Статья 'Veritas non auctoritas facit legem* (о развитии понятия публичной сферы у Ю. Хабермаса) ' - журнал 'Философская мысль' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophical Thought
Reference:

Veritas non auctoritas facit legem* (on evolution of the concept of public sphere of J. Habermas

Parkhomenko Roman Nikolaevich

Doctor of Philosophy

Docent, the department of Philosophy and Culturology, Russian University of Transport

127994, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Obraztsova, d. 9, str. 9

parkhomenkor@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8728.2018.4.24072

Review date:

03-09-2017


Publish date:

21-04-2018


Abstract: The subject of this research is the concept of political public sphere considered in the works of J. Habermas. The article traces the emergence of the phenomenon of political publicity, which in Habermas’ opinion, initially appears as a requirement of the developing economy of Western countries. The political public sphere affected the formation of Anglo-Saxon model of the state that implied the primate of law and rational reasoning, as well as public discussion of the relevant economic and political questions. In accordance with the indicated paradigm of political thoughts, the appropriate in the state must coincide with the just. Methodology lies in examination of the works of Habermas, including the untranslated into the Russian language and relatively unknown in Russia. The main conclusion consists in the statement that Habermas believes that the legislation in democratic state must represent not a result of political will, but based on the rational agreement of all actors of the free market. Public sphere, therewith, is called to bring more transparency into the democratic process of decision-making in the state.


Keywords: Habermas, power, law, democracy, liberalism, state, public sphere, policy, society, philosophy
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Хабермас Ю. Структурное изменение публичной сферы: исследования относительно категории буржуазного общества. М.: Весь мир, 2016. 342 с.
2.
Волгин В.П. Развитие общественной мысли во Франции в VXIII веке. М.: Издательство Академии Наук СССР, 1958. 416 с.
3.
Locke J. Two Treaties of Civil Government. London, 1953. 216 p.
4.
Parliamentary History. London, 1817. 1574 p.
5.
Hartung F. (Hg.) Die Entwicklung der Menschen-und Bürgerrechte. Göttingen, 1954.
6.
Мусихин Г.И. Власть перед вызовом современности: сравнительный анализ российского и немецкого опыта конца XVIII – начала XX веков. СПб.: Алетейя, 2004. 288 с.
7.
Müller A. Die Elemente der Staatkunst. Auszüge // Elm L. (Hg.) Konservatives Denken, 1789-1848/49. Darstellungen und Texte. Berlin, 1989. 564 S.
8.
Хабермас Ю. Ах, Европа. Небольшие политические сочинения, XI. М.: Весь мир, 2012. 160 с.
9.
Салмин А.М. Современная демократия: очерки становления и развития. М.: Форум, 2009. 384 с.
10.
Пантин И.К. (отв. ред.) Европейская политическая мысль XIX века. М.: Наука, 2008. 487 с.
11.
Galbraith J.K. American Capitalism. Boston, 1952. P. 31.
12.
Schmitt C. Verfassungslehre. Berlin, 1957. S. 148.
13.
Мюрберг И.И. Свобода в пространстве политического. Современные философские дискурсы. М.: Идея-Пресс, 2009. 236 с.
14.
Пархоменко Р.Н. Идея свободы в консервативной интеллектуальной традиции: Россия и Германия. М.: Ленанд, 2014. 296 с.
15.
Пархоменко Р.Н. Теория делиберативной демократии Ю. Хабермаса // Философия и культура. — 2012.-№ 4. С. 40-49.
16.
Пархоменко Р.Н. Дискурс, демократия, политическая публичность как составляющие германской нормативной концепции либерализма (Ю. Хабермас) // Философская мысль. — 2016.-№ 4. С.39-49.
17.
Kant I. Werke. Berlin 1922. Bd. IV. S. 389.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website