Статья 'Искусство как преступление vs. преступление как искусство. К пониманию московского акционизма 1990-х гг.' - журнал 'Философия и культура' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Chubarov, I. M. Art as a Crime Vs. Crime as Art. Understanding Moscow Actionism of the 1990’s

Abstract: The article is devoted to the difference between the status of legal crime and disturbance of traditional ways of perceiving modern actual art. In order to distinguish between transgression and crime, the author of the article appeals to Nikolay Evreinov’s theory of theatricalization of life, Michel Foucault’s methodological approaches and the relationship between ‘desire’ and ‘law’ described by Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari. The main thesis of the article is that art must not imitate crime by crossing certain illusory borders established by the law because the law forbids much more than such ‘crime’ may violate (Gille Deleuze and Felix Guattari). The law imposes an idea that our desires aresomething forbidden and we can satisfy our desires only if we violate a law and commit a crime. At the same time, the law forbids us illegal actions. The article is devoted to the analysis of actions by modern Russian artists in the 90’s.


Keywords:

philosophy, transgression, crime, desire, law, theatricalization of life, actual art, performance, actionism, illusion.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Delez Zh., Gvattari F. Kapitalizm i shizofreniya. T. 1. Anti-Edip. Ekaterinburg, 2007.
2. Zhizhek S. Vozvyshennyy ob'ekt ideologii. M.: KhZh, 1999.
3. Podoroga V.A. Materialy k psikhobiografii S.M. Eyzenshteyna // Avto-bio-grafiya. Tetradi po analiticheskoy antropologii № 1 / Pod red. V.A. Podoroga. M.: Logos, 2001.
4. Fuko M. Intellektualy i vlast': Izbrannye politicheskie stat'i, vystupleniya i interv'yu / Per. s frants. S. Ofertasa; pod obshch. red. V.P. Vizgina i B.M. Skuratova. M.: Praksis, 2002.
5. Eyzenshteyn S.M. Metod. T. 1. Grundproblem. M.: Muzey kino, 2002
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.