Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > List of peer reviewers > Review procedure > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

В погоне за двумя зайцами поймай обоих сразу!
34 журнала издательства NOTA BENE входят одновременно и в ERIH PLUS, и в перечень изданий ВАК
При необходимости автору может быть предоставлена услуга срочной или сверхсрочной публикации!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Once again about the faith, mind and competence of science, or a F. M. Dostoyevsky’s philosophical essay about a bedbug
Mekhed Gleb Nikolaevich

PhD in Philosophy

Docent, the department of Philosophy, the faculty of Social and Humanitarian Sciences, Bauman Moscow State Technical University

105082, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Rubtsovskaya Nab., 2/18, of. 733

Другие публикации этого автора

Mekhed Nikolai Grigor'evich

PhD in Philosophy

Deputy Director-General, National Fuel Company LLC

107078, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Sadovaya-Chernogryazskaya, 8/1



The subject of this article is a small chapter from the preparatory materials to Dostoevsky’s novel “Demons”, which in the authors’ opinion is a completed philosophical essay. This chapter, which lead character becomes a regular bedbug, represents value not only as a visual illustration that cracks a door into the creative laboratory of a prominent Russian writer and demonstrates the specific features of this artistic-philosophical method, but also as an imagery-symbolic insight or anticipation of the questions that engrosses the modern philosophy of mind. Particularly, reasoning on the limits and boundaries of the contemporary to Dostoevsky science, through his characters he questions: “what it is like to be a bedbug?” Those who at least merely familiar with the current situation within the philosophy of mind is bound to feel the close relation of similar wording with the famous article by T. Nagel “what it is like to be a bat?”, where this question and obvious failure of sensible answer from the third-person perspective, is used as a demonstration of non-reduction and fundamentality of the first-person perspective, and this the fundamental limitation of science.

Keywords: aesthetics, ethics, Demons, Dostoevsky, philosophy, religion, fiction, rationality, Nagel, misterianism



Article was received:


Review date:


Publish date:


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

Bakhtin M. M. Problemy tvorchestva Dostoevskogo. Kiev: Next, 1994. S. 9-179.
Dostoevskii F.M. Besy. Podgotovitel'nye materialy. // F.M. Dostoevskii. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii v 30 t. T. 11. L.: Izdatel'stvo «Nauka», 1974. S. 64-308.
Laut R. Filosofiya Dostoevskogo v sistematicheskom izlozhenii. M.: «Respublika», 1996. 447 s.
Lipskii B.I. Prakticheskaya priroda istiny. L.: Izdatel'stvo Leningradskogo universiteta, 1988. 152 s.
Mekhed G.N. Khudozhestvennaya literatura kak metod filosofii // Filosofskaya mysl'. — 2016.-№ 12.-S.23-35. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8728.2016.12.2148. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_21483.html
Nagel' T. Kakovo byt' letuchei mysh'yu? // Khofshtadter D., Dennet D. Glaz razuma. Samara: Izdatel'skii Dom «Bakhrakh-M», 2003. S. 349-360.
Flanagan O. Conciousness Reconsidered. Cambridge, London: The MIT Press, 1992. 241 p.
Mekhed N.G. Artistic Creations as Objects of Ethical Research: The Works Of Dostoevsky // Soviet Studies In Philosophy. – 1987.-№4. P. 65-86.
McGinn C. The Character of Mind. Oxford, New-York: Oxford University Press, 1996. 176 p.
Nagel T. The View From Nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986. 244 p.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.

Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website