Операторный подход в теории литературы: нарративные операторы, их свойства и применение

Бойко Михаил Евгеньевич

doi:10.7256/2454-0749.2016.3.18352


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Philology: scientific researches

Reference:

Boyko M. The Operator Approach to the Theory of Literature: Narrative Operators, Their Features and Scope of Application // Philology: scientific researches. 2016. № 3. P. 268-276. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0749.2016.3.18352 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=18352

Операторный подход в теории литературы: нарративные операторы, их свойства и применение

Boiko Mikhail

PhD in Art History

not provided

121069, Russia, g. Moscow, per. Trubnikovskii, 17, redaktsionno-izdatel'skii otdel

michboy@mail.ru

Other publications by this author

Article was published in rubric "Discourse"

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0749.2016.3.18352

Received:

15-03-2016

Published:

27-10-2016

Abstract: The subject of the research is the solution of the problem regarding the relationship betwen fiction and reailty by using the so called 'operator approach'. Boyko analyzes the reasons that encouraged researchers to introduce 'narrative operators' in the theory of literature, in particular, the 'fiction-operator'. He also analyzes arguments of Hector-Neri Castañeda against the operator approach as well as his thesis that the difference between fictional statements and reality statements is the nature of predication. Boyko analyzes the features of narrative approaches and introduces the term 'narrative-analytical operator' that has the feature of linearity. The main research method used by the author is the operator approach based on the analogy with the operator calculus in mathematics and natural sciences. It is demonstrated that the operator approach to the theory of literature has a great heuristical power and allows to formalize certain complex issues as well as to provide clear, strict and efficient solutions. The author proves that the ambivalency theory of Hector-Neri Castañeda does not oppose to the operator approach but on the contrary constitutes one of its logical consequences. It is stated that the operator approach is one of the most powerful instruments in the modern theory of literature. The author of the article also outlines a range of important issues that can be solved by the operator approach.

Keywords:

David Lewis, narrative operator, narratology, semantics, semantic operator, structuralism, theory of literature, fictional discourse, formalization, fiction

References

1. Coquet J.-C. Sémiotique littéraire. — Paris: Jean-Pierre Delarge et Mame, 1973. — 268 p.
2. Ryan M.-L. The Modal Structure of Narrative Universes // Poetics Today. —1985. — Vol. 6. — № 4. — P. 717–755.
3. Ronen R. Possible worlds in literary theory. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. — 244 p.
4. Boiko M. E. Tipologicheskie i strukturnye osobennosti fabuly kinoproizvedenii vtoroi poloviny XX – nachala XXI veka : dissertatsiya ... kandidata iskusstvovedeniya : 17.00.03. — Moskva, 2014. — 191 s.
5. Kastaneda G.-N. Khudozhestvennyi vymysel i deistvitel'nost' // Logos. — 1999. — № 3. — S. 69–102.
6. Lewis D. Philosophical Papers. Vol. I. — New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983. — 304 p.
7. L'yuiz D. Istinnost' v vymysle // Logos. — 1999. — № 3. — S. 48–68.
8. Vezhbitska A. Metatekst v tekste // Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike. — Vyp. VIII. Lingvistika teksta. — M.: Progress, 1978. — S. 402–421.
9. Neiman I. fon. Matematicheskie osnovy kvantovoi mekhaniki. — M.: Nauka, 1964. — 368 s.
10. Genette G. Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. — 456 p.
11. Olesha Yu. K. Zagovor chuvstv: Romany. Rasskazy. P'esy. Stat'i. Vospominaniya. Ni dnya bez strochki. — SPb.: Kristall, 1999. — 848 s.
12. Levin Yu. I. Povestvovatel'naya struktura kak generator smysla: tekst v tekste u Kh. L. Borkhesa // Trudy po znakovym sistemam. — Vyp. 14. — Tartu: Tartuskii gosudarstvennyi universitet, 1981. — S. 45–64.
13. Boiko M. E. Lichnost' narratora i rekonstruktsiya fabuly romana E. T. A. Gofmana «Eliksiry d'yavola» // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. — 2014. — № 11. — Ch. 1. — S. 31–34.
14. Boiko M. E. Formalizatsiya literaturno-kriticheskoi deyatel'nosti // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. — 2011. — № 6. — S. 112–115.
15. Boiko M. E. Algokritika kak formal'nyi metod // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. — 2016. — № 3. — Ch. 2. — S. 14–17.
16. Boiko M. E. Realizm i trekhoperatornyi metod interpretatsii // Filologiya: nauchnye issledovaniya. — 2015. — № 3. — S. 224–228.

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.