Статья 'Логика мифологического мышления. Часть 2. Парадигмальность мифологического мышления' - журнал 'Философия и культура' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Maydanov, A. S. The Logic of Mythological Thinking Part 2. Paradigms of Mythological Thinking

Abstract: The author of the article tries to answer the question if we can talk about the logic of mythological thinking and if we can, then what the logic of mythological thinking is all about? The author proves that we can’t apply the term ‘logic’ as it was understood by Aristotle here. The author also describes how the views on the logic of mythological thinking have been developing with time and defines the most promising points of view for his study. He describes the consciousness of archaic people and finds out that special features of their consciousness were conditioned by particular forms and rules of thinking. In his study the author uses the evolutionary approach, comparison methods, generalization method and the method of new typification. The author establishes that the archaic thinking was based on certain principles and specific paradigms. As a consequence, mythological thinking is a special type of thinking activity operating a great number of unique methods and techniques. Under the influence of these factors, the process of myth creation has appeared to be a rather determined, theological, efficient and psychologically and esthetically efficient.


Keywords:

myth, consciousness, image, concept, reality, determinants, opposition, schemes, paradigms, correlation. ETHICS


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Rigveda. Mandaly I-IV, V-VIII, IX-X / Per. T.Ya. Elizarenkovoy. M., 1989, 1995, 1999.
2. Malinovskiy B. Magiya, religiya i nauka. M., 1998.
3. Levi-Stros K. Strukturnaya antropologiya. M., 1983.
4. Losev A.F. Dialektika mifa. M., 2001.
5. Levi-Stros K. Pervobytnoe myshlenie. M., 1994.
6. Levi-Stros K. Mifologiki: chelovek golyy. M., 2007.
7. Levi-Bryul' L. Sverkh'estestvennoe v pervobytnom myshlenii. M., 1994.
8. Kassirer E. Filosofiya simvolicheskikh form: Vvedenie i postanovka problemy // Kul'turologiya. XX vek. M., 1995.
9. Kassirer E. Izbrannoe: Opyt o cheloveke. M., 1998.
10. Kassirer E. Izbrannoe: Individ i kosmos. M.-SPb., 2000.
11. Avesta v russkikh perevodakh. SPb., 1998.
12. Taylor E.B. Pervobytnaya kul'tura. M., 1989.
13. Frezer Dzh. Dzh. Zolotaya vetv': issledovanie magii i religii. M., 1980.
14. Eliade M. Kosmos i istoriya. M., 1987.
15. Yung K.G. Arkhetip i simvol. M., 1991
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.