Статья 'Проблема семиософии ноосферной реальности' - журнал 'Философская мысль' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophical Thought
Reference:

The problem of semiosophy of noosphere reality.

Shchuplenkov Nikolai Olegovich

senior lecturer, Department of History, Law and Social Disciplines of the Stavropol State Pedagogical Institute

357600, Russia, Essentuki, ul. Dolina Roz, 7.

veras-nik@yandex.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 
Shchuplenkov Oleg Viktorovich

PhD in History

Associate Professor, Department of History, Law and Social Disciplines, Stavropol State Pedagogical Institute

357600, Russia, Essentuki, ul. Dolina Roz, 7.

oleg.shup@gmail.com
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8728.2014.1.10670

Review date:

18-12-2013


Publish date:

1-1-2014


Abstract: The authors interpret noosphere development as a consciously managed nature oriented co-development of Human Being, Nature and Society, when the satisfaction of needs takes place with no harm for the Universe and later generations. The role of education today is like it has never been before. It may become a leader for the noosphere transition, and the link, by moving which one may resolve other problems of human society. Noosphere education does not deny previously existing systems, rather it takes the best of what humanity has developed  and suports the education with the knowledge of patterns of development of the noosphere system.  The authors formulate and substantiate the concept of semiotic representation of noosphere universum according to the teachings of hte V.I. Vernadskiy on transition from the biosphere to the noosphere.  The problems of noosphere universum are analyzed within the context of correlation of categoreis of "semiotics", "semiology", "fundamental noosphere law", "universal semiotic law", "language conscience", "semioconscience", "semiosphere", "infosphere", "biogeochemical energy", "noogenous biochemical energy", etc.  The philosophical and methodological analysis of the semiotic representation of the noosphere (noosphere reality) allows to suppose that the modern semiotic knowledge facilitates the formation of the new syntetic semiotic discipline - universum (noosphere) semiotics or semiosophy by developing within the lines mentioned by V.V. Ivanov and Y.S. Stepanov. Currently it is fair to speak of environmentalization of the world view, which is the form of humanization of knowledge.  Environmentalization serves the goal of spiritual and practical development of nature in order to form the system of "nature society", functioning "under control" (first of all technical and technological) of the people.  The process of transition from the biosphere to the noosphere viewed through the prism of semiotics and knowledge of the signs of the Universe turns out to be adequate to the cluster of principles of the modern natural sicence, allowing for understanding and explaining of the ways of development of the human civilization within the framework of the modern civilization processes. Semioconscience and semiotic thinking of Vernadksiy allow one to go outside the limits of scientific and religious understanding of noosphere to find symbolic and sign-oriented understanding of noosphere, guaranteeing the in-depth forms of noosphere discourse. The semioconscience may provide assistance for the deeper understanding of the processes of noosphere formation and the noosphere itself as an incomprehensible matter within the contexts of both the XX and the new XXI centuries.


Keywords: globalization, noogenous biochemical energy, noosphere universum, the basic noospher law, semioconscience, semiosphere, technosphere, universal semiotic law, universal evolutionism, universum noosphere conception
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Antonov Nikolai Pavlovich: Filosofiya soznaniya i noosfery. Ivanovo, 2003. 280 s.
2.
Bart R. Sistema mody: St. po semiotike kul'tury. M., 2003. 512 s.
3.
Beitson G. Razum i priroda: Neizbezhnoe edinstvo. M., 2007. 248 s.
4.
Bol'shakov N. N., Kolachevskii B. A., Nosov A. V. Sistemnyi analiz vozmozhnykh posledstvii reformirovaniya vysshego obrazovaniya sovremennoi rossii // Bolonskii protsess i natsional'naya obrazovatel'naya politika. M.: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya, 2009. S. 30–49.
5.
Bragin A. V. Mir kak sistema i chelovek / Ivan. gos. energ. un-t. Ivanovo, 2001.157 s.
6.
Vernadskii V. I. Biogeokhimicheskie ocherki, 1922–1932 gg. M.; L., 1940. S. 13.
7.
Vernadskii V. I. Nauchnaya mysl' kak planetnoe yavlenie. M., 1991. S. 55. 127.146-147.
8.
Vernadskii V. I. Nachalo i vechnost' zhizni. M.: Sovetskaya Rossiya, 1989. 704 s.
9.
Vernadskii V. I. Khimicheskoe stroenie biosfery Zemli i ee okruzheniya. M., 1987. 340 s.
10.
Vladimir Vernadskii: zhizneopisanie, izbrannye trudy, vospominaniya sovremennikov, suzhdeniya potomkov. M., 1993. S. 588.
11.
Girenok F. I. Ekologiya, tsivilizatsiya, noosfera. M.: Nauka, 1987. 180 s.
12.
Girusov E. V. Osnovy sotsial'noi ekologii. M.: RUDN, 1998. 172 s.
13.
Danilova B. C., Kozhevnikov N. N. Kniga prirodnykh znakov kak put' noosferogeneza v informatsionnom obshchestve // Obshchestvo i kniga: ot Gutenberga do Interneta. M.: Traditsiya, 2001. S. 9–19.
14.
Dmitrevskaya I. V. Logika: ucheb. posobie dlya vuzov. M.: Flinta, 2006. 383 s.
15.
Dmitrevskaya I. V. Noosfera kak sistemno organizovannoe Vseobshchee // Noosfernaya paradigma obrazovaniya: ot litseya k universitetu / Ivan. gos. un-t. Ivanovo, 1997. S. 8–27.
16.
Dmitrevskaya I. V. Noosfernyi tekst: sistemno-germenevticheskii analiz // Realii noosfernogo razvitiya. M.: Izd. dom «Noosfera», 2003. S. 194–206.
17.
Dmitrevskaya I. V. «Timei» Platona: mif o Zhivom Kosmose // Noosfernaya ideya i budushchee Rossii / Ivan. gos. un-t. Ivanovo, 1998. S. 29–32.
18.
Zinchenko V. P. Psikhologicheskaya pedagogika: materialy k kursu lektsii. Samara, 1998. Ch. 1: Zhivoe znanie. S. 50.
19.
Ivanov Vyach. Vs. Izbrannye trudy po semiotike i istorii kul'tury. M., 1990. T. 1. 912 s.
20.
Ivanov Vyach. Vs. O vybore very v Vostochnoi Evrope. URL http://www.paganism. ru/choise-f.htm.
21.
Ivanov Vyach. Vs. Chet i nechet: asimmetriya mozga i znakovykh sistem. M., 1978. 184 s.
22.
Kaznacheev V. P. Fenomen cheloveka: kosmicheskie i zemnye istoki. Novosibirsk: Kn. izd-vo, 1991. 126 s.
23.
Karopa G.N. Teoriya i metodika ekologicheskogo obrazovaniya. Gomel': GGU im. F.Skoriny, 2000. 272 s.
24.
Kibernetika i noosfera. M., 1986. 142 s.
25.
Kovalenko S. V. Antropologicheskie osnovy noosferogeneza. M. : Nauka, 2005. 287 s.
26.
Kochergin A. N. Ekologiya i tekhnosfera. M.: MGU, 1995. 132 s.
27.
Lotman Yu. M. Vnutri myslyashchikh mirov: Chelovek – tekst – semiosfera – istoriya. M., 1996. 464 s.
28.
Lotman Yu. M. Semiosfera. SPb.: Iskusstvo-SPb, 2002. 703 s.
29.
Lukin V. Predislovie k knige O. N. Smolina. Obrazovanie. Politika. Zakon: federal'noe zakonodatel'stvo kak faktor obrazovatel'noi politiki v sovremennoi rossii. M.: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya, 2010. S. 3.
30.
Mamedov N.M., Suravegina I.T., Glazachev S.N. Obshchaya ekologiya. M.: Nauka, 1998. 230 s.
31.
Masleev A. G. Chelovecheskoe izmerenie Vselennoi: kosmizm i antropotsentrizm. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo UrGYuA, 1996. 111 s.
32.
Moiseev N. N. Chelovek i noosfera. M.: Molodaya gvardiya, 1990. 351 s.
33.
Moiseev N. N. Universum. Informatsiya. Obshchestvo. M.: Ustoichivyi mir, 2001. 200 s.
34.
Nazarov A. G. Ponyatie noosfernoi real'nosti // Naukovedenie. 2000. № 2. S. 118–131.
35.
Perepiska V. I. Vernadskogo s B. L. Lichkovym (1940–1944). M., 1980. S. 39. 11. 40. 178. 204. 118.
36.
Pechchei A. Chelovecheskie kachestva. M.: Progress, 1985. S. 103.
37.
Portnov A. N. Yazyk i soznanie: osnovnye paradigmy issledovaniya problemy v filosofii XIX–XX vv. / Ivan. gos. un-t. Ivanovo, 1994. 370 s.
38.
Portnov A. N., Nosikova T. A., Shishkina G. M. Semiotika soznaniya: k osnovaniyam kognitivno-antropologicheskogo podkhoda // Filosofiya soznaniya v KhKh veke: Problemy i resheniya. Ivanovo, 1994. S. 169–184.
39.
Portnov A. N., Smirnov D. G. Noosfera i semiosfera // Noosfernye issledovaniya. Vyp. 2. S. 88–178.
40.
Portnov A. N., Turchin A. S. Semioticheskaya funktsiya: filosofskie, sotsiologicheskie, psikhologicheskie aspekty // Vestn. Ivan. gos. un-ta. 2002. Vyp. 2. S. 5–20.
41.
Sebeok T. A. Kul'tura i semiotika: Uchenie o znakakh // Filosofiya yazyka i semiotika. Ivanovo, 1995. S. 32–43.
42.
Smirnov G. S. Noosfernoe soznanie i noosfernaya real'nost' / Ivan. gos. un-t. Ivanovo, 1998. S. 96.
43.
Smirnov D. G. Semiosoznanie v epokhu globalizatsii: semioticheskii imperativ noosfernoi real'nosti // Vestn. IvGU. 2006. Vyp. 2. S. 54–64.
44.
Smirnov D. G. Semioticheskoe izmerenie noosfernoi real'nosti // Sovremennaya nauka i problemy vybora zhiznennoi strategii chelovechestva. Tula: Izd-vo TulGU, 2003. S. 219–229.
45.
Smirnov D. G. Semioticheskoe izmerenie noosfernogo obrazovaniya // Voprosy sovremennoi nauki i praktiki. Universitet im. V. I. Vernadskogo. 2005. № 2. S. 203–212.
46.
Smirnov D. G. Semiosofiya noosfernogo universuma: noosfera i semiosfera v global'nom diskurse. Ivanovo: Ivan. gos. un-t, 2008. 372 s.
47.
Smirnov D. G. Universumnaya (noosfernaya) semiotika // Uchen. zap. Tavrich. nats. un-ta im. V. I. Vernadskogo. Simferopol', 2006. T. 19 (58). № 1. Filosofiya. S. 84–87.
48.
Smolin O. N. Bolonskii protsess i rossiiskoe zakonodatel'stvo // Bolonskii protsess i natsional'naya obrazovatel'naya politika. M.: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya, 2009. S. 13–23.
49.
Stepanov Yu. S. V trekhmernom prostranstve yazyka. M., 1985. 335 s.
50.
Stepanov Yu. S. Semiotika. M., 1971. 168 s.
51.
Teteryukova O. M. Mirovye integratsionnye obrazovatel'nye protsessy: plyusy i minusy globalizatsii // Bolonskii protsess i natsional'naya obrazovatel'naya politika. M.: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya, 2009. S. 86.
52.
Uemov A. I. Veshchi, svoistva i otnosheniya. M.: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1963. 184 s.
53.
Uemov A. I. Sistemnyi podkhod i obshchaya teoriya sistem. M.: Mysl', 1978. 272 s.
54.
Ursul A. D. Put' v noosferu. Kontseptsiya vyzhivaniya i ustoichivogo razvitiya tsivilizatsii. M.: Luch, 1993. 274 s.
55.
Fedorov V. M. Biosfera, zemledelie, chelovechestvo. M.: Agropromizdat, 1990. 237 s.
56.
Filosofsko-psikhologicheskie problemy razvitiya obrazovaniya / Pod red. V.V. Davydova. M.: Pedagogika, 1981. S. 19 – 20.
57.
Khaidegger M. Vopros o tekhnike // Khaidegger M. Vremya i bytie. M.: Respublika, 1991. S. 221–238.
58.
Khaidegger M. K voprosu o naznachenii dela myshleniya / per. A. N. Portnova // Filosofiya soznaniya v XX veke: problemy i resheniya / Ivan. gos. un-t. Ivanovo, 1991. S. 225–235.
59.
Chernenko E. V. Problemy i protivorechiya realizatsii printsipov Bolonskogo protsessa v sovremennoi vysshei shkole rossii (na primere Omskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta) // Bolonskii protsess i natsional'naya obrazovatel'naya politika. M.: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya, 2009. S. 94–99.
60.
Shelkovnikov A. Yu. Filosofiya semiotiki. M.: Izd-vo Akad. povysheniya kvalifikatsii i prof. perepodgotovki rabotnikov obrazovaniya, 2006. 169 s.
61.
Shveitser A. Blagogovenie pered zhizn'yu: Per. s nem. M.: Progress, 1992. S. 506.
62.
Epshtein M. N. Proektivnyi slovar' filosofii: Novye ponyatiya i terminy. № 4. http://topos.ru/article/1846.
63.
Yanshin A. L. Uchenie V. I. Vernadskogo o biosfere i perekhode ee v noosferu // Vernadskii V. I. Filosofskie mysli naturalista. M.: Nauka, 1988. S. 498.
64.
Abrantes R. The art and science of communication. http://www.etologi.dk/English/ ENTheArtAndScienceOfCommunicationBody.htm.
65.
Hoffmeyer J. The swarming body // Semiotics around the world: Proc. of the fifth congress of the international association for semiotic studies. Berkeley, 1994. http://www.molbio. ku.dk/MolBioPages/abk/PersonalPages/Jesper/Swarm.html.
66.
Hoffmeyer J. The unfolding semiosphere // Biological and epistemological perspectives on selection and self-organization: Proc. on the international seminar on evolutionary systems. Dordrecht, 1998. http://www.molbio.ku.dk/MolBioPages/abk/PersonalPages/ Jesper/Unfolding. html
67.
A.B. Khomyakov Svet v mozge ili prostoe reshenie «trudnoi problemy soznaniya». // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2012. - 7. - C. 44 - 53.
68.
M. A. Laktionova Gendernoe nasilie kak global'naya problema: ekspertnyi analiz // Natsional'naya bezopasnost'. - 2011. - 4. - C. 27 - 35.
69.
P.S. Gurevich Globalizatsiya i mul'tikul'turalizm // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2012. - 8. - C. 4 - 5.
70.
Balayan E.Yu. Nekotorye aspekty problemy zashchity prav cheloveka v usloviyakh sovremennykh globalizatsionnykh preobrazovanii // Aktual'nye problemy rossiiskogo prava. - 2011. - 3. - C. 61 - 69.
71.
Yu.V. Lobanova Sotsiokul'turnye posledstviya globalizatsii i problema dialoga kul'tur. // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2011. - 4. - C. 130 - 136.
72.
V.P. Torukalo, N.A. Ivan'ko Problema tselostnosti sotsiuma v usloviyakh sovremennoi sotsiokul'turnoi nestabil'nosti // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2012. - 4. - C. 50 - 64.
73.
Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A. Globalizatsiya v perspektive ustoichivogo budushchego // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2013. - 5. - C. 1 - 63. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_794.html
74.
Kuznetsov Yu.V. Problema demarkatsii pri analize nauchnoi diskussii v usloviyakh mul'tikul'turalizma // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. - 2013. - 2. - C. 231 - 258. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_272.html
75.
Yu. S. Zubenko Problemy okhrany arkheologicheskikh nakhodok v Respublike Altai: opyt pravoprimeneniya // Politika i obshchestvo. - 2011. - 7. - C. 64 - 73.
76.
Kostennikov M.V. K voprosu o nekotorykh aktual'nykh problemakh administrativnogo prava // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 71 - 95. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8840.html
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website