по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophical Thought
Reference:

The concept of ressentiment as an instrument of the philosophical-anthropological cognition
Chugunova Inna

post-graduate student of the Department of the History of Anthropological Doctrines at Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences

109240, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Goncharnaya, 12, str.1

inna.chugunova.2014@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

Article was received:

08-02-2016


Review date:

10-02-2016


Abstract.

This article examines the concept of ressentiment introduced by Friedrich Nietzsche, which was later developed within the humanitarian thought. The idea of ressentiment covers a complex of anthropological and socio-cultural phenomena, which concern the “dark” aspects of the human nature, prohibited by public morality, but nevertheless expanding in the society in a form of envy, hate, revenge, animosity, rivalry, and other negative feelings, perception and behavior. In order to cognize ressentiment, the author explores various aspects of Nietzsche’s philosophical doctrine, which allows him to look at that phenomenon in the broader perspective, as well as analyze its true scale. The article reveals the evristical value of the notion of “ressentiment”, which consists in its ability to describe the reality of a human from the position of his ontological and existential characteristics in comparison with the narrow-descriptive categories that hold a stable place in humanitarian sciences. The ressentiment represents not just a combination of phenomena, but an integral modus of the human being and humanity. The article demonstrated that the cognition of the negative manifestation of human flaws becomes deeper and more meaningful: their genesis and hidden sides are being revealed, as well as an in-depth correlation that consists in the belonging to the unified core of the cultural-historical establishment of a human.

Keywords: resentment, Nietzsche, the nature of man, the will to power, mizantropologiya, hatred, envy, mass society, decadence, neurosis

DOI:

10.7256/2409-8728.2016.2.17914

Publish date:

11-02-2016


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Nitsshe F. Tak govoril Zaratustra // Nitsshe F. Sochineniya v dvukh tomakh. T.2. M.: Mysl', 1990. S. 5-237.
2.
Nazarov V.N. Moral'nyi ressentiment kak simptom sovremennoi kvazitolerantnosti // Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Pravo. Vypusk №8 (103), 2011. T. 16. S. 317-319.
3.
Prokof'ev A.V. Spravedlivost' i resentiment (zametki na polyakh «K genealogii morali F. Nitsshe») // Eticheskaya mysl'. M.: IF RAN, 2013. S. 65–87.
4.
Didenko P.I. Ressentiment liberal'noi intelligentsii // Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 7: Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya i sotsial'nye tekhnologii. №3. 2012. S. 79-85.
5.
Filosofskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar'. M., 1995.
6.
Apresyan R.G. Ressentiment i istoricheskaya dinamika morali // Eticheskaya mysl'. Vyp. 2. M.: IF RAN, 2001. S. 27-40.
7.
Vizgin V. Na puti k drugomu. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoi kul'tury, 2004. 800 s.
8.
Mochkin A.N. Fridrikh Nitsshe (intellektual'naya biografiya). M.: IF RAN, 2005. 246 s.
9.
Sheler M. Resentiment v strukture moralei. M.: Nauka, 1999. (Elektronnyi istochnik: http://krotov.info/libr_min/25_sh/el/er1.html. Data obrashcheniya: 02.02. 16).
10.
Gurevich P.S. Mizantropologiya kak metanoiya // Chelovek. 2014. № 6. S. 20-34.
11.
Mironov V.N. Filosofiya istorii Fridrikha Nitsshe // Voprosy filosofii. 2005. № 11. S. 163-175.
12.
Nitsshe F. Po tu storonu dobra i zla // Nitsshe F. Sochineniya v dvukh tomakh. T.2. M.: Mysl', 1990. S. 238-406.
13.
Malinkin A.N. Uchenie Maksa Shelera o resentimente i ego znachenie dlya sotsiologii // Sotsiologicheskii zhurnal. 1997. №4. S. 116-150.
14.
Medvedev S. Russkii ressentiment // Otechestvennye zapiski. № 6 (63), 2014. Elektronnyi zhurnal. (URL: http://www.strana-oz.ru/2014/6/russkiy-resentiment Data obrashcheniya 02.02.16).
15.
Guseinov A.A., Apresyan R.G. Etika: Uchebnik. M.: Gardariki, 2000. 472 s.
16.
Nitsshe F. K genealogii morali // Nitsshe F. Sochineniya v dvukh tomakh. T.2. M.: Mysl', 1990. S. 407-524.
17.
Gurevich A.Ya. Kategorii srednevekovoi kul'tury. M.: Iskusstvo, 1984. 350 s.
18.
Berdyaev N.A. Tvorchestvo i ob''ektivatsiya. Mn.: Ekonompress, 2000. 304 s.
19.
Freid A. Psikhologiya Ya i zashchitnye mekhanizmy. M.: Pedagogika, 1993. 144 s.
20.
Fromm E. Chelovek dlya sebya. M.: Astrel', 2012. 314 s.
21.
Delez Zh. Logika smysla. M.: Akademicheskii proekt. 2015. 482 s.
22.
Nitsshe F. Veselaya nauka // Nitsshe F. Sochineniya v dvukh tomakh. T.1. M.: Mysl', 1990. S. 491-719.
23.
Markov B. Chelovek, gosudarstvo i Bog v filosofii Nitsshe. SPb.: Vladimir Dal', 2005. 788 s.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website