Обращение: радикальное переосмысление радикализма символического обмена

Спектор Давид Михайлович

doi:10.7256/2409-8728.2017.1.18609


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!

При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.

По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Philosophical Thought

Reference:

Spektor D.M. — Reversibility: drastic reassessment of radicalism of the symbolic exchange // Philosophical Thought. – 2017. – № 1. – P. 42 - 56. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8728.2017.1.18609 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=18609

Reversibility: drastic reassessment of radicalism of the symbolic exchange

Spektor David Mikhailovich

PhD in Architecture

Docent, the department of Architecture, Moscow State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering

109451 Russia, Moscow, 3-ya Kabelnaya 1

daspektor@mail.ru

Другие публикации этого автора

DOI:

10.7256/2409-8728.2017.1.18609

Review date:

02-04-2016

Publish date:

09-02-2017

Abstract.

The subject of this research is the symbolic exchange and its correlation with the death (in Jean Baudrillard’s rendition). The article demonstrated that the fundamental thoughts of Baudrillard, contained in critical refutation of the dominant positivism of accumulation through opposition to the metaphysically interpreted “death”, and apologies of “reversibility” of the fundamental vital processes, are deep and rightful in its way. In addition to that, Baudrillard is confused in his radicalism, nearly always disproving himself. The article attempts to separate the wheat from the chaff, i.e. contradistinguish Baudrillard’s criticism of nihilism from the resulting from it consequences. The method of this works is associated with the analysis and theoretical reconstruction of the notion of “reversibility” compared to the category of “reversion”. The abstractness of formal structures is being gradually counterpoised with the dialectics of attainment of the form (life) through destruction-rebirth (death). The scientific novelty consist in formulation of the category of “reversibility” in the areas of communication (language), transgressive transformation-dedication, and temporal cycle. The “reversibility” (authentic) is being put in contrast with the “rotation” (temptation) that is primarily views in modifications of transformation, which are close to reversibility and simultaneously inheriting the magical substitution, as well as seduction, perversion, and other remarks of the fall.
Keywords: value, sacrifice, reversion, reversibility, gift, death, Symbolic exchange, anagram, poetry, eurythmy
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References

1.	Bodriiyar Zh. Simvolicheskii obmen i smert'. M.: Dobrosvet, 2000. S. 44, s. 340-341, s. 43, s. 65, s. 67, s. 103, s. 104, s. 238, s. 239, s. 242, s. 263, s. 264, s. 280, s. 327, s. 333, s. 339, s. 339-340.
2.	Polan'i K.M. Izbrannye raboty. M.: Territoriya budushchego, 2010. S. 63 i dalee.
3.	Agamben Dzh. Homo sacer. Suverennaya vlast' i golaya zhizn'. M.: Evropa, 2011. 256 s.
4.	Spektor D.M. Anatomiya vlasti (quaestio facti vs quaestio juris) // Politika i Obshchestvo. 2016. № 2. S. 250-259.
5.	Malamud Sh. Ispech' mir: ritual i mysl' v drevnei Indii. M.: Nauka, Glavnaya redaktsiya vostochnoi literatury, 2005. 350 s.
6.	Markov B. Khram i rynok. Chelovek v prostranstve kul'tury. SPb., 1999. S. 116.
7.	Yaspers K. Smysl i naznachenie istorii. M.: Politizdat, 1991. 527 s.
8.	Markuze G. Eros i tsivilizatsiya. Odnomernyi chelovek. Issledovanie ideologii razvitogo industrial'nogo obshchestva. M.: AST, 2003. 526 s.
9.	Avtonomova N.S. Otkrytaya struktura: Yakobson—Bakhtin—Lotman—Gasparov. M.: Rossiiskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya (ROSSPEN), 2009. S. 27.
10.	Spektor D.M. Evolyutsiya: popytka pozitivno-ontologicheskoi interpretatsii // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2015. № 3. S. 65.
11.	Istoricheskaya poetika. Literaturnye epokhi i tipy khudozhestvennogo soznaniya. M.: Nasledie, 1994. S. 13, s. 10, s. 14.
12.	Tsiv'yan T.V. Model' mira i ee lingvisticheskie osnovy. 3-e izd., ispr. M.: KomKniga, 2006. S. 27.
13.	Armstrong K. Kratkaya istoriya mifa. M.: Otkrytyi mir, 2005. S. 22-23.
14.	Gegel' G.V.F. Fenomenologiya dukha. Soch. T. IV. M., 1959. S. 241-242.

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.