Статья 'Битва за опыт: феноменология vs. эмпиризм' - журнал 'Философская мысль' - NotaBene.ru
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophical Thought

Battle for the experience: phenomenology vs. empiricism

Chubatov Andrey

Post-graduate student, the department of Logic, Saint Petersburg State University

199034, Russia, g. Saint Petersburg, ul. Mendeleevskaya Liniya, 5

Другие публикации этого автора




Review date:


Publish date:



The ultimate source of knowledge is the experience. Habitualness of this reasoning disturbs to think it over to the end. Being faithful to the experience in form of ἀρχή means for the philosophy the inability to find reliance in one or another theory. This leads to debunking of a myth, according to which the philosophy based on experience is empiricism (particularly, is thematized the mythology of “eternal subjects” and “sensations”). At the baseline of empiricism lies a certain theory of experience, rather than experience. The only breakthrough towards life experience within the framework of empiricism was realized by George Berkeley, but at the end, he also drowned in its personalistic metaphysics. In turn, philosophy faithful to experience, which preceded all of its theories, manifests in form of phenomenology, not only rejecting the composition of theories, but meticulously exfoliating the intergrown into the experience theoretical constructs, disaffiliating from the authority innumerous unconscious theories that silently predetermine our knowledge before we start using it. Namely such step allows heading from an opinion towards vision, from the theory in a modern sense of word towards the Greek θεωρία – contemplation. This turn received the most capacious reflection in the famous slogan “Back, to the things themselves”. Give things the ability to talk for themselves – that is what the philosophy is outlived by. Particularly the faithfulness to experience as the contact point with the world allows the things themselves to manifest for narration. Again, namely the ultimate faithfulness to the experience represents the key feature of phenomenology. Thus, this article can be considered as introduction to phenomenology.

Keywords: sensations, empiricism, θεωρία, theory, ἀρχή, experience, doubling of the world, phenomenology, lifeworld, things themselves
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

Dekart R. Sochineniya v dvukh tomakh. T. 1. M.: Mysl', 1989. S. 81.
Lapshin I. Empirizm // Entsiklopedicheskii slovar' Brokgauza i Efrona: v 86 tomakh // URL: http://www.vehi.net/brokgauz/
Rassel B. Chelovecheskoe poznanie: ego sfera i granitsy. M.: TERRA – Knizhnyi klub; Respublika, 2000. S. 484.
Khaidegger M. Chto eto takoe – filosofiya? // Voprosy filosofii. 1993. № 8. S. 113-123.
Lokk Dzh. Sochineniya v trekh tomakh. T. 3. M.: Mysl', 1985. 668 s.
Bekon F. Sochineniya v dvukh tomakh. T. 2. M.: Mysl', 1978. 592 s.
Berkli Dzh. Sochineniya. M.: Mysl', 2000. 560 s.
Khaidegger M. Prolegomeny k istorii ponyatiya vremeni. Tomsk: Vodolei, 1998. 384 s.
Yum D. Sochineniya v dvukh tomakh. T. 2. M.: Mysl', 1996. S. 16.
Ingarden R. Vvedenie v fenomenologiyu Edmunda Gusserlya. M.: Dom intellektual'noi knigi, 1999. 224 s.
Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya svobody // Berdyaev N.A. Sud'ba Rossii: Sochineniya. M.: EKSMO-Press; Khar'kov: Folio, 2000. S. 41-42.
Gusserl' E. Idei k chistoi fenomenologii i fenomenologicheskoi filosofii. Kniga pervaya. M.: Akademicheskii Proekt, 2009. 489 s.
Gusserl' E. Izbrannye raboty. M.: Territoriya budushchego, 2005. 464 s.
Gusserl' E. Kartezianskie razmyshleniya. SPb.: Nauka, 2001. 315 s.
Merlo-Ponti M. V zashchitu filosofii. M.: Izdatel'stvo gumanitarnoi literatury, 1996. S. 164.
Gusserl' E. Amsterdamskie doklady. Fenomenologicheskaya psikhologiya // Gusserl' E. Izbrannye raboty. M.: Territoriya budushchego, 2005. S. 318.
Gusserl' E. Krizis evropeiskikh nauk i transtsendental'naya fenomenologiya. M.: Vladimir Dal', 2004. S. 175.
Gusserl' E. Izbrannaya filosofskaya perepiska. M.: Fenomenologiya-Germenevtika, 2004. 310 s.
Shpigel'berg G. Fenomenologicheskoe dvizhenie. Istoricheskoe vvedenie. M.: Logos, 2002. S. 104.
Merlo-Ponti M. Fenomenologiya vospriyatiya. SPb.: Yuventa, Nauka, 1999. 608 s.
Heidegger M. Gesamtausgabe. Band 17. Einführung in die phänomenologische Forschung. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 2006. S. 1.
Borisov E.V. Fenomenologicheskii metod M. Khaideggera // Khaidegger M. Prolegomeny k istorii ponyatiya vremeni. Tomsk: Vodolei, 1998. S. 355.
Bogdanov K.A. Ocherki po antropologii molchaniya. Homo tacens. SPb.: RKhGI, 1998. S. 245.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.

Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website