MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:
Fedotova, V. G., Yakovleva, A. F.
Science as the Phenomenon of Modern (Article No. 2)
// Philosophy and Culture.
2013. № 9.
P. 1299-1306.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=63157
Fedotova, V. G., Yakovleva, A. F. Science as the Phenomenon of Modern (Article No. 2)
Abstract:
This is the continuation of the article ‘Science and Modernization’ published by V. Fedotova and A.
Yakovleva in 2012 (Issue No. 9, P. 63-72). The present article is devoted to transformations in science under
the influence of changing Modern. One of the results of such transformations is the variety of definitions of
science and the ‘battle’ over definition, goals and efficiency of science caused by the effort to influence the organization
of science and education. The author gives an estimation of the current situation of reformation
of Russian science from the point of view of historical experience of functioning of science and social sciences,
in particular, in the first, second and third periods of Modern. Due to the process of reformation of the Russian
Academy of Sciences started by the Russian government, the author of the article analyzes particular
periods in history of organization of science and education and makes conclusions about what is supposed to
substitute for the academic school aimed at obtaining fundamental knowledge.
Keywords:
scientific community, humanitarian knowledge, science, social science, reforms in science, education, organization, personnel grading, forms of Modern, scientist.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here
.
References
1. Stepin V.S. Nauchnoe znanie i tsennosti tekhnogennoy tsivilizatsii // Voprosy filosofii. 1989. № 10.
2. Fedotova V.G., Kolpakov V.A., Fedotova N.N. Global'nyy kapitalizm: Tri velikie transforma-tsii. Sotsial'no-filosofskiy analiz vzaimootnosheniy ekonomiki i obshchestva. M.: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya, 2008.
3. Rozov N.S. (Ne)myslyashchaya Rossiya: antiteoreticheskiy konsensus kak faktor intellektual'noy stagnatsii // Prognozis. 2007. № 3.
4. Fedotova V.G. Shtarnberskaya gruppa (FRG) o zakonomernostyakh razvitiya nauki// Voprosy filo-sofii. 1984. № 3.
5. Tu Veymin. Mnozhestvennost' modernizatsiy i posledstviya etogo yavleniya dlya Vostochnoy Azii // Kul'tura imeet znachenie. Kakim obrazom tsennosti sposobstvuyut obshchestvennomu progressu / Pod red. L. Kharrisona i S. Khantingtona. M., 2002.
6. Chudinov E.M. Priroda nauchnoy istiny. M., 1977.
7. Wagner P. Social Sciences and Social Plannung during the Twentieth Ctntury // The Cambridge History of Science. Vol. 7. The Modern Social Sciences. Ed. by Th. M. Porter, D. Ross. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
8. Wagner P. The Uses of the Social Sciences // The Cambridge History of Science. Vol. 7. The Modern Social Sciences. Ed. by Th. M. Porter, D. Ross. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
