Статья 'Концепция материальной эпистемологии Д.Беэрда' - журнал 'Философская мысль' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophical Thought
Reference:

The concept of D. Baird’s material epistemology

Baeva Angelina

Post-graduate student, the department of Ontology and Theory of Cognition, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University

119234, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Leninskie Gory, 1

a-baeva93@mail.ru

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8728.2018.8.27131

Review date:

14-08-2018


Publish date:

26-08-2018


Abstract: This article makes an attempt to reconstructs the main positions of the concept of material epistemology of the contemporary scholar D. Baird on the example of his book “Thing knowledge: A Philosophy of Scientific Instruments”. In modern scientific research, knowledge is understood as a homogenous field of propositional forms of perception, but rather a heterogeneous field of dynamic elements existing in the nonlinear and historically variable relations of coordination. Renunciation of the attempt to describe science as a whole leads, on one hand, to elimination of the problem of searching for the unified foundation of scientific knowledge allowing to focus on the particular scientific practices, namely laboratory practices, which are not reduced only to propositional form of the perception of knowledge. On the other hand, such renunciation problematizes the sociocultural factors of the formation of scientific knowledge. Instrumental realization of theoretical constructs becomes an intrinsic part of experimental science of Modern History: new equipment and technologies ensure science with actions that are not subordinate to nature beyond the tuned optics. Baird’s concept of material epistemology is based on the idea about knowledge that belongs to the thing themselves: equipment and instruments of scientific knowledge. This materialized knowledge defies the propositional description similar to the practices of the formation of knowledge. In terms of radical augmentation of the research objects and increase of the orders of reflection, instrumental epistemology becomes inseparable with the material ontology, perceiving the “thing knowledge” as a certain research artifact.


Keywords: actions, extended knowledge, tacit knowledge, laboratory practices, thing knowledge, material epistemology, history of science, scientific instruments, technologies, artifact
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Latur B. Novogo vremeni ne bylo. Esse po simmetrichnoi antropologii. – SPb., 2006.
2.
Polani M. Lichnostnoe znanie. Na puti k postkriticheskoi filosofii. – M., 1985.
3.
Popper K. Logika i rost nauchnogo znaniya. – M., 1983.
4.
Khaking Ya. Predstavlenie i vmeshatel'stvo. Vvedenie v filosofiyu estestvennykh nauk. – M., 1998.
5.
Baird D. Thing knowledge: A Philosophy of Scientific Instruments. – Berkeley, 2004.
6.
Latour B., Woolgar S. Laboratory Life. The Construction of Scientific Facts. – Princeton, New Jersey, 1986.
7.
Sismondo S. An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies. – UK, 2010.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website