Статья 'Моделирование как инструмент онтологии к гносеологии культуры' - журнал 'Философия и культура' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Amelchenko, S. N. Modeling as an Instrument of Ontology and Cultural Gnoseology

Abstract: Method of modeling is not studied enough and rarely used in modern ontology and cultural gnoseology. A rare example of this method is M. Kagan’s conception describing the place of culture in the system of human existence. Some of Kagan’s ideas can be developed and compelted which would allow to make changes in the process of formation of objective knowledge in culture. This is the goal of the research of the structure of ontological system that includes existence of objectivized and individual ideal approaches (elements not mentioned by Kagan). The author of the article shows that this is the part of existence (human being) where meaning, ideals and life goals of human and society are being produced. The research also shows a dialectic connection between structure of existence (which levels and forms are conditioned by the formation of culture) and the role of culture causing the variety of these elements and creating a representation of such existence elements as the human, social and ideal.


Keywords:

philosophy, culture, being, modeling, human, society nature, system, ideal, social, material.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Vindel'band V. Izbrannoe. Dukh i istoriya. M., 1995.
2. Gartman N. Problema dukhovnogo bytiya // Kul'turologiya. KhKh vek: Antologiya. M., 1995. S. 608-648.
3. Gurevich P.S. Filosofiya kul'tury. M., 1995.
4. Dil'tey V. Vvedenie v nauki o dukhe // Sobr. soch. V 6 t. M., 2000. T. 1.
5. Dubenskaya Yu.Yu., Osokin Yu.V. Model' kul'tury // Kul'turologiya. Entsiklopediya. V 2 t. M., 2007. T. 1. S. 1352-1357.
6. Dyurkgeym E. Sotsiologiya. Ee predmet, metod, prednaznachenie. M., 1995.
7. Kagan M.S. Filosofiya kul'tury. SPb, 1996.
8. Mostova L.A. Universal'naya model' kul'tury // Kul'turologiya. Entsiklopediya. V 2 t. M., 2007. T. 2. S. 762-764.
9. Popper K. R. Logika i rost nauchnogo znaniya. M., 1983.
10. Riker P. Germenevtika. Etika. Politika. M., 1995.
11. Rikkert G. Nauki o prirode i nauki o kul'ture. M., 1998.
12. Sorokin P.A. Chelovek. Tsivilizatsiya. Obshchestvo. M., 1992.
13. Fromm E. Chelovek dlya sebya. Imet' ili byt'? M., 1990.
14. Khaydegger M. Vremya i bytie. M., 1993.
15. Chavchavadze N.Z. Kul'tura i tsennosti. Tbilisi, 1984.
16. Tenbruck F.H. Repräsentative Kultur // Sozialstruktur und Kultur / Hrsg. H. Hafertkamp, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1990
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.