по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > List of peer reviewers > Review procedure > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Legal information > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Construction of Metaphors and Myths and Their Interpretation
Maydanov Anatoly Stepanovich

Doctor of Philosophy

leading research assistant of the Division of Evolutionary epistemology at Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 

109240, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Goncharnaya, 12, str. 1

anmaid@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

Abstract.

The article is devoted to one of the most important types of semantic creativity of human intelligence – the metaphor which is specific means of display of reality and formation of another, psychologically, ethically and esthetically significant contents. For the analysis the mythology in which for the first time in the history of human thinking reception of a metaforization started being applied is chosen material. The structure of a metaphor, feature of the components making it, an originality of the gnoseological and logical relations between them, a paradoxicality of these relations are analyzed. The special attention is paid to metaphoricalness of mythical images and plots. Features of dynamics and logic of two main stages in genesis of metaphors – a stage of their designing and a stage of interpretation are described. The defining approaches at research of metaphors are cognitive and information, evolutionary and epistemological and nomologichesky, focusing on search of certain regularities and specific logic of process of a metaforization. Such methods as the analysis, distinction, opposition, synthesis, interpretation, identification of the realistic and mystical contents in metaphorical images, their demetaforization appeared the most productive in this research. The specified arsenal of methodological means allowed to receive a number of new results. The whole complex of the methods and receptions of a metaforization used by mythological thinking is revealed. The difficult system of the relations between diverse elements of semantics of metaphors, and also between them, on the one hand, and realities of the vital world of archaic people, with another is characterized. The interpretation of some, the myths of the Indian Veda which still well aren't interpreted which allowed to receive the important information concerning social and spiritual life of the ancient people is offered.

Keywords: metaphor, reality, reflection, representative, referent, meaning, myth, method, function, interpretation

DOI:

10.7256/2409-8728.2015.4.15298

Article was received:

16-05-2015


Review date:

17-05-2015


Publish date:

25-05-2015


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
New Webster’s dictionary of the English language. Delhi, 1989. P.940.
2.
Henle P. Metaphor // Language, Thought and Culture. Ed. by P. Henle. Univ. of Michigan Press. 1958. Ch. VII.
3.
Blek M. Metafora // Teoriya metafory: Sbornik per. s ang., fr., nem., isp., pol'sk. yaz. . — M.: Progress, 1990. S.153.
4.
Aristotel'. Poetika. // Aristotel'. Sochineniya v chetyrekh tomakh: T. 4. M.: Mysl', 1984.
5.
Bikerton D. Vvedenie v lingvisticheskuyu teoriyu metafory // Teoriya metafory: Sbornik per. s ang., fr., nem., isp., pol'sk. yaz. . — M.: Progress, 1990. S. 285.
6.
Kassirer E. Izbrannoe: Individ i kosmos. M.; SPb.: Universitetskaya kniga, 2000.
7.
Serl' Dzh. R. Metafora // Teoriya metafory. S.308-309.
8.
Richards A. Filosofiya ritoriki // Teoriya metafory. S.48.
9.
Lakoff Dzh., Dzhonson M. Metafory, kotorymi my zhivem. M.: Editorial URSS, 2004.
10.
Frezer Dzh.Dzh. Zolotaya vetv'. M.: Politizdat, 1980;
11.
Kassirer E. Filosofiya simvolicheskikh form. T.2. Mifologicheskoe myshlenie. M., SPb., 2001;
12.
Malinovskii B. Magiya. Nauka. Religiya. M.: Refl-buk, 1998.
13.
Shpet G.G. Germenevtika i ee problemy // Kontekst. 1989. S.231–267;
14.
Eliade M. Aspekty mifa. M: Akademicheskii proekt, 2000. S.147–157;
15.
Levi-Stros K. Mifologiki. T.1-4. M.: Flyuid, 2006;
16.
Khenkok G. Sledy bogov: v poiskakh istokov drevnikh tsivilizatsii. M.: Veche, 1997;
17.
Naidysh V.M. Filosofiya mifologii. XIX–nach. XXI v. M.: Al'fa-M, 2004;
18.
Zubko G.V. Mif: vzglyad na mirozdan'e. M.: Universitetskaya kniga, 2008;
19.
Shakhnovich M.M. Evgemer // Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya. T.2. M.: Mysl', 2001. S.6.
20.
Elizarenkova T.Ya. Primechaniya // Rigveda: mandaly I-IV. M.: Nauka, 1999. S.702.
21.
Der Rig-Veda aus dem Sanskrit ins Deutsche Ubersetzt und mit einem laufenden Kommentar versechen von K. F. Geldner. Cambridge. Mass., 1951. III. 31.
22.
Elizarenkova T.Ya. Primechaniya // Rigveda. Mandaly V-VIII. S. 527-528.
23.
Thieme P. Untersuchungen zur wortkunde und auslegung des rigveda. Halle, 1948, S.29.
24.
Atharva-Vede-Samhita. Translated into English with Critical and Exegetical Commentary by W.D. Whitney. Revised and Edited by Ch.R. Lanman. Delhi, 1996;
25.
Hymnes spéculatifs du Véda. Trad. du sanskritet annotés par L. Renou. Paris, 1956;
26.
Kuiper F.B.J. Gandharva and Soma / Studien zur Indologie und Iranistik. 1996. Bd. 20. S. 225–255;
27.
Zehnder Th. Atharvaveda-Paippalāda. Buch 2, Text, Übersetzung, Kommentar. Idstein, 1999;
28.
Elizarenkova T.Ya. O Some v Rigvede // Rigveda. Mandaly IX-X. M.: Nauka, 1999. S. 323–352;
29.
Elizarenkova T.Ya. Primechaniya // Rigveda. Mandaly IX-X. M.: Nauka, 1999;
30.
Elizarenkova T.Ya. Kommentarii // Atkharvaveda. T. 1. M.: Vostochnaya literatura, 2005.
31.
Grintser P.A. Gandkharvy // Mify narodov mira. T. 1. M., 1998. S. 264.
32.
Frege G. Logika i logicheskaya semantika. M., 2000. S . 231.
33.
Gusserl' E. Logicheskie issledovaniya. T. 2. Ch. 1.: Issledovaniya po fenomenologii i teorii poznaniya. M., 2011. S. 50.
34.
Shpet G. G. Iskusstvo kak vid znaniya. M., 2007. S. 401.
35.
Shpet G. G. Germenevtika i ee problemy // Kontekst. M., 1989. S. 244.
36.
Shpet G. G. Yavlenie i smysl — fenomenologiya kak osnovnaya nauka i ee problemy. M. 2007. S. 172.
37.
Maidanov A.S. Mentalitet arkhaicheskogo cheloveka // Polignozis. 2009. № 3. S.112–126.
38.
Maidanov A.S. Real'nost' v mifologicheskom i nauchnom videnii // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2009.-№ 6. S. 33–49.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website