Статья 'Проблема классификации профессиональных философов: элитологическая модель ' - журнал 'Философская мысль' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophical Thought
Reference:

Problem of classification of the professional philosophers: elitological model

Petrov Vadim

PhD in Philosophy

Educator, the department of Multidisciplinary College, Novgorod State University named after Yaroslav the Wise

173003, Russia, Veliky Novgorod, Sashu Ustinova Street 9, office #1

pve8888@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2409-8728.2016.3.17892

Review date:

07-02-2016


Publish date:

09-03-2016


Abstract: Currently, philosophy is experiencing a problem of classification of the professional philosophers according to certain criteria – conceptual and methodological (V. Tatarkevich, V. N. Sagatovsky), as well as by the degree of the scale of their works and historical impact (K. Jaspers, R. Collins).  This approach of classification could be called “elitological”, in the foundation of which lies recognition of justice and objectiveness of the principle of social and professional inequality. Due to the fact that the creative work of philosophers is distinguished by the depth, scale, and impact, thus in the author’s opinion, a question of the internal hierarchy and its criteria among the professional philosophers themselves, remains legitimate and relevant. Such models, as presented in the article, to a certain extent classify and range the professional philosophers by creating a peculiar hierarchy that is based on the subjective historico-philosophical evaluation of their “supremacy” and achievements. However, there are very few models of such classification because of its excessive subjectivity, therefore the author proposes a possible elitological model for classification of the professional philosophers, which can be divided into five categories (groups) – “A”, “B”, “C”, “D”, and “E”. This model is founded on the contemporary specificity of the philosophical activity and ranges the philosophers by: the most accomplished, original, and systemic (group “A”); the philosophers of the second echelon, the less original and demanded (“B”); the philosophers of the university elites (“D”); and the mass group of the narrow-oriented philosophers-experts (“E”). The article also analyzes the further prospects of discussion and implementation of the professional ranging among the professional philosophers.


Keywords: Ranging of philosophers, Categories of philosophers, Professional philosophers, Professional philosophers, Prominent philosophers, Second echelon philosophers, Elitology, K. Jaspers, R. Collins, V. Tatarkevich
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Tatarkevich Vl. Istoriya filosofii. Antichnaya i srednevekovaya filosofiya. Perm': Izd-vo Permskogo Universiteta, 2000. 482 c.
2.
Sagatovskii V.N. Vselennaya filosofa. M. : Molodaya gvardiya, 1972. 224 s.
3.
Kollinz R. Sotsiologiya filosofii. Global'naya teoriya intellektual'nogo izmeneniya. / Per. s angl. N.S. Rozova i Yu.B. Vertgeim. Novosibirsk: Sibirskii khronograf, 2002. 1281 c.
4.
Yaspers K. Velikie filosofy. Budda, Konfutsii, Lao-tszy, Nagardzhuna. M.: IFRAN, 2007. 236 s.
5.
Afinei Pir mudretsov. V 15-ti knigakh. M. : Nauka, 2003.
6.
Diogen Laertskii O zhizni, ucheniyakh i izrecheniyakh znamenitykh filosofov / Per. s drevnegrech. M.L. Gasparova; obshch. red. i vstup. st. A.F. Loseva. 2-e izd., ispr. M.: Mysl', 1986. 576 c.
7.
Dante A. Bozhestvennaya komediya. / Per. s ital. M. Lozinskogo. Perm': Permskaya kniga, 1994. 479 s.
8.
Karabushchenko P.L. Antropologicheskaya elitologiya. M.-Astrakhan': Izd-vo MOSU, 1999. 231 s.
9.
Ashin G.K. Filosofskaya sostavlyayushchaya elitologii // Voprosy filosofii. 2004. № 7. C. 60–72.
10.
Stepin V.S. Filosofskaya antropologiya i filosofiya nauki. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1992. 191 s.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website