Статья 'Время и трансцендентальный субъект. Кант и Гегель' - журнал 'Философская мысль' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophical Thought
Reference:

Time and transcendental subject. Kant and Hegel

Spektor David Mikhailovich

PhD in Architecture

Docent, the department of Architecture, Moscow State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering

109451 Russia, Moscow, 3-ya Kabelnaya 1

daspektor@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8728.2017.10.20747

Review date:

16-10-2016


Publish date:

25-10-2017


Abstract.

 The subject of this research is the refinement of the concept of transcendental subject interpreted by Kant and Hegel, as well as the connection of this concept with the category of time. As demonstrated in the article, the initial prototype of its institutionalization is manifested by the "process" in duality of its interpretation, on one hand,  substantiated by technological invective, and on the other – by judicial allusions, which predetermined the implicit a priori of transcendental temporality, particularly, the principle of distancing from the incident, exclusion of reference from the composition explicitly-authentic, role of the procedure (codification) in its reconstruction, etc. The method of research is based on the analysis and reconstruction of the concepts of "time", "procedure" and "judicial proceedings" (substantiated in its unity, including the etymological closeness of the concepts of "history", "truth" and "the plaintiff"). The scientific novelty consist in revealing the relationship between "time" and "history" as the form and content of existence in terms of the German classical philosophy. It is shown that the efficiency of such dilution imposed high cost on philosophy: the concept of the transcendental subject and the categorical conceptual apparatus of dialectical logic have been acquired at the cost of loss by notion of time of the link with human being, assigning to the “transcendentality” of natural allusions that have yet to be overcome.

Keywords: history, plaintiff, conclusion, result, transcendental subject, process, proceedings, procedure, Time, truth
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Fuko M. Nadzirat' i nakazyvat'. M., 1999. s 330-331
2.
Riker P. Vremya i rasskaz. T. 1. Intriga i istoricheskii rasskaz. M.; SPb.: Universitetskaya kniga, 1998. s. 148
3.
Kant I. Kritika chistogo razuma. T. 3. M.: Choro, 1996. s. 64, 73.
4.
Kant I. Kritika chistogo razuma. Pg., 1915. s. 415-416.
5.
Kant I. Sochineniya. T. 2. M., Mysl', 1963. s. 407.
6.
Kant I. Sochineniya. T. 3. M., Mysl', 1964, s. 221.
7.
Borodai Yu.M. Erotika, smert', tabu: tragediya chelovecheskogo soznaniya. M.: Gnozis, Russkoe fenomenologicheskoe obshchestvo. 1996. s. 261-262
8.
Kant I. Sochineniya v 6 tomakh. T. 4, ch. 1. M., Mysl', 1965. S. 268.
9.
Kant I. Sobranie sochinenii v 8 t. M. : Choro, 1994. T. 3 : Kritika chistogo razuma. s. 583, 484, .
10.
Kalinnikov L. A. O nravotsentrichnosti transtsendental'noi antropologii Kanta, ili O roli morali v prirode cheloveka / L.A. Kalinnikov // Kant. sb. 2010. – № 34. S. 21–33.
11.
Trel'ch, E. Istorizm i ego problemy: logicheskie problemy filosofii istorii M. Yurist, 1994. s. 209-210, 23, 221.
12.
Khaidegger M. Bytie i vremya. M., “Ad Marginem”, 1997. s. 428-429, 430, 431, 434, 435.
13.
Gegel'. Entsiklopediya filosofskikh nauk. T. 2. Filosofiya prirody. Izd. Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoi literatury. M. 1975. s. 44, 45, 46, 50, 51, 52, 57-58.
14.
Gol'dman L. Lukach i Khaidegger. SPb. «Vladimir Dal'». 2009. s. 126
15.
Gegel' G. Entsiklopediya filosofskikh nauk. T. 1. M., Mysl', 1975. s. 156.
16.
Gegel' G. Entsiklopediya filosofskikh nauk. T. 3. M., Mysl', 1977. s. 366.
17.
Gegel' G. Fenomenologiya dukha. SPb. Nauka. 1992. s. 11.
18.
Gaidenko P.P. Vremya. Dlitel'nost'. Vechnost'. Problema vremeni v evropeiskoi filosofii i nauke. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2006. s. 294.
19.
Vindel'band V. Izbrannoe: Dukh i istoriya. M.: Yurist, 1995. s. 315.
20.
Gegel'. Filosofiya istorii. Soch. M.-L., 1935. T. 8. s. 40.
21.
Gegel' G. V. F. Fenomenologiya dukha. Soch. T. IV. M., 1959. s. 241-242.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website