Ценностный статус науки в культуре

Яковлев Владимир Анатольевич

doi:10.7256/2409-8728.2015.12.1756


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Philosophical Thought

Reference:

Iakovlev V.A. — The value status of science in culture // Philosophical Thought. – 2015. – № 12. – P. 41 - 98. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8728.2015.12.1756 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=17563

The value status of science in culture

Iakovlev Vladimir Anatolievich

Doctor of Philosophy

Professor of the Department of Philosophy of Natural Science at Lomonosov Moscow State University

117463, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Inessy Armand, 4, korp. 2, kv. 7

goroda460@yandex.ru

Другие публикации этого автора

DOI:

10.7256/2409-8728.2015.12.1756

Review date:

12-01-2016

Publish date:

17-01-2016

Abstract: The subject of this research is the analysis of the value modalities within the information-communicative paradigm of science. It is emphasized that the genesis (ontology) of science in the area of culture is not only an example and model of the information-communicative innovational processes in all spheres of human activity, but also features the principal ethnic characteristics. It is stated that the newest discoveries in physics, cosmology, and especially in biology not only significantly change the information resources and world views, but also touch upon the deep and existential characteristic of the scholars and entire population of the Earth. The relevance of the value problematics of science is tightly connected with the solution of the question on methodology of researching the values from the perspective of their information-communicative importance. The author detects the main value modalities of science on the three principal stages of the system of scientific activity in the conceptual contexts of the sociocultural historical process. The author claims that through the ethic norms and ideals of the scientific community are most vividly expressed the universal human values of solidarity, Informedness, communicativeness, cohesion, tolerance, and humanity.

Keywords: value, information, communicativeness, the science, scientists, the binary, principles, ethics, sociology, culture
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References

1.	Yakovlev V.A. Informatsionnye programmy bytiya // Filosofskaya mysl'. — 2015.-№ 1.-S. 93 – 147.
2.	Yakovlev V.A. Bytie informatsii ili informatsionnoe bytie? // Filosofiya i kul'tura. — 2015.-№ 2.-S. 173 – 182.
3.	Yakovlev V.A. Informatsionnoe edinstvo bytiya: soznanie, zhizn', materiya // «Filosofskie issledovaniya». — 2013.-№ 10.-S. 1 – 57.
4.	Yakovlev V.A. Informatsionnaya programma novoi epistemologii // Filosofiya i kul'tura. — 2015.-№ 10.-S. 1460 – 1470.
5.	Gurevich P.S. Vektory sovremennogo postizheniya cheloveka // Filosofskii zhurnal. 2013. № 2 (11). S. 95.
6.	Batkin L. M. Ital'yanskie gumanisty: stil' zhizni i stil' myshleniya. M., 1978.
7.	Bragina L. M. Sotsial'no-eticheskie vzglyady ital'yanskikh gumanistov (vtoraya polovina XV v.) M., 1983.
8.	Vindel'band Vil'gel'm. Istoriya filosofii. – K.: Nika-Tsentr, 1997. S. 298.
9.	Erazm Rotterdamskii. Pokhvala gluposti. – V kn.: Biblioteka vsemirnoi literatury. M., 1971, T.33. S. 220.
10.	Monten' Mishel'. Opyty. V 3-kh kn. M., 1979 – 1980. T.2. S. 236.
11.	Antologiya mirovoi filosofii v 4-kh T. M.,1969. T.3. M., 1970. S. 207.
12.	Bekon Frensis. Soch. v dvukh tomakh. 2-e izd. M., 1977 – 1978. T.2. S. 509.
13.	Gaidenko P.P. Evolyutsiya ponyatiya nauki. M., 1980. S.176.
14.	Rassel B. Istoriya zapadnoi filosofii. V 2-kh t. T. II. M., 1993. S. 86.
15.	Tsit. po: Zubov V.P. Galilei i bor'ba za novuyu sistemu mira. Filosofskii zhurnal. № 1 (2). M.: IF RAN, 2009. S.89.
16.	Galileo Galilei. Izbrannye trudy v 2-kh t. T.1. M., 1964. S. 156 – 157.
17.	Briggs R. The scientific revolution of the seventeenth century. London. 1969. P. 43.
18.	Einshtein A. Sobranie nauchnykh trudov. – T. 4. – M.: Nauka, 1967. S. 123–124.
19.	N'yuton I. Optika. M.; L., 1923. S. 313 – 314.
20.	Treder G.Yu. Evolyutsiya osnovnykh fizicheskikh idei. Kiev. 1988. S. 70.
21.	Stepin V.S. Teoreticheskoe znanie. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2000. S. 72.
22.	Khoking St. Kratchaishaya istoriya vremeni / Stiven Khoking, Leonard Mlodinov ; [per. s angl. B. Oralbekova pod red. A. G. Sergeeva]. — SPb. : Amfora. TID Amfora, 2006. S. 72.
23.	Shredinger E. Chto takoe zhizn'? S tochki zreniya fizika. M.: Atomizdat. 1972.
24.	Yakovlev V.A. Metafizika i fizika zhizni // Voprosy filosofii. 2012. № 2. S. 14 – 23.
25.	Chernavskii D.S. Problema proiskhozhdeniya zhizni i myshleniya s tochki zreniya sovremennoi fiziki // Uspekhi fizicheskikh nauk. 2000. Tom 170. № 2. S. 157 – 183.
26.	Yakovlev V.A. Innovatsii v nauke. M.: RAN INION, 1997. S.26-51.
27.	Merton R.K. The Sociology of Science. THEORETICAL AND EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATIONS. University of Chicago Press, 1973.
28.	Viner N. Ya-matematik. M., 1964. S.344.
29.	Popper K. The Myth of the Framework. London-New York. 1996. P.195-198.
30.	Malkei M. Nauka i sotsiologiya znaniya. M., 1983.
31.	Gilbert Dzh., Malkei M. Otkryvaya yashchik Pandory. M., 1987.
32.	Blur D. Sil'naya programma v sotsiologii znaniya / Logos. 2002. № 5-6. S. 162 – 186
33.	Kasavin I.T. Sotsial'naya epistemologiya. Fundamental'nye i prikladnye problemy. M.: Al'fa – M, 2013. C. 541.
34.	Lacey H. Is Science Value Free? Values and Scientific Understanding. London: Rontledge, 1999. S. 241.

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.