Взаимодействие «вкуса», «меры» и «гармонии» в произведениях живописи.

Деменёв Денис Николаевич

doi:10.7256/2306-0174.2014.8.13400


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!

При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.

По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Philosophical Thought

Reference:

Demenev D.N. — Interaction Between 'Taste', 'Measure' and 'Harmony' in Artwork // Philosophical Thought. – 2014. – № 8. – P. 109 - 139. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2014.8.13400 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=13400

Interaction Between 'Taste', 'Measure' and 'Harmony' in Artwork

Demenev Denis Nikolaevich

PhD in Philosophy

Аssociate Professor of architecture and fine arts at Nosov Magnitogorsk state technical university

455000, Russia, Chelyabinskaya oblast', g. Magnitogorsk, ul. Lenina, 38, of. korpus

denis-demenev@mail.ru

Другие публикации этого автора

DOI:

10.7256/2306-0174.2014.8.13400

Review date:

12-10-2014

Publish date:

26-10-2014

Abstract.

The main question considered in article is the question of interaction in works of painting of three structural components: taste, measure and harmony. Building structure of a work of art on the basis of this triad, the author proves that art taste is not simply esthetic category, but such active structural component of art creativity which, being inherent initially in its carrier artist, subsequently finds itself in the finished work of art. This structural component, along with "measure" and "harmony" is, according to the author, one of the main (main) form-building structural components of a work of art. At the end of research, the author unexpectedly comes to a conclusion about similarity of a functional purpose of a measure and taste, but parts these categories by identification of the nature of their functioning.Methodological base of this research is the method of the structurally functional analysis; dialectic method; method of a germenevtichesky reduction; method of intellectual speculation, and also general scientific (general-logical) methods: analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, analogy, modeling. As a result of the conducted research, the author comes to the following conclusions: 1. The great guess of I. Kant about social background of antinomy, remains an actual problem and today.
2. In art and creative process, the artist, creating a work of art, deals not with judgments of taste, and with an embodiment of the flavoring judgments in a work of art. And the conclusions about the acceptability and applicability of this or that flavoring preference (i.e. judgments) for concrete work separately, are taken out by reason of the artist.
3. The unity of a work of art, is approved by a triad: first of all – a sozdannost of a work of art, then presentation and an oshchushchayemost. This triad which is esthetic installation of the author, in turn, reveals through the following triad - a triad of structural characteristics of a work of art: measure, harmony, taste.4. The measure and taste, is more subjective structural components whereas harmony, having been born as a result of merge of the first of two, is objective education.5. As a result of existence at art of function not only esthetic, but also psychological, substantial, communicative and, is wider – world outlook – disharmony as an art composition method, is quite proved to put perhaps in one row with harmony. 6. The measure will be necessary until original, that is creative works of painting which, in turn, will depend on novelty of a context are created.
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References

1.	Gurevich P. S. Ponyatie «kholona» v estetike K. Uilbera / P. S. Gurevich // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – M.: Institut filosofii RAN, 2010. – № 10 (34). – S. 5-11.
2.	Losev, A.F. Forma – Stil' – Vyrazhenie / sost. A.A. Takho-Godi; obshch. red. A. A. Takho-Godi i I. I. Makhan'kova. – M. : Mysl', 1995. – 944 s. – S. 306.
3.	Lenin V. I. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii / V. I. Lenin. – 5-e izd. t. 29. –S. 85.
4.	Gegel' G. V.F Sochineniya. Estetika / G. V. F. Gegel'. – T. 12. – S. 17 .
5.	Sulzer, J. G. Allgmeine Theorie der schonen Kunste, Bd. II / J. G. Sulzer. – Leipzig, 1794. – S. 371.
6.	Karamzin, N. M. Pis'ma russkogo puteshestvennika / N. M. Karamzin // Russkaya proza XVIII veka. – M., 1950. – T. II. – S. 316.
7.	Losev, A. F. Istoriya esteticheskikh kategorii / A. F. Losev, V. P. Shestakov. – M. : «Iskusstvo», 1964. – 376 s. – S. 278.
8.	Demenev, D. N. Ontologicheskie osnovaniya khudozhestvennogo tvorchestva [Tekst] : dissertatsiya na soisk. uchen. step. kan. filos. nauk / D. N. Demenev ; nauch. ruk. E. V. Degtyarev ; MaGU . – Magnitogorsk, 2011. – 167 s. – Bibliogr.: s. 153-167.
9.	Demenev D.N. Dialektika iskusstva. O ratsional'nom i dushevno-dukhovnom v iskusstve / D. N. Demenev // Monografiya. Saarbryuken (Saarbrücken): LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2014. – 156 s.
10.	Ziegenfuss, W. Di Uberwindung des Geschmacks / W. Ziegenfuss. – Potsdam, 1949. – S. 113.
11.	Demenev D. N. Mera, garmoniya, vkus, kak vazhneishie strukturnye elementy khudozhestvennogo proizvedeniya / D. N. Demenev // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – M.: Institut filosofii RAN, 2010. – № 10 (34). – S. 21-28.
12.	Kant I. Osnovy metafiziki nravstvennosti / sost., obshch. red. V. F. Asmus. – M.: Mysl', 1999. – S. 787.
13.	Kant I. Osnovy metafiziki nravstvennosti / sost., obshch. red. V. F. Asmus. – M.: Mysl', 1999. – S. 1050, 1051.
14.	Kant I. Osnovy metafiziki nravstvennosti / sost., obshch. red. V. F. Asmus. – M.: Mysl', 1999. – S. 1058.
15.	Kant I. Osnovy metafiziki nravstvennosti / sost., obshch. red. V. F. Asmus. – M.: Mysl', 1999. – S. 1205.
16.	Kant I. Osnovy metafiziki nravstvennosti / sost., obshch. red. V. F. Asmus. – M.: Mysl', 1999. – 1472 s.
17.	Demenev D.N. Ratsional'nyi uroven', kak odno iz vazhneishikh ontologicheskikh osnovanii khudozhestvennogo protsessa. // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. 2013. № 11. S.1-49. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.11.9505. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_9505.html.
18.	Losev, A. F. Istoriya esteticheskikh kategorii / A. F. Losev, V. P. Shestakov. – M. : «Iskusstvo», 1964. – 376 s. – S. 32.
19.	Gegel', G. V. F. Entsiklopediya filosofskikh nauk : v 3 t. / G. V. F. Gegel'. – M. : Mysl', 1975. – T. 1 – 452 s.
20.	Aristotel'. Metafizika. Kniga I // Sochineniya : v 4 t. – M. : Mysl', 1975. – T. 1. – S. 65-93.
21.	Philipp Lersch. Der Aufbau des Characters / Philipp Lersch. – 1938. – S. 23.
22.	Zedl'mair, Kh. Iskusstvo i istina / Kh. Zedl'mair // O teorii i metode istorii iskusstva. – M. : Iskusstvoznanie, 1999. – 367 s. – S. 117.
23.	Sedlmayr, H. Verlust der Mitte / H. Sedlmayr. – Salzburg, 1953. – p. 150-151.
24.	Losev, A. F. Istoriya esteticheskikh kategorii / A. F. Losev, V. P. Shestakov. – M. : «Iskusstvo», 1964. – 376 s. – S. 84.
25.	Bekon F. Novyi Organon. Aforizmy ob istolkovanii prirody i tsarstva cheloveka // Sochineniya. V 2 t. – M.: Mysl', 1978. – T. 2. – 575 s. – S. 46.
26.	A.V. Naumenko Osobennosti krosskul'turnoi kompetentnosti pedagoga (doshkol'noe obrazovatel'noe uchrezhdenie kak strukturnyi komponent professional'nogo soznaniya). // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2011. - 3. - C. 97 - 104.
27.	D.N. Demenev Mera, garmoniya, vkus, kak vazhneishie strukturnye elementy khudozhestvennogo proizvedeniya. // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2010. - 10. - C. 21 - 28.
28.	A.V. Nikol'skaya Sotsial'no-psikhologicheskie aspekty mezhvidovogo vzaimodeistviya // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2012. - 7. - C. 48 - 54.
29.	I. I. Filippova Pozdnie proizvedeniya A. A. Plastova: obrazy i smysly // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2013. - 4. - C. 446 - 452. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2013.4.9203.

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.