|
MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Philology: scientific researches
Reference:
Trepachko A.N.
David Samoilov’s Creativity as a Continuation of the Classical Traditions of Russian Literature
// Philology: scientific researches.
2016. № 3.
P. 219-229.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0749.2016.3.18208 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=18208
Творчество Д. Самойлова как продолжение классических традиций русской литературы
Trepachko Anna Nikolaevna
PhD in Philology
associate professor of the Department of the Culture of Russian Speech at North Caucasian Federal University
355007, Russia, Stavropol Region, Stavropol, str. Saratovskaya, 38
|
anna.fyyf.trepachko@mail.ru
|
|
|
|
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0749.2016.3.18208
Received:
03-03-2016
Published:
27-10-2016
Abstract:
The subject of the work is the artistic means used by Samoylov which are understood as a system of principles structurally organizing his texts. The author conducts a study of the "alien speech" in the texts of David Samoilov in terms of semantic, cultural-historical and philosophical aspects. Trepachko also takes into account the poet's addressing to texts, explanations, plotlines, principles, and techniques that exist in Russian classical literature. The researcher traces back patterns that connect the work of the poet with the works of the authors of Russian classical literature. The author also analyses the development of the poetic style of David Samoilov in terms of contemporary culture as well as the poet's formation of new meanings relevant to cultural-historical space of the XXth -XXIth centuries. Using the methods of comparative-historical, structural and semiotic, historical and biographical analysis of functional units in the intertextual poetry of David Samoilov, the author finds out that there were dialogical relations between the poet's creative work and that of the authors of Russian classical literature. The original approach is the author's approach to interpreting elements of the intertext as values as well as the in-depth study of the "alien speech" from the perspective of semantic, philosophical and cultural-historical aspects. The results can be used during lectures and training on the history of Russian literature of the XXth century as well as specialized courses and seminars.
Keywords:
archiseme, allusions, dialogical relations, reminiscence, intertextual field, theoretical literary concepts, 'alien speech', intertext, literary studies, Russian classical literature
References
1. Abramov, Yu. Sovremennaya poeziya // Voprosy literatury. №4,1994. – S.47.
2. Bakhtin, M. M. Voprosy literatury i estetiki. M., 1976. – S. 115-120.
3. Bakhtin, M. M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva. M., 1979. – S. 321.
4. Ginzburg, L. O lirike. L., 1974. – S. 35-38.
5. Lavlinskii, L. Perebiraya nashi daty // Literaturnoe obozrenie. №11,1980. – S.64.
6. Lotman Yu.M. V shkole poeticheskogo slova: Pushkin, Lermontov, Gogol'.-M.: Prosveshchenie, 1988. – S.112.
7. Malysheva, G. N. Ocherki russkoi poezii 1980-kh godov: Spetsifika zhanrov i stilei. M., 1996. – S. 57.
8. Polyakov, M. Voprosy poetiki i khudozhestvennoi semantiki. M., 1978. – S. 350-367.
9. Rassadin, P. Na pereklichke traditsii // Yunost'. 1968. № 11. – S. 21.
10. Ratgauz, G. Glubokaya prostota // Yunost'. 1980. № 2. – S. 96.
11. Sarychev, V. A. Estetika russkogo modernizma. M., 1987. 4– S. 67.
12. Solov'ev, V. Poslednii pereval // Oktyabr'. 1990. № 5. – S. 52.
13. Trepachko, A. N. Chuzhaya rech' v tvorchestve Davida Samoilova: Avtoref. diss. ... kand. filol. nauk. Stavropol', 2004. – S.14.
14. Chudakova, M. Vozvrashchennaya lirika // Voprosy literatury. №6. – 2000. – S.17
15. Strashnov, S. Znaki neba v pamyati zemli // Literaturnoe obozrenie. №2,1992. – S. 27.
16. Shtain, K.E. Poeticheskii tekst v nauchnom kontekste. Spb. – Stavropol',1996. – S.46.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
|