по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophical Thought
Reference:

Informal communication of the main philosophical groups in post-Soviet Russia
Krasikov Vladimir Ivanovich

Doctor of Philosophy

Professor, Scientific Center, All-Russian State University of Justice

115184, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Bol'shaya Tatarskaya, 7, kv. 64

KrasVladIv@gmail.com
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

Abstract.

The object of this research is the processes associates with the reformatting the worldview and spiritual situation and establishment of the new philosophical groups in post-Soviet thoughts during the late 1990’s and first decade of the XXI century. The subject of this work is the informal philosophical groups in post-Soviet Russia, their forming institutions, and history of relationship with the other intellectual groups. The author notices the roots of these newly established groups in the archetypical opposition between the Slavophiles and Westerners, examining the current worldview collisions as reproduction of this traditional to Russia conflict. The methodology of this research is based on the approach, according to which the network structure of the relationship between intellectual defines the generally meaningful space of intellectual attention that is divided into several competitive positions. The main results of this work consist in the following:


Description of the characterological reactions of intellectual upon the destruction of foundations of the previous discourse;


Brief description of history, theoretical peculiarities, composition, and institutional presentation of the six intellectual directions: phenomenology, postmodernism, neo-Marxism, gnoseology, analytics, and contextualists;


Characteristic of their stylistic specificities of self-expression and historical-philosophical roots;


Characteristic of turning points in communication of these groups with other similar institutions.


Keywords: epistemologists, postmodernism, neo-Marxism, phenomenology, Russian discourse, network approach, informal communication, post-Soviet philosophy, philosophers of science, analytical philosophers

DOI:

10.7256/2409-8728.2017.1.21610

Article was received:

04-01-2017


Review date:

06-01-2017


Publish date:

09-02-2017


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Filosofiya v postsovetskuyu epokhu i ugroza mass-media. Otkrytye seminary "Polit.ru". 01 fevralya 2008. URL: http://polit.ru/article/2008/02/01/seminar/ (Data dostupa: 30.12.2016).
2.
Stepin V.S. – Kasavin I.T. Filosofskie besedy: desyat' let spustya // Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki: Nauchno-teoreticheskii zhurnal po obshchei metodologii nauki, teorii poznaniya i kognitivnym naukam. 2014. № 3. T. XLI. S. 18-52.
3.
Syrov V.N. Massovaya kul'tura: Mify i real'nost'. M., 2010. 328 s.
4.
Podoroga V.A. Filosofskoe proizvedenie kak sobytie / Postmodernizm i kul'tura (materialy «kruglogo stola») // Voprosy filosofii. 1993. № 3. S. 56.
5.
Buzgalin A.V., Kolganov A.I. Sotsial'naya filosofiya postsovetskogo marksizma v Rossii: otvety na vyzovy XXI veka (tezisy k formirovaniyu nauchnoi shkoly) // Voprosy filosofii. 2005. № 9. S. 3–26.
6.
Buzgalin A.V. Sotsial'naya filosofiya KhKhI v.: renessans marksizma? // Voprosy filosofii. 2011. № 3. S. 36-48.
7.
Bol'shev A.O. Postmodernistskii imperializm peterburgskikh fundamentalistov (k voprosu o roli eklektiki v sovremennoi russkoi kul'ture) // Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni A.S. Pushkina. Ser. Filologiya. 2015. T. 1. № 02. Nauchnyi zhurnal. SPb.: LGU imeni A.S. Pushkina. S. 47-56.
8.
Postmodernizm i kul'tura (materialy «kruglogo stola») // Voprosy filosofii. 1993. № 3. S. 2-80.
9.
Istoriko-metodologicheskii seminar "Russkaya mysl'". RKhGA. URL: http://rhga.ru/science/conferences/rusm/ (Data dostupa: 03.01.2017).
10.
Tlostanova M. Sushchestvuet li postsovetskaya mysl'? O kolonial'nosti znaniya, vneshnem imperskom i dvoinom kolonial'nom razlichiyakh. 23.09.2015. Sait Gefter. URL: http://gefter.ru/archive/16006 (Data dostupa: 03.01.2017).
11.
Rozov N.S. Russkaya filosofiya v povorotakh istorii: fatal'na li periferiinost' // Filosofiya i obshchestvo. 2016. № 3. S. 96–115.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website