О чём рассказывает нам внутреннее сродство между садизмом и мазохизмом?

Гончарук Екатерина Александровна

doi:10.7256/2306-0174.2014.8.13444


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!

При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.

По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Philosophical Thought

Reference:

Goncharuk E.A. — What Does the Internal Similiarity Between Sadism and Masochism Tell us About? // Philosophical Thought. – 2014. – № 8. – P. 91 - 108. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2014.8.13444 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=13444

What Does the Internal Similiarity Between Sadism and Masochism Tell us About?

Goncharuk Ekaterina Aleksandrovna

post-graduate student of the Department of History of Anthropological Teachings at Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

119991, Russia, Moscow, ul. Volkhonka, d. 14/1, str. 5.

itallie@mail.ru

Другие публикации этого автора

DOI:

10.7256/2306-0174.2014.8.13444

Review date:

12-10-2014

Publish date:

26-10-2014

Abstract.

The suffering subject in a postmodernism received the versatile characteristic. Differently to an occasion and Zh. Bataille, Zh. Bodriyyar, Zh. Delyoz, S. Zhizhek, Zh.-F. Liotar handled the different purposes to this problem. Philosophers sought to find sources of suffering, the reason of an inclusiveness of this feeling, to reveal social measurement of this experience, to compare masochism to a sadism. In article it is shown that the subject of a sadism received broad interpretation in connection with studying of a phenomenon of the power. Thinkers tried to find justification of love of power in works of classical philosophy and to give broad interpretation to violence. Love of power is all-embracing. All people are ready to subordinate themselves others. Nobody refuses the power voluntary. The victim dreams to become the executioner. Methods of the analysis are connected with philosophical anthropology. In article it is shown that the violence and humility express an essence of a human nature. In this sense between them there is an internal relationship. Besides, in article the historicism method is used. It allowed to compare concepts of postmodernists with classical philosophy. Novelty of article is caused by that the author explains the reasons of interest of postmodernists in a violence phenomenon. Therefore huge interest in the identity of the marquis de Sade came to light. After postmodernists the author compares Kant and de Sade's ethics. The sadism and masochism aren't separately existing phenomena. The victim finds cruel qualities, and the executioner looks for pleasures. The sadist differs in obsession, and the masochist in conciliation. In article the paradoxical logic of these characters is noted. The masochist looks for pleasures in suffering, and the sadist – in unrestrained power.
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References

1.	Batai Zhorzh. Proklyataya chast'. Sakral'naya sotsiologiya / Per. s frants. M., 2006.
2.	Bodriiyar Zhak. Prozrachnost' zla. M., 2006.
3.	Girenok Fedor. Priroda vlasti // Literaturnaya gazeta. 2014. № 36.
4.	Gurevich P.S. Psikhoanaliz lichnosti. M., 2011.
5.	Delez Zh. Nitsshe i filosofiya. M., 2003.
6.	Zhizhek Slavoi. Shchekotlivyi sub''ekt: otsutstvuyushchii tsentr politicheskoi ontologii. M., 2014.
7.	Zakher-Mazokh Leopol'd fon. Venera v mekhakh. Zhil' Delez. Predstavlenie Zakher-Mazokha. Zigmund Freid. Raboty o mazokhizme. M., 1992.
8.	Spirova E.M. Filosofsko-antropologicheskoe soderzhanie simvola. M., 2012.
9.	Eros. Antologiya. Filosofskie marginalii prof. P.S. Gurevicha, M., 2014
10.	Goncharuk E.A. E. Fromm i Zh.-P. Sartr o mazokhizme: sravnitel'nyi analiz // NB: Psikhologiya i psikhotekhnika. - 2014. - 4. - C. 74 - 95. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0425.2014.4.13020. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/psp/article_13020.html
11.	Egorova I.V. Volya k vlasti // NB: Psikhologiya i psikhotekhnika. - 2013. - 7. - C. 19 - 40. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0425.2013.7.10478. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/psp/article_10478.html
12.	P.S. Gurevich Porochnaya chuvstvennost' // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2013. - 4. - C. 317 - 319. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2013.04.1.
13.	Goncharuk E.A. Stradanie v sisteme filosofsko - antropologicheskogo znaniya. // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2014. - 7. - C. 692 - 700. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2014.7.12415.

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.