'Великий ледоход русской мысли': складывание двух традиций отечественной философии

Красиков Владимир Иванович

doi:10.25136/2409-8728.2017.7.23423


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!

При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.

По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Philosophical Thought

Reference:

Krasikov V.I. — "Great ice drift of the Russian thought": fusion of two traditions of the Russian philosophy // Philosophical Thought. – 2017. – № 7. – P. 75 - 87. DOI: 10.25136/2409-8728.2017.7.23423 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=23423

"Great ice drift of the Russian thought": fusion of two traditions of the Russian philosophy

Krasikov Vladimir Ivanovich

Doctor of Philosophy

Professor, Scientific Center, All-Russian State University of Justice

115184, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Bol'shaya Tatarskaya, 7, kv. 64

KrasVladIv@gmail.com

Другие публикации этого автора

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8728.2017.7.23423

Review date:

25-06-2017

Publish date:

19-07-2017

Abstract.

The goal of this article consists in examination of the dynamics of confrontation between two fractions of the Russian thought in the 1830’s – 1840’s: major “platforms” and most noticeable (focal) discussions, during the course of which have been discovered the publicly known leaders and their main ideas. The object of this article is the social and ideological clash that took place during this timeframe, while the subject is the intrigue and structure of this clash, which had formed the two opposing groups with the diametrically different theoretical platforms that have become the permanent characters of the Russian intellectual stage. The applied methodology leans on R. Collins' theory of "intellectual evolutions": the field of intellectual attention, focal discussions, and bloom of creativity through the opposition and rivalry. As the author believes, the examined theoretical collision for the first time has divided the intellectuals of two capitals into the groups, which formed their own stable consciousness, acquired historical genealogy, put forward the symbols of their group unity, dealt with succession, and supported the line of confrontation even up until now. The scientific novelty of the study lies in reviewing the dynamics of fraction genesis in the context of specificity of the three different discursive platforms of that time: secular saloons, university courses, and "journal wars”.
Keywords: fraction genesis, creativity through oppositions, journal wars, focal discussions, field of intellectual attention, Westernism, Slavophilism, radical and moderate, discussion areas, Russian self-identification
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References

1.	Gertsen A. I. Byloe i dumy. M.: SLOVO/SLOVO, 2001. 908 s.
2.	Mnemozina. Sobranie sochinenii v stikhakh i proze. Al'manakh V. F. Odoevskogo i V. K. Kyukhel'bekera. M., 1824. Ch. 4. S. 163. Tsit. po: Peskov A. M. U istokov russkogo filosofstvovaniya: shellingianskie tainstva lyubomudrov // Voprosy filosofii. 1994. № 5. S. 89-100.
3.	Annenkov P. V. Zamechatel'noe desyatiletie (1838–1848) // Gertsen v vospominaniyakh sovremennikov. M.: GIKhL, 1956. S.118-149.
4.	Burmistrov T. Rossiya i Zapad. Antologiya russkoi poezii. SPb., 2000. 407 s.
5.	Lektsii T.N. Granovskogo po istorii pozdnego srednevekov'ya (Granovskii T.N.) Sait Vsemirnaya istoriya. URL: http://historic.ru/books/item/f00/s00/z0000005/index.shtml (Data obrashcheniya 1.07.2017).
6.	Shevyrev S.P. Istoriya russkoi slovesnosti. Ch. 1, 2. Izd. 2-e. Sait Elektronnaya biblioteka "Nauchnoe nasledie Rossii". URL: http://e-heritage.ru/ras/view/publication/general.html?id=47410847 (Data obrashcheniya 1.07.2017).
7.	Chaadaev P.Ya. Filosoficheskie pis'ma. Sait Vekhi. URL: http://www.vehi.net/chaadaev/filpisma.html (Data obrashcheniya 1.07.2017).
8.	Khomyakov A. S. O starom i novom. Sait Literatura i zhizn'. URL: http://dugward.ru/library/nikolay1/homjakov_star_nov.html (Data obrashcheniya 2.07.2017).
9.	Kireevskii I. V otvet A. S. Khomyakovu. Sait Literatura i zhizn'. URL: http://dugward.ru/library/nikolay1/kireevskiy_otvet_hom.html (Data obrashcheniya 2.07.2017).
10.	Aksakov K. Ob osnovnykh nachalakh russkoi istorii. Sait Literatura i zhizn'. URL: http://dugward.ru/library/aksakovy/kaksakov_ob_osnovnyh_nachalah.html (Data obrashcheniya 2.07.2017).
11.	Shevyrev Stepan Petrovich. Sait Biografiya. Ru. Biograficheskaya entsiklopediya. URL: http://www.biografija.ru/biography/shevyrev-stepan-petrovich.htm (Data obrashcheniya 20.06.2017).
12.	Lotman Yu. M. Turgenev, Dostoevskii i literaturnaya polemika 1845 goda. Sait "K 90letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya Lidii Mikhailovny Lotman. URL: http://www.lotman.pushkinskijdom.ru/Default.aspx?tabid=5892 (Data obrashcheniya 20.06.2017).
13.	Belinskii V. Vybrannye mesta iz perepiski s druz'yami Nikolaya Gogolya. Spb. 1847. Sait Lib.ru. URL: http://az.lib.ru/b/belinskij_w_g/text_0260.shtml (Data obrashcheniya 1.07.2017).
14.	Khoruzhii S. S. Zhiznennyi mir Khomyakova i slavyanofil'skii etap ego tvorchestva // Sovremennye problemy pravoslavnogo mirosozertsaniya. URL: http://lib.eparhia-saratov.ru/books/21h/horuzhy/problems/4.html (Data obrashcheniya 22.06.2017).
15.	Sizemskaya I.N. Idei natsional'nogo messianizma: lovushki i pozitivnye osnovaniya istoriosofskoi refleksii // Filosofskaya mysl'. — 2013.-№ 6.-S.388-421. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.6.642. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_642.html (Data obrashcheniya 22.06.2017).
16.	Martynova O.A. Petr I i ego deyatel'nost' v filosofii rannikh slavyanofilov // Filosofskaya mysl'. — 2016.-№ 10.-S.63-70. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8728.2016.10.1830. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_18304.html (Data obrashcheniya 22.06.2017).
17.	Russkoe obshchestvo 40–50-kh godov XIX v. Ch. I. Zapiski A. I. Kosheleva. URL: https://gkaf.nsu.ru/readerhist10/koshelev.html (Data obrashcheniya 22.06.2017).
18.	Kavelin K.D. Nash umstvennyi stroi. Stat'i po filosofii russkoi istorii i kul'tury. M., 1989.-654 s.
19.	Sizemskaya I.N. A.I. Gertsen o variativnosti istoricheskogo protsessa // Filosofskaya mysl'. — 2013.-№ 3.-S.229-262. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.3.469. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_469.htm (Data obrashcheniya 23.06.2017).
20.	Lishaev S. A. Istoriya russkoi filosofii. Ch. I: S drevneishikh vremen do serediny XIX veka. Kurs lektsii. Samara: Samar. gumanit. akad., 2004. 274 s.
21.	Dostoevskii F.M. Dnevnik pisatelya. 1873. II. Starye lyudi // F.M. Dostoevskii. Sobranie sochinenii v 15 tomakh. SPb.: Nauka, 1994. T. 12. S. 9—14. Sait Russkaya virtual'naya biblioteka. URL: http://rvb.ru/dostoevski/01text/vol12/01journal_73/102.htm (Data obrashcheniya 23.06.2017).

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.