по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophical Thought
Reference:

Scientific Communication: On the Problem of Demarcation of Publicity Borders
Emel'yanova Natal'ya Nikolaevna

PhD in Politics

researcher at Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences

119991, Russia, Moscow, str. Volkhonka, 14

nata.emelyanova86@gmail.com

DOI:

10.7256/2409-8728.2014.11.1380

Review date:

01-01-2013


Publish date:

15-01-2015


Abstract.

Object of this research is the modern system of scientific communications. An object of research – changes of modern scientific communications in the conditions of the new information and media environment. Stable development of science as social institute is impossible without broad public support which inquiries change with development of communication and media technologies. However cardinal changes in development of communication opportunities and alternatives led to prompt changes in information space of modern science. A reverse side of this process was almost exponential growth manipulative the practician which are actively used in generation of the information streams connected with scientific knowledge that, without exaggeration, is the real call to the scientist and their activity. The presented scientific question is in area of interdisciplinary researches (on a joint the nauchnofilosofskikh, the naukovedcheskikh, political and historical disciplines), demands complex use of a number of the methodological principles. Among them: analysis and synthesis, and also principles of historicism and systemacity. Novelty of research is that in this article the perspective directions of development of the scientific communications connected with rehabilitation of the original bases of publicity in modern society are planned.The conclusion that the unique way of development of scientific community in Russia in its relationship with media Wednesday is defined by fight for finding of subjectivity in media is drawn.

This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Arendt Kh. Vita activa, ili O deyatel'noi zhizni / Per. s nem. i angl. V.V. Bibikhina. Spb.: Aleteiya. 2000. 437s.
2.
Bogdanova I.F. Onlainovoe prostranstvo nauchnykh kommunikatsii / Sotsiologiya nauki i tekhnologii. 2010. Tom 1. №1. Ss.140-161.
3.
Ganzhin V.T. Nravstvennost' i nauka: k istorii issledovaniya problemy v evropeiskoi filosofii. M.: Izdatel'stvo Moskovskogo universiteta. 1978. 144 s.
4.
Gromova N.S. Kreolizatsiya tekstov pechatnykh SMI kak sposob manipulyatsii adresatom // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2014. №8-1 (38). Ss. 59-63.
5.
Luman N. Real'nost' mass-media. M: Praksis. 2005. 256s.
6.
Liotar Zh. Sostoyanie postmoderna / Per. s frantsuzskogo N.A. Shmatko. Spb.: Aleteiya. 1998. 160 s.
7.
Mamaeva S.A. Kommunikativnye strategii uchenykh // Nauchnaya periodika: problemy i resheniya. 2011. №3. Ss. 6-13.
8.
Sagan K.E. Mir, polnyi demonov: Nauka kak svecha vo t'me. M.: Al'pina non-fikshn. 2014. 538s.
9.
Talapina E.V. K voprosu ob informatsionnoi funktsii gosudarstva // Informatsionnoe obshchestvo. 2002. Vyp.1. Ss. 20-28.
10.
Khabermas Yu. Filosofskii diskurs o moderne. Per. s nem. – M.: Izdatel'stvo «Ves' mir». 2003. 416s.
11.
Habermas J. Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: MIT Press. 1989. 328p.
12.
Habermas J. The scientization of politics and public opinion/ in Habermas J. Toward a Rational Society – Student Protest, Science and Politucs. London: Heinemann. 1971. Pp.62-80.
13.
Trench B. Internet – Turning Science Communication Inside-Out?-http://doras.dcu.ie/14807/1/internet_science_communication.pdf [Data obrashcheniya: 22.05.2014]
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website