Статья 'Деиндивидуализация как объект социально-философской рефлексии' - журнал 'Философия и культура' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Frolova, M.I. De-individualization as an object for social and philosophical reflection

Abstract: The article contains an attempt to reveal nature, causes and forms of processes of de-individualization of a human being in the situation of global social and anthropological crisis. A human being in a modern age becomes dependent upon various forms of de-individualization (political, economic, media, religious, everyday). The variety of economic offers and political pluralism do not guarantee individual freedom. Rather, they mask the lack of freedom. The thinkers, who wrote about de-individualization of a human being pointed out that the main reason for it was lack of ability and wish to follow the high values. Aiming solely for success, an individual cannot find himself. Neither hypertrorphy Ego, nor dissolved Ego may bring happiness to a person. Such a tragic alternative serves as a basis for deviations, which are so common in the modern society. The nature of the de-individualization processes is that mass society forces a person to make his personality into the means for achieving success, which makes self-development a secondary factor.


Keywords:

global social and anthropological crisis, human individuality, alienation, manipulation, freedom, dialogue, Fromm, Ortega-i-Gasset, Heyzinga, Buber, Markuze.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Anchel E. Mify potryasennogo soznaniya. M., 1979.
2. Bek U. Obshchestvo riska. M., 2000.
3. Kamyu A. Buntuyushchiy chelovek. M., 1990.
4. Marks K., Engel's F. Sochineniya. 2-izd. T. 42.
5. Markuze G. Odnomernyy chelovek. M., 1994.
6. Mun'e E. Personalizm. M., 1992.
7. Ortega-i-Gasset Kh. Degumanizatsiya iskusstva. M., 1991.
8. Fromm E. Psikhoanaliz i etika. M., 1993.
9. Fromm E. Begstvo ot svobody. M., 1990.
10. Fromm E. Muzhchina i zhenshchina. M., 1998.
11. Kheyzinga Y. Homo ludens. V teni zavtrashnego dnya. M., 1992.
12. Sheler M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. M., 1994.
13. Yaspers K. Smysl i naznachenie istorii. M., 1991
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.