Герменевтика Аристотеля как онто-логика

Клецкин Михаил Васильевич

doi:10.25136/2409-8728.2018.9.24733


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Philosophical Thought

Reference:

Kletskin M.V. — Hermeneutics of Aristotle as onto-logics // Philosophical Thought. – 2018. – № 9. – P. 45 - 56. DOI: 10.25136/2409-8728.2018.9.24733 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=24733

Hermeneutics of Aristotle as onto-logics

Kletskin Mikhail Vasil'evich

PhD in Philosophy

N/A

443080, Russia, Samara, Sanfirovoy Street 99

samkoms@mail.ru

Другие публикации этого автора

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8728.2018.9.24733

Review date:

15-11-2017

Publish date:

21-09-2018

Abstract: The subject of this research is the hermeneutics of Aristotle and apprehension of the place of modal logics within the structure of fundamental ontology. The author determines the difficulties and contradictions that faces the interpretation of Aristotle’s concept of the logics of nature, analyzes the correlation between the modal categories of “necessity”, “opportunity”, “truth”, and “reality”, as well as suggests the praxeological model of their unification. The reality implies materialization and necessity, but necessary is not always true, as it can also mean something compulsory outside the actual existence. It is also stated that without the temporal characteristics of the modality of existence are irrelevant, as the veracity of modal reasoning about anything is always viewed in present “as it is”. The author comes to a conclusion that the truth reveals the essential as valuable and always from the value (practical) perspective. Having analyzed the foundations of the modern analytical philosophy, the article demonstrates that the representations of logicians are defined by their ontological orientations. If in “Hermeneutics” Aristotle spoke about the existence as a whole, the logicians-analytics imply the existence of a particular sensual thing, i.e. the actual being, which narrows down the area of application of their “modal” logics.

Keywords: possibility, analytical philosophy, necessity, Aristotle, essential, truth, hermeneutics, Carnap, reality, consciousness
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References

1.	Aristotel'. Sobr. soch. v 4-kh tomakh. T. 2. – M.: Mysl', 1978. – 687 s.
2.	Akhutin A. V. Antichnye nachala filosofii. – SPb.: Nauka, 2007. – 784 s.
3.	Vol'f M. N. Standartnaya angloyazychnaya interpretatsiya ucheniya Parmenida // Vestnik NGU. Seriya: Filosofiya. – 2009. T. 7. vyp. 2. – S. 96-105. ISSN 1818-796X.
4.	Karnap R. Znachenie i neobkhodimost'. Issledovanie po semantike i modal'noi logike. – M.: Izd. inostr. literatury, 1959. – 384 s.
5.	Kletskin M. V. Bytie sushchego // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. – 2016. – № 5 (67). – S. 106-108.
6.	Kletskin M. V. Bytiinaya predstavlennost' sushchego // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. – 2016. – № 3-2. – S. 81-83.
7.	Kletskin M. V. Interpretatsiya tsennostnogo otnosheniya v antichnosti i v Novoe vremya // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2016. – № 12. – S. 1654-1663. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2016.12.18120
8.	Kletskin M. V. Tsennostnoe otnoshenie v nauchnom poznanii // Izvestiya Ural'skogo federal'nogo universiteta. Seriya 3: Obshchestvennye nauki. – 2016. – № 2 (152). – S. 49-59.
9.	Kletskin M. V. Tsennostnyi smysl kategorii «bytie» // Intellekt. Innovatsii. Investitsii. – 2016. – № 2. – S. 74-76.
10.	Kripke C. Tozhdestvo i neobkhodimost' // Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike. 1982. Vyp. XIII. S. 340-376.
11.	Lukasevich Ya. O printsipe protivorechiya u Aristotelya. Kriticheskoe issledovanie. – M.-SPb.: TsGI, 2012. – 256 s.
12.	Orlov E. V. Filosofskii yazyk Aristotelya. – Novosibirsk: Izd-vo SO RAN, 2011. – 317 s.
13.	Fasmer M. Etimologicheskii slovar' russkogo yazyka. V 4-kh t. T.3. – M.: Progress, 1987. – 832 s.
14.	Khaidegger Μ. Osnovnye problemy fenomenologii. – SPb.: Vysshaya religiozno-filosofskaya shkola, 2001. – 446 s.
15.	Khaidegger M. Bytie i vremya / Per. s nem. V.V. Bibikhina. – Khar'kov: Folio, 2003. – 503 s.
16.	Chernyakov A. G. Ontologiya vremeni. Bytie i vremya v filosofii Aristotelya, Gusserlya i Khaideggera. – SPb.: Vysshaya religiozno-filosofskaya shkola, 2001. – 460s.
17.	Aristotelis Analytica priora et posteriora / Ed. by W.D. Ross. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1964.
18.	Aristotelis categoriae et liber de interpretatione / Ed. L. Minio-Paluello. – Oxford, 1966.
19.	Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics / Tr. by D.W. Ross // [23]. Vol. 9. P. 339–444.
20.	Aristotle’s metaphysics, 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970.
21.	Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker: In 2 vols. in 3. / Ed. H. Diels, supplement W. Kranz. Berlin: Weidmann, 1906–1910.
22.	Kahn Ch. The Greek Verb «To Be» and the Concept of Being / Foundations of Language, Vol. 2, No. 3 (Aug., 1966), pp. 245-265
23.	The Works of Aristotle: Vol. 1–2 // Great Books of Western World. Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. 1952. Vol. 8–9

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.