Статья 'О некоторых особенностях передачи русской литературной классики в кино- и театральных образах' - журнал 'Философия и культура' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Toporina, E. A. Concerning Some Peculiarities of Interpreting Russian Literature Classics Through Cinema and Theatre Images

Abstract: The article concerns some peculiarities of interpretation of Russian classics through other forms of art such as cinema and theatre which are connected with the role of the art symbol and image in interpretation of the national literature tradition. The transfer of image, its comprehension closely relates to the understanding of the national literature tradition and its peculiarities. Due to that the following images are of special interest: insanity, fate, artistic quotes. The article is based on the analysis of concrete Russian classical texts and some cinema and theatre production. It is concluded that addressing to images and symbols ‘connects’ different forms of art and allows to better understand the classical literature text.


Keywords:

philosophy, culture, esthetics, interpretation, art, literature, symbol, image, theatre, cinema.


This article is unavailable for unregistered users. Click to login or register

References
1. Arutyunov S.M. Ekranizatsiya literaturnykh proizvedeniy kak spetsificheskiy tip vzaimodeystviya iskusstv. — M., 2003.
2. Ar'es F. Chelovek pered litsom smerti. — M., 1992.
3. Bem A.L. «Igrok» Dostoevskogo. (V svete novykh biograficheskikh dannykh) // Sovremennye zapiski. Kn. 24. — Parizh, 1925.
4. Voropaev V.A. Nikolay Gogol': opyt dukhovnoy biografii. — M., 2008.
5. Gachev G.D. Natsional'nye obrazy mira. — M.: Sovetskiy pisatel', 1988.
6. Dostoevskiy F.M. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy v 30-i tt. T. 11. — L., 1972.
7. Karasev L.V. Ontologicheskiy vzglyad na russkuyu literaturu. — M., 1995.
8. Kroo K. Tvorcheskoe slovo Dostoevskogo — geroy, tekst, intertekst. — SPb, 2005.
9. Losev A.F. Logika simvola/ Filosofiya. Mifologiya. Kul'tura. — M., 1991.
10. Lotman Yu.M. Simvol v sisteme kul'tury // Lotman Yu.M. Izbrannye stat'i. T. 1. — Tallinn, 1992.
11. Moem U.S. Podvodya itogi (Esse, ocherki). — M., 1991.
12. Pechko L.P. Stili iskusstva: esteticheskie konteksty. — Elets, 2010.
13. Podoroga V.A. Mimesis. T. 1. Gogol', Dostoevskiy. — M., 2006.
14. Pushkin A.S. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy. T. 4. — M., 1954.
15. Frank S.L. Russkoe mirovozzrenie / Dukhovnye osnovy obshchestva. — M., 1992.
16. Shklovskiy V.B. Za i protiv. Zametki o Dostoevskom. — M., 1957.
17. Eko U. Otkrytoe proizvedenie. — SPb., 2004
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.