MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:
Balagushkin, E. G.
Morphology of Mysticism. Article 2
// Philosophy and Culture.
2010. № 1.
P. 61-66.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=57175
Balagushkin, E. G. Morphology of Mysticism. Article 2
Abstract:
The thesis of ‘uniform’ mysticism ignores the forms typical for paganism and developed religions. Even though mysticism still has the same nature and origin, it definitely varies greatly in forms and structures. The author defined the five ‘primary’ structures of mysticism (archetypes): unity with God, Godsend, transcendental and immanent mystical determinations and the bipolar immanent and transcendental mystical bond. According to the author, primary configurations of the mystical bond usually join in structural complexes.
Keywords:
philosophy, mysticism, complex, morphology, sacred, structure, archetype, transcendental, immanent
References
1. Balagushkin E.G. Netraditsionnye religii v sovremennoy Rossii. Ch. — M: IF RAN. 1999.1.
2. Balagushkin E.G. Netraditsionnye religii v sovremennoy Rossii. Ch. — M., IF2. RAN. 2002.
3. Balagushkin E.G. Problemy morfologicheskogo analiza religiy. — M., IF RAN. 2003.
4. Knysh A.D. Musul'manskiy mistitsizm. Kratkaya istoriya. — M.-SPb., 2004.
5. Kravchenko V. Vestniki russkogo mistitsizma. — M.: 1997.
6. Merezhkovskiy D.S. Ispanskie mistiki. — Tomsk. 1997.
7. Mistika. Religiya. Nauka. Klassiki mirovogo religiovedeniya. Antologiya. — M.: 1998.
8. Mistitsizm: problemy analiza i kritika / Vopr. nauchn. ateizma. Vyp. 3— M.: 1989.8.
9. Moss M. Sotsial'nye funktsii svyashchennogo. — SPb. 2000.
10. Uolsh R. Dukh shamanizma. — SPb. 1996.
11. Evans-Ventts U.Y. Velikiy yog Tibeta Milarepa. — Samara, 1998.
12. Entsiklopediya mistitsizma. — SPb.: Izd. «Litera». 1996.
13. Entsiklopediya tantry. — M., 1997.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
