|
MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:
Amelchenko, S. N.
Modes of ‘the Must’ and ‘the Arrant’ in Contradictions between Modernity and Post-Modernism
// Philosophy and Culture.
2011. № 5.
P. 176-186.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=58426
Amelchenko, S. N. Modes of ‘the Must’ and ‘the Arrant’ in Contradictions between Modernity and Post-Modernism
Abstract:
Using the universals ‘the arrant’ and ‘the must’ allows to define additional aspects of the study of hidden contradictions
between Modernity and Post-Modernism as well as to determine the basis for eliminating them.
Keywords:
philosophy, culture, the arrant, the must, Modernity, Post-Modernism, code, modus, industrialism, post-industrialism.
References
1. Agatstsi E. Chelovek kak predmet filosofskogo poznaniya // O chelovecheskom v cheloveke / pod red. I.T. Frolova. M., 1991. S. 59-79.
2. Bell D. Gryadushchee postindustrial'noe obshchestvo. M., 1999.
3. Bodriyyar Zh. Prozrachnost' zla. M., 2006.
4. Veber M. Protestantskaya etika i dukh kapitalizma // Veber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. M., 1990. S. 61-272.
5. Giddens E. Transformatsiya intimnosti. SPb., 2004.
6. Derrida Zh. Vokrug vavilonskikh bashen. SPb., 2002.
7. Derrida Zh. «Nakonets-to nauchit'sya zhit'» (poslednee interv'yu) // Voprosy filosofii. 2005. № 4. S. 133-144.
8. Zimmel' G. Konflikt sovremennoy kul'tury // Zimmel' G. Izbrannoe: v 2-kh tt. T. 1. Filosofiya kul'tury. M., 1996. S. 494-516.
9. Liotar Zh.-F. Zametka o smyslakh «post» // Inostrannaya literatura. 1994. № 1. S. 56-59.
10. Liotar Zh.-F. Sostoyanie postmoderna. SPb., 1998.
11. Panarin A.S. Postmodernizm i globalizatsiya: proekt osvobozhdeniya sobstvennikov ot sotsial'nykh i natsional'nykh obyazatel'stv // Voprosy filosofii. 2003. № 6. S. 16-36.
12. Pelipenko A.A., Yakovenko I.G. Kul'tura kak sistema. M., 1998.
13. Pechchei A. Chelovecheskie kachestva. M., 1985.
14. Silichev D. A. Sotsial'nye posledstviya perekhoda ot industrializma i moderna k postindustrializmu i postmodernu // Voprosy filosofii. 2005. № 7. S. 3-20.
15. Sudakov A.K. Dolzhnoe i sushchee // Etika: Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar' / pod red. R. G. Apresyana A.A. Guseynova. M., 2001. S. 123-125.
16. Toffler E. Tret'ya volna. M., 2002.
17. Fedotova V. G. Neklassicheskie modernizatsii i al'ternativy modernizatsionnoy teorii // Voprosy filosofii. 2002. № 12. S. 3-21.
18. Fromm E. Imet' ili byt'? M., 1990.
19. Fukuyama F. Konets istorii i posledniy chelovek. M., 2004.
20. Khaydegger M. Bytie i vremya. SPb., 2002.
21. Khantington S. Stolknovenie tsivilizatsiy. M., 2003.
22. Khorkkhaymer M., Adorno T. Dialektika Prosveshcheniya. M.-SPb., 1997.
23. Chavchavadze N.Z. Kul'tura i tsennosti. Tbilisi, 1984.
24. Engel's F. Dialektika prirody // Marks K., Engel's F. Soch. T. 20. S. 339-626.
25. Apel K.-O. Transformation der Philosophie. Frankkfurt a. M., 1988. Bd. 2.
26. Freund W. Modernus und andere Zeitbegriffe des Mittelalters. Köln, 1957.
27. Giddens A. The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1990.
28. Griffin D.R. The Reenchantment of Science. N.Y., 1988.
29. Habermas J. The Theory of Communicative Action. Cambridge, 1984.
30. Jameson F. Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. L., 1992.
31. Marcuse H. One dimensional Man. N. Y. 1970.
32. Taylor M. C. Descartes, Nietzsche and the Search for the Unsayable // The New York Review of Books. 1987, febr. 1.
33. The Fontana Dictionary of Modern Thought. Glasgo, 1981.
34. Turner B. S. Periodization and Politics Postmodern // Turner B. S. (Ed.) Theories of Modernity and Postmodernity. L., 1995.
35. Welsch W. Postmoderne — Pluralitat als ethischer und politischer Wert. Köln, 1988
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
|
