Статья 'Проблема теодицеи в этике И. Канта и Ф.М. Достоевского' - журнал 'Философия и культура' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Mekhed, G. N. The Problem of Theodicy in Kant’s and Dostoevsky’s Ethics

Abstract: The article is devoted to theodicy and its role in Kant’s and Dostoevsky’s philosophies. The author of the article tries to show that the problem of theodicy appeared in Kant’s and Dostoevsky’s work as a part of the question about the moral ideal, freedom and responsibility. Despite different approaches and quite obvious difference in their concepts of rationality as well as philosophizing methods, both of these philosophers have many topics in common. In particular, they both talked about the relation between the absolute and personal freedom, from one side, and the problem of the moral idea form the other. Both Kant and Dostoevsky were also interested in the problem of self-will and how it relates to freedom and autonomy. However, despite the philosophers’ belief that it was impossible to solve the problem of theodicy, the author shows that Kant and Dostoevsky had very different definitions of freedom as well as borders and logic of moral reasoning.


Keywords:

philosophy, ethics, Kant, Dostoevsky, theodicy, freedom, absolute, autonomy, ideal, morals.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Berdyaev N.A. Mirosozertsanie Dostoevskogo. M.: AST, 2007.
2. Beme Ya. O troystvennoy zhizni cheloveka. Ufa, 2011.
3. Golosovker Ya.E. Dostoevskiy i Kant. M., 1963.
4. Dostoevskiy F.M. Poln. sobr. soch. v 30 t. L.: Nauka, 1973.
5. Dostoevskiy F.M. Brat'ya Karamazovy. V 2 t. M., 1958.
6. Evlampiev I.I. Antropologiya Dostoevskogo [elektronnyy resurs] // http://anthropology.rchgi.spb. ru/dostoev/dostoevsk_i2.htm
7. Kant I. Sobr. soch. v 8-i t. M., 1994.
8. Kantor V.K. Ispoved' i teoditseya v tvorchestve Dostoevskogo (retseptsiya Avreliya Avgustina) // Vo-prosy filosofii. 2011. № 4.
9. Maler A. Transtsendental'naya teologiya Kanta [elektronnyy resurs] // http://www.katehon.ru/html/ top/philosophia/transcendentalnaya_teologia_kanta.htm.
10. Protopopov I.A. Svoboda i ponyatie zla v «Religii v predelakh tol'ko razuma» Kanta. SPb., 2010.
11. Frank S.L. Nepostizhimoe. M., 2007.
12. Cherkasova E. Dostoevsky and Kant: dialogues on ethics. N.Y.-Amsterdam, 2009
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.