: Vladimir Dal', 2002. — 452 s.
34.	Tillikh P. Sistematicheskaya teologiya-Toma 1-2-Razum i otkrovenie-Bytie i Bog. M.; SPb.: Universitetskaya kniga, 2000. — 463 s.
35.	Φreidenberg O. M. Mif i literatura drevnosti. M., 1998. — 800 s. (Issledovaniya po fol'kloru i mifologii Vostoka)
36.	Khaksli O. Rai i ad, 121-140 // Gordeeva O.V. Izmenennye sostoyaniya soznaniya i kul'tura. Khrestomatiya — SPb.: Piter, 2009. — 336 s.
37.	Eliade M. Tainye obshchestva. Obryady initsiatsii i posvyashcheniya. M. — SPb.: Universitetskaya kniga, 1999. — 356 str.
38.	Yunger F. G. Yazyk i myshlenie. S-Pb: Nauka, 2005. — 304 s.
39.	La Barre W. Hallucinogens and the Shamanic Origins of Religion // Flesh of the Gods / P.T.Fürst (Ed.). New York, 1972.
40.	Mühlmann H. Die Natur der Kulturen. Eine kulturgenetische Theorie. Heidelberg; New York, 1996.
41.	Ricoeur P. Methode et tache d'une phenomenologie de la volonte // Problemes actuels de la phenomenologie. P., 1952.
42.	Siskind J. To Hunt in the Morning. New York, 1973.
43.	Vernant J.-P., Vidal-Naquet P. Mythe et tragédie en Grèce ancienne. P., 1972.

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.