MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:
Gogotishvili, L. A.
‘Russian and European Philosophies’ Seminar (Part Three). Three-Day Discussion about the ‘Modern Type’ of the Philosophical
Thought
// Philosophy and Culture.
2013. № 5.
P. 650-655.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=62666
Gogotishvili, L. A. ‘Russian and European Philosophies’ Seminar (Part Three). Three-Day Discussion about the ‘Modern Type’ of the Philosophical
Thought
Abstract:
The first part of this publication contains the overview of F. Laruelle’s speech ‘Toward Philosophy
Recognized as Modern’ and its discussion during the Russian-French seminar held in Jerusalem in March
2013. The second part contains L. A. Gogotishvili’s article ‘Losev’s Philosophy of Language and Laruelle’s
Non-Philosophy of Language’. A. Losev’s and F. Laruelle’s language conceptions are compared against the
problem of operational-thematic expressions in philosophy. The question about whether there is a certain
cause and effect relationship between viewing the language as the central operational source and the decrease
of philosophy thematism is deemed to have no solution because the linguistic operationality and
direct thematism have different purposes of discursive strategies. Based on the comparison of Losev’s and
Laruelle’s operational principles (clipped monism and one-sided dualism), Gogotishvili reconstructs discursive
strategies established by the two philosophers.
Keywords:
philosophy, Laruelle, Losev, thematic invention, operationality, one-sided dualism, monism, discursive strategies, eidetic language, transcendent language.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here
.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
