On some manifestations of the category of measure in Russian civil law
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Legal Studies
Reference:

On some manifestations of the category of measure in Russian civil law
Kulikov Egor Alekseevich

PhD in Law

senior lecturer, Chair of Criminal Law and Criminology, Altai State University

656010, Russia, Altaiskii krai, g. Barnaul, ul. Smirnova, 46, kv. 151

kulikoveg@yandex.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2409-7136.2015.7.15191

Review date:

03-05-2015


Publish date:

01-07-2015


Abstract.

The author attempts to analyze some manifestations of the category of measure in civil law. Measure, as a philosophical category of the connective “quantity – quality – measure”, penetrates all legal phenomena and, consequently, has its manifestations in civil law. The article describes the phenomena of the limits of civil rights implementation, the abuse of rights, the notion of a treaty, the principle of freedom of a treaty, and analyzes the problem of the limits of freedom of a treaty. The author concludes that the universality of measure and its categorical character are as salient in civil law as in criminal law. The research is based on the dialectical method which includes the teaching about dialectic categories. Moreover, the author uses the general scientific methods of analysis, synthesis, abstracting, comparison, and the special scientific methods such as the formal-logical method and the method of explanation of the law. The author concludes that the general measure of rights and responsibilities implementation, balancing the measure of freedom of a treaty, is the principle of combination of the letter and the spirit of the law in explanation of the norms of the law. Substantiation of this principle means that the legal positivist grounds are moderated by the grounds of sociological jurisprudence. The understanding of a right as a measure which is typical for both types of legal understanding doesn’t help to reveal a contradiction in this situation but proves that only the combination of approaches to the law can help to evaluate its genuine essence as a living and acting regulator of social relations.

Keywords: measure, law, civil law, freedom of treaty, abuse of rights, subjective right , category of measure, treaty, private law, measure in law
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
O svobode dogovora i ee predelakh: postanovlenie Plenuma Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda RF ot 14 marta 2014 g. № 16 // Vestnik VAS RF. 2014. № 5.
2.
Karapetov A.G., Savel'ev A.I. Svoboda dogovora i ee predely: v 2 t. T. 2: Predely svobody opredeleniya uslovii dogovora v zarubezhnom i rossiiskom prave. M.: Statut, 2012. 453 s.
3.
Rossiiskoe grazhdanskoe pravo: Uchebnik: v 2 t. T. 1: Obshchaya chast'. Veshchnoe pravo. Nasledstvennoe pravo. Intellektual'nye prava. Lichnye neimushchestvennye prava / V.S. Em [i dr.]; otv. red. E.A. Sukhanov. – M.: Statut, 2010.-S. 76.
4.
Ozhegov S.I. Tokovyi slovar' russkogo yazyka: Ok. 100000 slov, terminov i frazeologicheskikh vyrazhenii / pod red. L.I. Skvortsova. M., 2010. S. 1092.
5.
Grazhdanskii kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii (chast' pervaya): federal'nyi zakon ot 30 noyabrya 1994 g. (red. ot 30 dekabrya 2012 g., s izm. i dop., vst. v silu so 2 yanvarya 2013 g) № 51-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 5 dekabrya 1994 g. № 32. St. 3301
6.
Braginskii M.I., Vitryanskii V.V. Dogovornoe pravo. Obshchie polozheniya. – M., 2001. – S. 10.
7.
Alekseev S.S. Sobranie sochinenii. V 10 t. T. 2: Spetsial'nye voprosy pravovedeniya. M., 2010. S. 309.
8.
Kulikov E.A. Kategoriya mery v prave: voprosy teorii. Barnaul: Izd-vo Alt. un-ta, 2013. S. 67.
9.
Kulikov E.A. Kategoriya mery v prave: teoretiko-pravovye i filosofsko-pravovye aspekty: monografiya. M.: Yurlitinform, 2015. S. 257.
10.
Vasev I.N. Sub''ektivnoe pravo kak obshcheteoreticheskaya kategoriya: avtoref. diss... kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.01/ I.N. Vasev.-Ekaterinburg, 2011. S. 6.
11.
Kuz'min I.A. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost' i ee realizatsiya: uchebnoe posobie. Irkutsk: Izd-vo IrGU, 2013. S. 145
12.
Kulikov E.A. Kategoriya mery v pravovoi nauke: voprosy teorii i metodologii issledovaniya // Yuridicheskie issledovaniya. - 2014. - 10. - C. 89 - 99. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7136.2014.10.13349. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_13349.html
13.
Polyakova V.E. Predvaritel'nyi dogovor i deistviya fakticheskogo kharaktera: podkhody rossiiskogo i nemetskogo prava // Pravo i politika. - 2014. - 11. - C. 1768 - 1773. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.11.13268.
14.
Batler U.E. Garmonizatsiya rossiiskogo prava i pravovye normy o trastakh // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya / Journal of foreighn legislation and comparative law. - 2014. - 3. - C. 479 - 482.
15.
Bogdan V.V. Stanovlenie dorevolyutsionnogo rossiiskogo zakonodatel'stva o zashchite prav pokupatelei. // Genesis: istoricheskie issledovaniya. - 2014. - 4. - C. 22 - 31. DOI: 10.7256/2409-868X.2014.4.13355. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/hr/article_13355.html
16.
Bogdan V.V. Aktual'nye problemy dogovornogo regulirovaniya pravootnoshenii s uchastiem potrebitelei // Yuridicheskie issledovaniya. - 2014. - 11. - C. 26 - 35. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7136.2014.11.13354. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_13354.html
17.
Nozhkina A.A. K voprosu ob opredelenii sobytiya, na sluchai nastupleniya kotorogo osushchestvlyaetsya strakhovanie dogovornoi otvetstvennosti // Pravo i politika. - 2014. - 4. - C. 512 - 520. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.4.11455.
18.
Prilutskii R.B. Ob istochnikakh grazhdanskogo i khozyaistvennogo prava Ukrainy // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya / Journal of foreighn legislation and comparative law. - 2013. - 5. - C. 824 - 835.
19.
Trofimova I.N. Grazhdanskoe pravosoznanie v obshchestvenno-politicheskikh praktikakh i tsennostnykh ustanovkakh rossiyan // Pravo i politika. - 2015. - 2. - C. 163 - 174. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2015.2.12138.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website