Статья 'Философия физики Вернера Гайзенберга и его понятие замкнутой теории в свете позднего Виттгенштайна' - журнал 'Философская мысль' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophical Thought
Reference:

Werner Karl Heisenberg's Philosophy of Physics and his Concept of the Closed Theory in Terms of Late Wittgenstein

Pris' Igor'

Senior Researcher, Institute of Philosophy

220012, Belarus, g. Minsk, ul. Surganova, 1, of. 810

frigpr@gmail.com
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2306-0174.2014.8.12782

Review date:

05-08-2014


Publish date:

26-10-2014


Abstract.

In article a philosophical opinion of Werner Karl Heisenberg is stated, the concept of the closed theory entered by him is interpreted, and also Heisenberg, Niels Bohr and Paul Dirac's views of the nature of inter-theoretical communications are compared. Heisenberg's philosophy is interpreted as a pragmatism and not metaphysical realism of Wittgenstein's type. Unlike Aliza Bokulich preferring Dirac's position concerning the nature of communications between various physical theories the preference is given in article to Heisenberg's position. In article the answer to the questions raised by Erhard Shayboy concerning concept of the closed theory is also offered. Method of research is the philosophy of ordinary language of Ludwig Vittgenshtayn understood as a naturalistic pragmatism, and contextual Wittgenstein's approach of Zhoslin Benuast. Is established that the closed physical theory has the status of the Wittgenstein's rule / concept, or that is equivalent, "life forms". Its validity logical that is Wittgenstein's "philosophical grammar". It can be or applicable or isn't present, but can't be false. According to this interpretation and contrary to a position of the Popper criterion (closed) theory which settled scientific is its not falsifiability.

This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Benoist Jocelyn. Concepts, Paris, Les éditions CERF, 2010/2011.
2.
Benoist Jocelyn. Eléments de philosophie réaliste, Paris, Vrin, 2011.
3.
Benoist Jocelyn. Making Ontology Sensitive // Cont. Philos. Rev. (Published online. 04 August 2012), 2012.
4.
Berry Michael. Review of Bokulich’s book // Brit. J. Phil. Sci., 2010, 0, 1-7.
5.
Bohr Niels. Atomic Theory and Mechanics // Supplement to Nature, No. 2927, December 1925, p. 849 In Stolzenburg, K. (ed.) Niels Bohr, Collected Works. Vol, 5 The Emergence of quantum mechanics, (mainly 1924 ß 1926) 1984. North Holland physics publishing p. 277), 1925.
6.
Bokulich Alisa. Open or Closed? Dirac, Heisenberg, and the Relation between Classical and Quantum Mechanics // Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 2004, 35. (3).
7.
Bokulich Alisa. Re-Examining the Quantum-Classical Relation: Beyond Reductionism and Pluralism, Cambridge UP, 2008.
8.
Brandom Robert. Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment, Harvard UP, 1994.
9.
Brandom Robert. Between Saying and Doing: Towards an Analytic Pragmatism, Oxford UP, 2008.
10.
Brandom Robert. Reason in Philosophy. Animating Ideas, Harvard UP, 2009.
11.
Brandom Robert. Perspectives on Pragmatism, Harvard UP, 2011.
12.
Brandom Robert. Brandom’s München Lectures, May 2011.
13.
Brandom Robert. Reason, Genealogy, and the Heremeneutics of Magnanimity // Homepage, 2012.
14.
Brandom Robert. Categories and Noumena: Two Kantian Axes of Sellars’s Thought // Homepage, 2013
15.
Brandom Robert. From German Idealism to American Pragmatism-and Back // Brandom’s Homepage, 2014.
16.
Brandom Robert. Some Hegelian Ideas of Note for Contemporary Analytic Philosophy // Homepage, 2014.
17.
Cubrovic M. String Theory, Quantum Phase Transitions and the Emergent Fermi-Liquid // Hep-th. 2009.
18.
Dirac P.A.M. The Fundamental Equations of Quantum Mechanics (1925) // In Dirac P.A.M. Collected Works. 1924-1948. Edited by R.H. Dalitz, 1995, p. 67).
19.
Dirac P.A.M. The Lagrangian in Quantum Mechanics (1932) // In (Dirac, P.A.M. 1995. Collected Works. 1924-1948. Edited by R.H. Dalitz, p. 661).
20.
Dirac P.A.M. Letter from Dirac to Fock, 11 November 1932
21.
Dirac P.A.M. The Relation Between Mathematics And Physics // Communicated to the Royal Society of Edinburg, February 6, 1939. In (Dirac, P.A.M. 1995. Collected Works. 1924-1948. Edited by R.H. Dalitz, p. 907).
22.
Einstein A., Infeld L. The Evolution of Physics. The scientific book club in Charing cross road. London W.C. (Available on Internet) (Originally published by Cambridge UP), 1938.
23.
Feiler C. Entanglement and analytical continuation: an intimate relation told by the Riemann zeta function // New J. Phys. 15, June 2013. http://www.njp.org/ doi:10.1088/1367-2630/15/6/063009.
24.
Heisenberg W. Über eine Abänderung der formalin Regeln der Quantentheorie beim Problem der anomalen Zeeman-Effekte // Z. Phys., 1924, 26: 291–307.
25.
Heisenberg Werner. Über quantentheoretische Umdeutung kinematischer und 64 mechanischer Beziehungen // Zeitschrift für Physik, 1935, 33: 879–893.
26.
Heisenberg W. Atomic Physics and Pragmatism, 1929.
27.
Heisenberg Werner. Über das Weltbild der Naturwissenschaft. (Unveröffentlichter Vortrag) (1942) // In (Gesammelte Werke. Collected Works. Band 1. Physik und Erkenntnis. Piper, München, 1984).
28.
Heisenberg Werner. Der Begriff ‚Abgeschlossene Theorie‘ in der Modernen Naturwissenschaft // Dialectica, 1948, 2, 331-336.
29.
Heisenberg Werner. The Notion of a « Closed Theory » in Modern Science (1948) // In (Heisenberg, W. 1974. Across the Frontiers. New York: Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. s. 39-46).
30.
Heisenberg Werner. Physics and philosophy: The revolution in modern science, London: George Allen & Unwin, 1958.
31.
Heisenberg Werner. Sprache and Wirklichkeit in der modernen Physik (1960) // In Sprache and Wirklichkeit, München, 1967.
32.
Heisenberg Werner. Interview with Werner Heisenberg by Joan Bromberg. June 16, 1970.
33.
Heisenberg Werner. Abschluß der Physik? 1970 // In Collected Works, C, III, 1985. S. 385-392
34.
Heisenberg Werner. Across the Frontiers. New York: Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc., 1974.
35.
Heisenberg Werner. Gesammelte Werke. Collected Works, Series B, Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer Verlag, 1984.
36.
Heisenberg Werner. In Gesammelte Werke. Collected Works. Vol. II. Physik und Erkenntnis, 1984.
37.
Heisenberg Werner. Gesammelte Werke. Collected Works. Abteilung C. Band I. Physik und Erkenntnis, Piper München Zürich, 1984.
38.
Horwich P. Wittgenstein’s Metaphilosophy, Clarendon Press, 2012.
39.
Misak C. The Origins of Cambridge Pragmatism. // A talk given at the research workshop «Cambridge Pragmatism». Cambridge. 31 May – 1 June, 2012.
40.
Pris, François-Igor. Le fossé explicatif dans la philosophie de l’esprit du point de vue de la deuxième philosophie de Wittgenstein vue comme un naturalisme normatif, 330 pages. Thèse (PhD) 2008 (Diffusion ANRT 2009), 2008/2009.
41.
Pris Francois-Igor. O smysle printsipa sootvetstviya v kvantovoi mekhanike // ANALYTICA, 2012, 6-03, S. 18-35.
42.
Scheibe Erhard. Die Reduktion physikalischer Theorien. Ein Beitrag zur Einheit der Physik. Teil I: Grundlagen und elementare Theorie, Berlin, Springer, 1997.
43.
Scheibe E. Die Reduktion physikalischer Theorien. Ein Beitrag zur Einheit der Physik. Teil II: Inkommensurabilität und Grenzfallreduktion, Berlin, Springer, 1999.
44.
Falkenburg B. (ed.) Between Rationalism and Empiricism. Erhard Scheibe. Selected Papers in the Philosophy of Physics, Springer, 2001.
45.
Shimony A. Reflections on the philosophy of Bohr, Heisenberg, and Schrödinger // In Physics, philosophy and psychoanalysis, edited by R. S. Cohen and L. Laudan. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1983.
46.
Schiemann G. Werner Heisenberg, C.H. Beck, 2008.
47.
Williams M. Normative Naturalism // International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 2011, 18(3), 335-375.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website