MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:
Khanolaynen, D. P.
Esthetics of Reproductions in Modern Art
// Philosophy and Culture.
2013. ¹ 11.
P. 1598-1606.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=63554
Khanolaynen, D. P. Esthetics of Reproductions in Modern Art
Abstract:
The article is devoted to art work during an era of its technical reproduction. The author of the article proves that it is necessary to view reproduced art as a separate category. The aspiration of the author to rethink some tendencies of development in the field of the modern art caused consideration and differentiation of the following concepts: original, copy, reproduction, authenticity, plurality and reproducibility of an artwork. The author of the article proves the thesis that reproduced arts are not ‘original’ in a strict sense of this word. Besides, the concept of explicit versions inspired by ideas of the Canadian professor of philosophy of D. Lopez is developed. The new concept "explicit version" is compared with the traditional terms ‘copy’ and ‘original’. Besides, on the basis of the analysis of different examples of creative works, the author defines interactive art as a special type of reproduced art proving that the result of interaction between the audience and interactive work is an explicit version but not a new original art work.
Keywords:
replication of art work, diverse art, reproduced art, interactive art, computer art, modern art, original, copy, explicit version, authenticity.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here
.
References
1. Lopes D. A Philosophy of Computer Art. – London: Routledge, 2009.
2. Lewis G. E. Too Many Notes: Computers, Complexity and Culture in Voyager // Leonardo Music Journal. – 2000. – Vol. 10. – P. 33-39.
3. Estetika i teoriya iskusstva XX veka. Khrestomatiya / uchebniki i uchebnye posobiya po kul'ture iskusstvu. – M.: ACADEMIA XXI: Progress-traditsiya, 2007.
4. Goodman N. H. Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols. – Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1976.
5. Erokhin S. V. Estetika tsifrovogo izobrazitel'nogo iskusstva. – SPb.: Alteyya, 2010.
6. Erokhin S. V. Problema podlinnosti proizvedeniy tsifrovogo izobrazitel'nogo iskusstva. // Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki. – Tambov, 2008. – Vyp. 10 (66). – S. 159-165.
7. Gel'man M. O tsifrovom iskusstve [Elektronnyy resurs] // Personal'nyy sayt M.Gel'mana. URL: http://www.guelman.ru/artists/mg/original
8. Galkin D. V. Tekhno-khudozhestvennye gibridy, ili proizvedenie iskusstva v epokhu ego komp'yuternogo proizvodstva (V.1.0) // Gumanitarnaya informatika. – Tomsk, 2007. – ¹ 4. – S. 22-38.
9. Berdyaev N. A. Tsarstvo dukha i tsarstvo Kesarya. – Parizh: YMCA press, 1951.
10. Ben'yamin V. Proizvedenie iskusstva v epokhu ego tekhnicheskoy vosproizvodimosti. Izbrannye esse. – M.: Medium, 1966.
11. Mitchell W. J. The Reconfigured Eye: Visual Truth in the Post-photographic Era. – Cambridge MA: The MIT Press, 1994.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
