Статья 'Современная саморефлексия науки и античный идеал познания' - журнал 'Философская мысль' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophical Thought
Reference:

Contemporary Self-reflections of Science and Antique Ideal of Knowledge

Kulikov Sergey Borisovitch

Doctor of Philosophy

dean at Tomsk State Pedagogical University

634061, Russia, Tomsk Region, Tomsk, str. Kievskaya, 60

kulikovsb@tspu.edu.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2409-8728.2015.8.16371

Review date:

12-09-2015


Publish date:

22-09-2015


Abstract: Object of research is clearing of opportunities of a scientific and extra scientific reflection in the course of creation of a relevant image of science. The author allocates and describes reflection types, achieving the objectives clearing of circumstances at which separate types of a reflection become the supplementing ways of understanding of images of science. The methodology includes realization of the phenomenological approach allowing repeating ways of judgment of idea of science which roots go to antiquity, but in modern conditions of the essence of research activity appearing in the form of essentially different contexts of understanding within the scientific and extra scientific spheres of society and culture in the structure. During research the conclusion was received that the image of science arising in borders of a scientific reflection coincides with the autonomous basis belonging to processes of self-justification of science. This image is expressed in the form of consistent generalization of basic elements of a scientific picture of the world. At the same time the fragmentariness of science within which finding of integrity can be interpreted as extremely remote purpose, which could be realized by scientists under influence of extra scientific spheres of society and culture. Therefore the most exact image of science is under construction within a science self-reflection, but the self-reflection remains are essentially incomplete without participation of philosophers in its institutionalization.


Keywords: world picture, image of science, philosophy, antique legacy, reflection, self-reflection of science, philosophical reflection, integrity, fragmentariness, observer
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Kulikov S.B. Protsessy transformatsii filosofskikh obrazov nauki. Tomsk: Izdatel'stvo TGPU, 2012. 160 s.
2.
Sartr Zh.-P. Voobrazhaemoe. Fenomenologicheskaya psikhologiya vospriyatiya / Perevod s fr. M. Beketovoi. SPb.: Nauka, 2001. 319 s.
3.
Gegel' G.V.F. Entsiklopediya filosofskikh nauk: V 3kh t. M.: Mysl', 1974-77. T. 1. 452 s.
4.
Kopnin P.V. Gnoseologicheskie i logicheskie osnovy nauki. M.: Nauka, 1974. 568 s.
5.
Dyugem P. Fizicheskaya teoriya. Ee tsel' i stroenie / Per. s fr. / Predislovie E. Makha. Izd. 2-e. M.: KomKniga, 2007. 328 s.
6.
Einshtein A., Infel'd L. Evolyutsiya fiziki / Per. s angl. S.G. Suvorova. M.: Nauka, 1965. 327 s.
7.
Megill A. Istoricheskaya epistemologiya: Nauchnaya monografiya. M.: Kanon+; ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 2007. 480 s.
8.
Melik-Gaikazyan I.V., Melik-Gaikazyan M.V., Tarasenko V.F. Metodologiya modelirovaniya nelineinoi dinamiki slozhnykh sistem. M.: Fizmatlit, 2001. 272 s.
9.
Novikov A.S. Nauchnye otkrytiya: povtornye, odnovremennye, svoevremennye, prezhdevremennye. M.: Editorial URSS, 2003. 112 s.
10.
Erenfest P. Otnositel'nost'. Kvanty. Statistika. M.: Nauka, 1972. 360 s.
11.
Savel'ev I.V. Kurs obshchei fiziki: Uchebnoe posobie: v 3kh t. M.: Nauka, 1987. T. 3. 320 s.
12.
Sivukhin D.V. Kurs obshchei fiziki. V 5 t. T. IV Optika. M.: Fizmatlit, 2006. 792 s.
13.
Plank M. Izbrannye trudy. M.: Nauka, 1975. 788 s.
14.
Bagrov V.G. Perekhod ot kvantovoi mekhaniki k klassicheskoi // Sorosovskii obrazovatel'nyi zhurnal. 1999. № 6. S. 110-115.
15.
Bor N. Izbrannye nauchnye trudy: v 2 t. M.: Nauka, 1970-71. T. 1. 583 s.
16.
Bor N. Izbrannye nauchnye trudy: v 2 t. M.: Nauka, 1970-71. T. 2. 675 s.
17.
Shredinger E. Izbrannye trudy po kvantovoi mekhanike. M.: Nauka, 1976. 422 s.
18.
Geizenberg V. Shagi za gorizont / Per. s nem.; nem. Sost. A. V. Akhutin; Obshch. red. i vstup. st. N. F. Ovchinnikova. M.: Progress, 1987. 368 s.
19.
Condon E. U. Remarks on uncertainty principles // Science. 1929. № 31. P. 573-574.
20.
Robertson H.P. The uncertainty principle // Physical Review. 1929. № 34. P. 163-164.
21.
Vainberg S. Mechty ob okonchatel'noi teorii. Fizika v poiskakh samykh fundamental'nykh zakonov prirody / Per. s angl. A.V. Berkova. M.: Editorial URSS , 2004. 256 s.
22.
Makh E. Mekhanika. Istoriko-kriticheskii ocherk ee razvitiya. Izhevsk: Izhevskaya respublikanskaya tipografiya. 2000. 456 s.
23.
Einshtein A. Sobranie nauchnykh trudov: v 4 t. M.: Nauka, 1965-67. T. 1. 598 s.
24.
Logunov A.A. Relyativistskaya teoriya gravitatsii. M.: Nauka, 2006. 253 s.
25.
Ankersmit F. Narrativnaya logika. Semanticheskii analiz yazyka istorika / Per. s angl. O. Gavrishinoi, A. Oleinikva. M.: Ideya-Press, 2003. 360 s.
26.
Jantsch E. The Self Organizing Universe: Scientific and Human Implications of the Emerging Paradigm of Evolution. Oxford-New York, 1980. 342 p.
27.
Gurevich P.S. Spetsifika antropologicheskogo znaniya // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2014. 1. C. 7-11. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2014.1.10295
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website