Проблема доступа в теории эпистемологического дисджонктивизма

Прись Игорь Евгеньевич

doi:10.7256/2306-0174.2014.10.1364


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!

При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.

По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Philosophical Thought

Reference:

Pris F. — The Problem of Access in the Theory of Epistemological Disjunctivism // Philosophical Thought. – 2014. – № 10. – P. 1 - 25. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2014.10.1364 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=13641

The Problem of Access in the Theory of Epistemological Disjunctivism

Pris' Igor'

Senior Researcher, Institute of Philosophy

220012, Belarus, g. Minsk, ul. Surganova, 1, of. 810

frigpr@gmail.com

Другие публикации этого автора

DOI:

10.7256/2306-0174.2014.10.1364

Review date:

10-11-2014

Publish date:

24-11-2014

Abstract.

The solution of the problem of access to theories of an epistemological disjunctivism proposed by Duncan Pritchard who claims is stated and analyzed that in paradigmatic cases of perception the agent knows that p, owing to the rational bases for his opinion that p which are at the same time available reflections and factual, that is with need attract existence of the fact, p. The problem of access consists that acquisition of knowledge about belonging to the outside world (that is empirical) the fact by means of only one reflection (that is a priori) is impossible. This problem, however, in the theory of an epistemological disjunctivism is illusory. It is offered to treat an epistemological problem (any, and not just perceptual) knowledge in close connection with a problem of an explanatory failure in consciousness philosophy which in turn can be treated in terms of a Wittgenstein problem of following to the rule. In case of knowledge "failure" between the rational bases for opinion and the fact (knowledge) is closed pragmatically, or phenomenologically in a broad sense. In this sense any knowledge, and not just knowledge perceptual, has phenomenological measurement. Classical definition of knowledge as reasonable true opinion remains provided that justification assumes the rootedness in the fact, that is is justification original (full). The knowledge can also be defined as "successful opinion".
Keywords: externalism, internalism, problem of access, rational reasoning, perceptive knowledge, perceptive experience, epistemological disjunctivism, explanatory gap, following the rule, pragmatism
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References

1.	Ball Brian. Knowledge Is Normal Belief. // Analysis, 2013, Vol. 73. N. 1. C. 69-76.
2.	Benoist Jocelyn. Eléments de philosophie réaliste. Paris: Vrin, 2011.
3.	Boghossian Paul. Epistemic rules. // The Journal of Philosophy. 2008, Vol. CV, n 9.
4.	Pritchard Duncan. Epistemological Disjunctivism. Oxford UP, 2012
5.	Heidegger Martin. Sein und Zeit.
6.	Williamson Timothy. Knowledge and its Limits. Oxford UP, 2000
7.	Williamson Timothy. The Philosophy of Philosophy. Oxford UP, 2007
8.	Williamson Timothy. Reply to Stephen Schiffer. // In (Greenough, P. & Pritchard, D. 2009. Williamson on Knowledge. OUP), 2009
9.	Williamson Timothy. Gettier Cases in Epistemic Logic. // Williamson’s Homepage. 2012
10.	DeRose Keith. Review of (Timothy Williamson Knowledge and its Limits Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000) // Internet
11.	Smithies Declan. Review of (Duncan Pritchard, Epistemological Disjunctivism, Oxford University Press, 2012.) // Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, 2013.
12.	Littlejohn Clayton. Review of (Duncan Pritchard, Epistemological Disjunctivism, Oxford University Press, 2012.) // Internet.
13.	Cohen Stewart and Comesana Juan. Discussion «Williamson on Gettier Cases in Epistemic Logic and the Knowledge Norm for Rational Belief: A Reply to a Reply to a Reply” // Inquiry, 2013, Vol. 56, No. 4, 400–415, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2013.816087
14.	Cohen Stewart and Comesaña Juan. Williamson on Gettier Cases and Epistemic Logic. // Inquiry, 2013, Volume 56, Issue 1, p. 15-29. (Eto otvet na stat'yu Uil'yamsona «Gettier Cases in Epistemic Logic» [9]. Sm. takzhe [13].)
15.	Williamson Timothy. A Note on Gettier Cases in Epistemic Logic (penultimate draft of paper in Philosophical Studies, published online on 1 August 2014, DOI 10.1007/s11098-014-0357-1) // Homepage
16.	French Craig. Perceptual experience and seeing that p. // Synthese. DOI 10.1007/s11229-013-0259-3 (sm. takzhe Homepage).
17.	French Craig. The Formulation of Epistemological Disjunctivism. // Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Forthcoming (sm. Homepage).
18.	McDowell John. Responses. // In: Reading McDowell on Mind and World. Ed. by Nicholas H. Smith. London: Routledge, 2002, pp. 269–305.
19.	Travis Charles. The Silence of the Senses. // Mind, 2004, 113-449, pp. 57–94.
20.	Burge, Tyler Perceptual Entitlement. // Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 2003, Vol. LXVII, No. 3, pp. 503-548.
21.	Burge Tyler. The Origins of Objectivity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
22.	Pritchard Duncan. Wittgenstein on Scepticism. // In the Oxford Handbook to Wittgenstein, (ed.) M. McGinn, Oxford University Press, Forthcoming. 13
23.	Wittgenstein Ludwig. On Certainty. Blackwell, 2003.
24.	Benoist Jocelyn. Le bruit du sensible. Cerf, 2013.
25.	Littlejohn Clayton. Pritchard’s Reasons. // Journal for Philosophical Research. Forthcoming.
26.	Dougherty Trent and Rysiew Patrick. Experience First. // In Contemporary Debates in Epistemology, Second Edition. Edited by Matthias Steup, John Turri, and Ernest Sosa. 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Published 2014 by John Wiley & Sons
27.	Williamson Timothy. Knowledge first. // In Contemporary Debates in Epistemology, Second Edition. Edited by Matthias Steup, John Turri, and Ernest Sosa. 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Published 2014 by John Wiley & Sons
28.	Williamson Timothy. Knowledge still first. // In Contemporary Debates in Epistemology, Second Edition. Edited by Matthias Steup, John Turri, and Ernest Sosa. 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Published 2014 by John Wiley & Sons
29.	Williamson versus Dougherty and Rysiew. / Chapter 1. Should knowledge come first? // In Contemporary Debates in Epistemology, Second Edition. Edited by Matthias Steup, John Turri, and Ernest Sosa. 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Published 2014 by John Wiley & Sons
30.	Foley Richard. Review of Knowledge and its Limits, by Timothy Williamson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
31.	Williamson Timothy. Knowledge and its Limits, by Timothy Williamson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
32.	Kvanvig Jonathan L. Knowledge, Understanding, and Reasons for Belief. // Internet
33.	McDowell John. Criteria, Defeasibility, and Knowledge. // Proceedings of the Britis Academy, 68: 455-479, 1982. McDowell John. Knowledge and the Internal. // Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 55: 877-893, 1995. McDowell John. Perception as a Capacity for Knowledge. Milwaukee, Wisconsin: Marquette University Press, 2011.
34.	Fantl, Jeremy and Matthew McGrath. Knowledge in an Uncertain World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009..
35.	Hawthorne John. Knowledge and Lotteries. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
36.	Kvanvig Jonathan L. Against Pragmatic Encroachment. // Logos & Episteme, 2011, 2.1, pp. 77–85.
37.	Stanley Jason. Knowledge and Practical Interests. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
38.	Kvanvig, Jonathan L. 2014. Rationality and Reﬂection.
39.	Schaﬀer, Jonathan. 2006. “The Irrelevance of the Subject: Against Subject Sensitive Invariantism.” Philosophical Studies 127: 87–107.
40.	Engel, Pascal. 2009. “Pragmatic Encroachement and Epistemic Value.” In Epistemic Value, edited by Alan Millar Adrian Haddock and Duncan Pritchard. 183–204. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.