Ñòàòüÿ 'Ïðîáëåìà ãåíèàëüíîñòè â êîíòåêñòå ôèëîñîôñêîé àíòðîïîëîãèè' - æóðíàë 'Ôèëîñîôèÿ è êóëüòóðà' - NotaBene.ru
ïî
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Chernov, S. V. The Problem of Genius From the Point of View of Philosophical Anthropology

Abstract: From the point of view of philosophical anthropology genius is viewed, first of all, as a higher state of human mind and secondly, as a phenomenon of spiritual culture. The author of the article defines the three types of mind, practical mind, positive mind and creative mind. Human is different from other living creatures not because human has a mind but because human has spirits (‘human genius’) presented in mind, consciousness and creative activity as an integrated phenomenon. It is proved that human genius is what triggers human history and develops spiritual culture. In its turn, genius is created by culture in all known forms of culture (religion, art, philosophy, science and education) because it is the main source of spiritual culture.


Keywords:

philosophical anthropology, genius, practical mind, positive mind, creative mind, cognition, creative activity, contemplation of ideas, spiritual culture.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Asmus V.F. Immanuil Kant. – M.: Vysshaya shkola, 2005. – 439 s.
2. Berdyaev N.A. Smysl tvorchestva: Opyt opravdaniya cheloveka. – M.: AST: AST MOSKVA: KhRANITEL', 2007. – 668 s.
3. Veyninger O. Pol i kharakter: Printsipial'noe issledovanie. – M.: «Latard», 1997. – 357 s.
4. Elinek Yan. Bol'shoy illyustrirovannyy atlas pervobytnogo cheloveka. – Praga: Artiya, 1985. – 560 s.
5. Kant I. Antropologiya s pragmaticheskoy tochki zreniya // Kritika chistogo razuma. – M.: Eksmo; SPb.: Midgard, 2007. – S.899–1070.
6. Kant I. Kritika sposobnosti suzhdeniya // Kant Immanuil. Sochineniya v shesti tomakh. – M., 1966. T.5
7. Losev A.F. Istoriya antichnoy estetiki. Pozdniy ellinizm. – Khar'kov Folio; OOO «Izdatel'stvo AST», 2000. – 960 s.
8. Losev A.F. Veshch' i imya. Samoe samo. – SPb.: «Izdatel'stvo Olega Abyshko», 2008. – 576 s.
9. Porshnev B.F. O nachale chelovecheskoy istorii. (Problemy paleopsikhologii) – M.: «FERI-V, 2006. – 640 s.
10. Frankl V. Chelovek v poiskakh smysla. – M.: Progress, 1990. – 368 s.
11. Chernov S.V. Kontseptual'nye osnovy issledovaniya chelovecheskogo geniya // Psikhologiya i psikhotekhnika. – ¹3(18), 2010. – S.45–55.
12. Chernov S.V.. Geniy kak khudozhnik, kak myslitel', kak tvorets // Psikhologiya i psikhotekhnika, ¹ 1(28), 2011. – S.34–44.
13. Chernov S.V. O tvorcheskom naznachenii cheloveka // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – ¹1 (37), 2011. – S.41–49.
14. Sheler M. Problemy sotsiologii znaniya. – M.: Institut obshchegumanitarnykh issledovaniy, 2011. – 320 s.
15. Shelling F.V.Y. Sochineniya v dvukh tomakh.– M., 1987. T.1.
16. Shelling F.V.Y. Filosofiya iskusstva. – M., 1966. – 496 s.
17. Shopengauer A. Sobranie sochineniy: V 6 T. T.1: Mir kak volya i predstavlenie. – M.: TERRA – Knizhnyy klub; Respublika, 2001. – S.164–177.
18. Shopengauer A. Sobranie sochineniy: V 6 T. T.5: Paralipomena. – M.: TERRA – Knizhnyy klub; Respublika, 2001. – S.57–71.
19. Yaspers K. Razum i ekzistentsiya. – M.: «Kanon+» ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 2013. – 336 s.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.