Статья 'Метаморфозы субъектности в конструктивистских моделях философствования' - журнал 'Философия и культура' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Bogdanova, V. O. Metamorphoses of Subjectivity in Constructivist Models

Abstract: The article is devoted to constructivist models of philosophizing in terms of their succession and interdependence in accordance with particular historically developed traditions of philosophizing. The author of the article defines the three types of constructivist models of philosophizing: constructivist hylomorphism, constructivist eidetics and constructivist hermeneutics. In constructivist hylomorphism the basic constructs are a priori forms of cognition that create prerequisites for subjectivity, in constructivist eidetics – phenomena of consciousness that ensure the subjectivity of the world and in constructivist hermeneutics – communication means that create conditions for inter-subjectivity.


Keywords:

philosophy, subject, epistemology, knowledge, constructivism, philosophizing, typology, hylomorphism, eidetic, hermeneutics.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Berger P., Lukman T. Sotsial'noe konstruirovanie real'nosti. Traktat po sotsiologii zna-niya. M.: Medum, 1995.
2. Vitgenshtein L. O dostovernosti // Voprosy filosofii. 1991. № 2. S. 67–120.
3. Gutner G. B. Gileomorfizm, eidetika i kommunikativnye praktiki // Nauka: ot metodologii k ontologii. M.: IF RAN, 2009. S. 152–167.
4. Kasavin I. T. Konst ru k tivizm: za yavlennye prog rammy i nereshennye problemy // Epistemologiya & filosofiya nauki. 2008. T. X V. № 1. S. 5–14.
5. Knyazeva E. N. Epistemologicheskii konstruktivizm // Filosofiya nauki. Vyp. 12: Fenomen soznaniya. M.: IF RAN, 2006. S. 133–152.
6. Konstruktivizm v teorii poznaniya / O tv. red. V. A. Lektorskii. M.: IF RAN, 2008.
7. Konstruktivistskii podkhod v epistemologii i naukakh o cheloveke / Otv. red. V. A. Lektorskii. M.: Kanon+ ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 2009.
8. Konstruktivizm v epistemologii i naukakh o cheloveke: (materialy «Kruglogo stola») // Voprosy filosofii. 2008. № 3. S. 18.
9. Levi-Stross K. Strukturnaya antropologiya. M.: EKSMO-Press, 2001.
10. Lektorskii V. A. Epistemologiya klassicheskaya i neklassicheskaya. M.: Editorial URSS, 2009.
11. Maturana U., Varela F. Drevo poznaniya: biologicheskie korni chelovecheskogo ponimaniya. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2001.
12. Merlo-Ponti M. Fenomenologiya vospriyatiya. SPb.: Yuventa, Nauka, 1999. 1 3 . O b s u zh d aem s t at 'i o kons t r u k t i vi zme (V. P. F i l at ov, I. T. K as a vi n, G. I. R u z a vi n, A . Yu. A n t o n o v s k i i) // E p i s t e m o l o g i ya & f i l o s o f i ya n a u k i . 2 0 0 9 . T. X X . № 2 . S . 1 4 4 –1 5 6 . 14. Ulanovskii A. M. Konstruktivizm, radikal'nyi konstruktivizm, sotsial'nyi konstrukti-vizm: mir kak interpretatsiya // Voprosy psikhologii. 2009. № 2. S. 35–45. 15. Follmer G. Evolyutsionnaya teoriya poznaniya: vrozhdennye struktury poznaniya v kontekste biologii, psikhologii, lingvistiki, filosofii i teorii nauki. M., 1998
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.