MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:
Danielian, N. V.
Role of Constructivism under Conditions of Transfer from Information Society to the Knowledge
Society
// Philosophy and Culture.
2012. № 9.
P. 112-119.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=61440
Danielian, N. V. Role of Constructivism under Conditions of Transfer from Information Society to the Knowledge
Society
Abstract:
The given article is devoted to the increasing role of constructivism in the process of transfer from the information
society to the knowledge society. The author analyzes the term ‘knowledge society’ based on publications by
different philosophers and defines the main difference between the information society and the knowledge society to
be the usage of non-scientific knowledge. In a new society the border between science, society and social culture are
erased. Based on the analysis of the main views of certain famous philosophers on the process of education the author
makes the suggestion that the purpose of education is now becoming the formation of human as he is. This means we
have to refuse from using formal information and start to use ‘living knowledge’. The author makes a conclusion that
being one of the forms of knowledge organization, construction also means the ability to build a new order which
would answer a person’s goal. Thus, in knowledge society the term ‘knowledge’ is understood as the encompassing by
the reality which is continuously turning into the construct of scientific and cognitive activity.
Keywords:
philosophy, knowledge, society, information, entity, reality, education, science, constructivism.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here
.
References
1. Bekhmann N. Obshchestvo znaniya — kratkiy obzor teoreticheskikh poiskov // Voprosy filosofii. 2010. №
2. S. 113-126. 2. Gershunskiy B. S. Filosofiya obrazovaniya dlya XXI veka. M.: Pedagogicheskoe obshchestvo Rossii, 2002. 512 s.
3. Gorokhov V.G. Nauchno-tekhnicheskaya politika v obshchestve ne-znaniya // Voprosy filosofii. 2007. № 12. S. 65-80.
4. Gorts A. Znanie, stoimost' i kapital. K kritike ekonomiki znaniy // Logos. 2007. № 4 (61). S. 5-63.
5. Gorts A. Nematerial'noe. Znanie, stoimost' i kapital. M.: Izdatel'skiy dom Gosudarstvennogo universiteta Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki, 2010. 208 s.
6. Efremenko D.V. Kontseptsiya obshchestva znaniya kak teoriya sotsial'nykh transformatsiy: dostizheniya i problemy // Voprosy filosofii. 2010. № 1. S. 49-61.
7. Lektorskiy V.A. Filosofiya, obshchestvo znaniya i perspektivy cheloveka // Voprosy filosofii. 2010. №
8. S. 30-34. 8. Pol're B. Kognitivnyy kapitalizm na marshe // Politicheskiy zhurnal. 2008. № 2. S. 66-72.
9. Pruzhinin B.I., Shchedrina T.G. Konstruktivizm kak umonastroenie i kak metodologiya // Konstruk-tivistskiy podkhod v epistemologii i naukakh o cheloveke / Otv. red. V.A. Lektorskiy. M.: “Kanon +” ROOI “Reabilitatsiya”, 2009. S. 354-365.
10. Rumyantsev O.K. Vosproizvedenie i konstruirovanie v evropeyskoy mysli // Metamorfozy razuma v evropeyskoy kul'ture: k filosofskim istokam sovremennykh problem obrazovaniya / Otv. red. O.K. Rumyantsev. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2010. S. 289-400.
11. Bechmann G. Concepts of Information Society and the Social Function of Information.// Towards the Information Society / Edited by G. Banse. Berlin: Springer, 2000. P. 37-52.
12. Drucker P.F. Post-capital society. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1993. 232 p.
13. Stehr N. Arbeit, Eigentum und Wissen: Zur Theorie von Wissengesellschaften. Frankfurt-am-Main: Suhrkamp, 1994. 261 s.
14. Weingart P. Die Stunde der Wahrheit? Zum Verhältnis der Wissenschaft zu Politik, Wirtschaft und Medien in der Wissengesellschaft. Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft, 2001. 348 s
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|