по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophical Thought
Reference:

On the Issue of mongolization of Rus’
Korolev Sergei Alekseevich

Doctor of Philosophy

Leading research assistant at Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences

119991, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Volkhonka, 14/1, str. 5, of. 428

s_a_korolev@list.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

Abstract.

The author examines the issue of the Mongol supremacy and its influence upon the development of Russia. The article presents various points of view on this issue that exist within the philosophical and historical literature, including the concepts of the ideologist of Eurasianism. The aspects of derivation of the Mongol models of government are being reviewed; we should note the presence of certain lag, which is substantiated by the fact that Moscovian rulers could understand the Mongol technologies in its entirety only after the liberation from the Mongol yoke. The author critically analyzes the version about the dominant influence of Byzantine Empire on the development of post-Mongol Rus’. The differentiation of the notions “state”, “authority”, and “governing techniques” lies in the foundation of this research. This allows showing a real derivation of the Mongol governing techniques by the Moscovian rulers. The author comes to a conclusion about the evidence of mongolomorphic pseudomorph – overlapping of the Horde-era matrixes of governance with the Russian society and institutions. This process had an extremely negative and long-lasting effect upon the development of Rus’. The Byzantine ideology was primarily used to legitimize the mongolomorphic system of governing techniques.

Keywords: Golden Horde, Russia, Eurasianism, autocracy, technologies of power, power, state, Mongolization, pseudomorphosis, Byzantium

DOI:

10.7256/2409-8728.2015.9.16518

Article was received:

01-10-2015


Review date:

02-10-2015


Publish date:

16-10-2015


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Karamzin N. M. Istoriya gosudarstva Rossiiskogo. T. 5–8. M.: AST; Astrel', 2008. 761 s.
2.
Sergeevich V. I. Lektsii i issledovaniya po drevnei istorii russkogo prava. 4-e izd., dop. i popr. SPb.: Tipografiya M.M. Stasyulevicha, 1910. VIII, 666 s.
3.
Solov'ev S. M. Sochineniya. V 18 kn. Kn. II. Istoriya Rossii s drevneishikh vremen. T. 3–4. M.: Mysl', 1988. 765 c.
4.
Solov'ev S. M. Sochineniya. V 18 kn. Kn. I. Istoriya Rossii s drevneishikh vremen. T. 1–2. M.: Mysl', 1988. 797 s.
5.
Klyuchevskii V.O. Kurs russkoi istorii. Ch. 2 // Klyuchevskii V.O. Soch. v 8-i tt. T. 2. M.: Gospolitizdat, 1957. 468 s.
6.
Platonov S. F. Lektsii po russkoi istorii. Uchebnik russkoi istorii. SPb: Stroilespechat', 1993. 736 s.
7.
Trubetskoi N. S. Istoriya. Kul'tura. Yazyk. M.: Progress-Univers, 1995. 800 s.
8.
Khara-Davan E. Chingis-khan kak polkovodets i ego nasledie. Kul'turno-istoricheskii ocherk Mongol'skoi imperii. 2-e izd. Elista: Kalmytskoe knizhnoe izdatel'stvo, 1991. 196 s.
9.
Grekov B. D., Yakubovskii A. Yu. Zolotaya Orda i ee padenie. M.; L.: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1950. 478 s.
10.
Nasonov A. N. Mongoly i Rus'. M.; L.: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1940. 178 s.
11.
Mongolo-tatarskoe igo // Bol'shaya sovetskaya entsiklopediya. 3-e izd. T. 16. M.: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, 1974. 616 s.
12.
Gal'perin Ch. Vymyshlennoe rodstvo: Moskoviya ne byla naslednitsei Zolotoi Ordy // Rodina. Rossiiskii istoricheskii illyustrirovannyi zhurnal. 2003. № 12. S. 68–71.
13.
Fedotov G. P. Sud'ba i grekhi Rossii. Izbrannye stat'i po filosofii russkoi istorii i kul'tury. V 2-kh tt. T. 2. M.: Sofiya, 1992. 352 s.
14.
Vernadskii G. V. Mongoly i Rus'. Tver'; M.: Lean; Agraf, 1997. 480 s.
15.
Akhiezer A., Klyamkin I., Yakovenko I. Istoriya Rossii: konets ili novoe nachalo? 3-e izd., ispr. i dop. M.: Novoe izdatel'stvo, 2013. 496 s.
16.
Paips R. Vliyanie mongolov na Rus': «za» i «protiv». Istoriograficheskoe issledovanie // Russkii zhurnal [internet-izdanie], 04.10.2007. URL: http://magazines.russ.ru/nz/2011/5/p20.html (data obrashcheniya: 29.09.2015).
17.
Ivanov S. A. Vtoroi Rim glazami Tret'ego. Evolyutsiya obraza Vizantii v rossiiskom obshchestvennom soznanii // Polit.ru. [internet-izdanie], 14.04.2009. URL: http://polit.ru/article/2009/04/14/vizant/ (data obrashcheniya: 29.09.2015).
18.
Gal'perin Ch. Tatarskoe igo: obraz mongolov v srednevekovoi Rossii. Voronezh: Voronezhskii gosudarstvennyi universitet, 2012. 230 s.
19.
Kobrin V. B., Yurganov A. L. Stanovlenie despoticheskogo samoderzhaviya v srednevekovoi Rusi (k postanovke problemy) // Istoriya SSSR. 1991. № 4. S. 54–64.
20.
Korolev S. A. Modernizatsiya i demodernizatsiya v rossiiskoi istorii. Chast' I // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2009. № 1. S. 72–80.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website