Проблемы безопасности и устойчивого развития: эволюционный подход и междисциплинарные перспективы

Урсул Аркадий Дмитриевич

doi:10.7256/2409-7543.2014.5.14221


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!

При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.

По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Security Issues

Reference:

Ursul A.D. — Problems of security and sustainable development: an evolution approach and interdisciplinary perspectives // Security Issues. – 2014. – № 5. – P. 1 - 62. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7543.2014.5.14221 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=14221

Problems of security and sustainable development: an evolution approach and interdisciplinary perspectives

Ursul Arkadii Dmitrievich

Doctor of Philosophy

Head of the Center, Scholar at theof the Academy of Sciences of Moldova; Professor, Moscow State Univeristy

119991, Russia, Moscow, Leninskie Gory 1, building #51

ursul-ad@mail.ru

Другие публикации этого автора

DOI:

10.7256/2409-7543.2014.5.14221

Review date:

13-01-2015

Publish date:

27-01-2015

Abstract.

The problem of the mankind survival and biosphere preservation reveals the content of a new concept of civilizational development and a related to it problem of security. Sustainable development is considered as a guided global civilizational process and socio-natural co-evolution, which doesn’t destroy the environment and ensures survival and safe, indefinitely long existence of the mankind. The article considers the conceptual-theoretical issues of security and sustainable development, the difference of the modern model of civilizational process from the society of a sustainable future aimed at the establishment of noosphere (the sphere of intellect). The author uses the interdisciplinary, historical-evolutionary, global, prognostic, system, science of science and other approaches towards the problems of the concept of sustainable development formation analysis and the security issues study. The author emphasizes the necessity to broaden the definition of this type of development and the notion of security, their expansion on new directions and spheres of life activity. The article considers the global dimension of a “sustainable” type of evolution, the problem of demographic sustainability and the interpretation of “sustainability” on the base of a notion of security. Special attention is paid to the nature of ecologic security and the relation between security and development as fundamental categories of a modern science. The author points out the necessity of broadening of the interpretation of the concept and the notion of sustainable development and outlines the main areas of scientific search and the directions of this broadening; it can allow a more effective realization of an adequate strategy in practice in the national and the global scale. The author suggests understanding of sustainable development as a non-regressive, i.e. the most secure type of evolution, directed at the preservation of civilization and biosphere, their coexistence and co-evolution.
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References

1.	Gruppa vysokogo urovnya General'nogo sekretarya po global'noi ustoichivosti (2012 god). «Zhiznesposobnaya planeta zhiznesposobnykh lyudei: budushchee, kotoroe my vybiraem. Obzor». N'yu-Iork: OON, 2012. URL: http://ecodelo.org/13366-ustoichivoe_razvitie_dvadtsat_let_spustya-strategii_razvitiya.
2.	Bedritskii A.I. Ob itogakh Konferentsii OON po ustoichivomu razvitiyu «RIO+20» // Prirodno-resursnye vedomosti. 2012. №6.
3.	Mirskii E.M. Mezhdistsiplinarnye issledovaniya i distsiplinarnaya organizatsiya nauki. M., 1980.
4.	Ogurtsov A.P. Distsiplinarnaya struktura nauki. M., 1988.
5.	Kasavin I.T. Mezhdistsiplinarnoe issledovanie: k ponyatiyu i tipologii // Voprosy filosofii. 2010. №4.
6.	Yarochkin V.I. Sek'yuritologiya – nauka o bezopasnosti zhiznedeyatel'nosti. M.: Os'-89. 2000.
7.	Knyazeva E.N. Nastoyashchee i budushchee transdistsiplinarnykh issledovanii // Budushchee fundamental'noi nauki: Kontseptual'nye, filosofskie i sotsial'nye aspekty problemy / Otv. red. A.A. Krushanov, E.A. Mamchur. 2011.
8.	Ursul A.D. Filosofiya i integrativno-obshchenauchnye protsessy. M.: Nauka. 1981.
9.	Stepin V.S. O filosofskikh osnovaniyakh sinergetiki // Elektronnyi resurs: http://spkurdyumov.narod.ru/Philos.htm#Ph408.
10.	Il'in I.V., Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A. Global'nyi evolyutsionizm: Idei, problemy, gipotezy. M.: Moskovskii universitet, 2012.
11.	Kontseptsiya perekhoda Rossiiskoi Federatsii k ustoichivomu razvitiyu // Rossiiskaya gazeta. 1996. 9 apr.
12.	Lisin V.S., Yusfin Yu.S. Resurso-ekologicheskie problemy XXI veka i metallurgiya. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1998.
13.	Ursul A.D. Put' v noosferu. Kontseptsiya vyzhivaniya i ustoichivogo razvitiya tsivilizatsii. M.: Luch, 1993.
14.	Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A. Universal'nyi evolyutsionizm (kontseptsii, podkhody, printsipy, perspektivy). M.: RAGS, 2007.
15.	Baburin S.N., Ursul A.D. Politika ustoichivogo razvitiya i gosudarstvenno-pravovoi protsess. M.: Magistr: INFRA-M, 2010.
16.	URL: aftershock.su.
17.	URL: worldcrisis.ru/crisis/473153.
18.	Ursul A.D. Intensivnyi put' vzaimodeistviya prirody i obshchestva // Vzaimodeistvie obshchestva i prirody (filosofsko-metodologicheskie aspekty ekologicheskoi problemy). M.: Nauka, 1986.
19.	Intensifikatsiya nauki i proizvodstva: problemy metodologii / Pod red. A.D. Ursula. Kishinev: Shtiintsa, 1987.
20.	Budushchee, kotorogo my khotim. URL: http://www.un.org/ru/sustainablefuture.
21.	Losev K.S. Mify i zabluzhdeniya v ekologii. M.: Nauchnyi mir, 2011.
22.	Il'in I.V., Ursul A.D. Evolyutsionnaya globalistika (kontseptsiya evolyutsii global'nykh protsessov). M.: MGU, 2009.
23.	Il'in I.V., Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A. Global'nye issledovaniya i evolyutsionnyi podkhod. M.: MGU, 2013.
24.	Ilyin I.V., Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A. Global studies and globalistics. The evolutionary dimension. Saarbrücken: Lambert Academic Publishing, 2014.
25.	Il'in I.V., Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A. Globalistika i global'nye issledovaniya. Global'naya revolyutsiya v nauke. Saarbrücken: Dictus Publishing, 2014.
26.	Ursul A.D. Obespechenie bezopasnosti cherez ustoichivoe razvitie // Bezopasnost' Evrazii. 2001. №1.
27.	Romanovich A.L., Ursul A.D. Ustoichivoe budushchee (globalizatsiya, bezopasnost', noosferogenez). M.: Zhizn', 2006.
28.	Ursul A.D. Printsip bezopasnosti cherez ustoichivoe razvitie: kontseptual'no-metodologicheskie aspekty // Bezopasnost' Evrazii. 2009. №2.
29.	Ursul A.D. Strategiya natsional'noi bezopasnosti v rakurse ustoichivogo razvitiya // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / Nota bene. 2010. №3.
30.	Baburin S.N., Dzliev M.I., Ursul A.D. Strategiya natsional'noi bezopasnosti Rossii: teoretiko-metodologicheskie aspekty. M.: Magistr: INFRA-M, 2012.
31.	Ilyin I.V., Ursul A.D. Global World from the Perspective of Security // 3G: Globalistics, Global Studies, Globalization Studies: Scientific Digest / Ed. by I.I. Abylgaziev, I.V. Ilyin. M.: MAKSPress, 2012.
32.	Ursul A.D. Obespechenie natsional'noi bezopasnosti cherez prioritety ustoichivogo razvitiya // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'. 2013. № 01.
33.	Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A., Ivanov A.V. Problema bezopasnosti v perspektive ustoichivogo razvitiya. M.: Universitetskaya kniga, 2014.
34.	Il'in I.V., Ursul A.D., Kalyuzhnaya D.E. Ustoichivoe razvitie i bezopasnost'. Global'noe izmerenie. Saarbrücken: LAP, 2014.
35.	Ursul A.D. Perspektivy ekorazvitiya. M.: Nauka, 1990.
36.	Ursul A.D. Ekologicheskaya bezopasnost' i ustoichivoe razvitie // Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie resursami. Spetsial'nyi vypusk. №11.3. 2008. Noyabr'.
37.	Strategiya natsional'noi bezopasnosti RF do 2020 goda // Rossiiskaya gazeta. 2009. 19 maya.
38.	Ursul A.D. Perspektivy bezopasnogo budushchego: napravleniya razrabotki kontseptsii ustoichivogo razvitiya // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2014. - 6. - C. 856 - 873. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2014.6.13821.
39.	Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A. Problema bezopasnosti: global'nye i universal'no-evolyutsionnye aspekty // Voprosy bezopasnosti. - 2012. - 1. - C. 81 - 159. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/nb/article_67.html
40.	Ursul A.D. Obespechenie natsional'noi bezopasnosti cherez prioritety ustoichivogo razvitiya // Voprosy bezopasnosti. - 2013. - 1. - C. 1 - 61. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7543.2013.1.325. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/nb/article_325.html
41.	Ursul A.D. Natsional'naya ideya i global'nye protsessy: bezopasnost', ustoichivoe razvitie, noosferogenez // Voprosy bezopasnosti. - 2013. - 2. - C. 1 - 66. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7543.2013.2.541. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/nb/article_541.html
42.	A. D. Ursul, T. A. Ursul Budushchee global'nogo mira: obespechenie bezopasnosti cherez ustoichivoe razvitie // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2012. - 3. - C. 23 - 36.
43.	Ursul A.D., Marushevskii G.B. Moral'no-eticheskie problemy chelovechestva v perspektive perekhoda k ustoichivomu razvitiyu // Sotsiodinamika. - 2013. - 11. - C. 1 - 68. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7144.2013.11.10244. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_10244.html

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.