|
MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:
Grebenshchikova E.G.
// Philosophy and Culture.
2011. № 8.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2011.8.4036 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=4036
Трансдисциплинарные стратегии коммуникации рисков
Grebenshchikova Elena Georgievna
Doctor of Philosophy
Head of the Center of Scientific Information and Research on Science, Education and Technologies, Institute for Scientific Information on Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Science
117997, Russia, g. Moscow, Nakhimovskii prospekt, 51/21
|
Aika45@yandex.ru
|
|
 |
Other publications by this author
|
|
|
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2011.8.4036
Received:
18-07-2011
Published:
1-8-2011
References
1. Behmann G. Sovremennoe obschestvo: obschestvo riska, informacionnoe obschestvo, obschestvo znaniy. M., 2010.
2. Bek U. Kriticheskaya teoriya mirovogo obschestva riska. Kosmopoliticheskiy vzglyad na problemu [Elektronnyy resurs] // PROGNOZIΣ. 2009. № 2 (18) URL: http://www.intelros.ru/readroom/prognosis/pr_2-2009 (data obrascheniya 06.06. 2011)
3. Giddens E.Sud'ba, risk i bezopasnost' // Thesis. 1994. Vyp. 5.
4. Kiyaschenko L.P., Tischenko P.D. Gumanitarnaya ekspertiza: germenevtika sub'ektnosti // Lichnost'. Kul'tura. Obschestvo. 2011. T. XIII. Vyp. 2. №№ 63-64. S. 152-165.
5. Luman N. Ponyatie riska // THESIS, 1994. № 5. S. 139.
6. Yudin B.G., Lukov Val. A. Gumanitarnaya ekspertiza. [Elektronnyy resurs] URL: http://www.hdirussia.ru/69 (data obrascheniya 06.06. 2011)
7. Barben D. Analyzing acceptance politics: Towards an epistemological shift in the public understanding of science and technology [Elektronnyy resurs] // Public Understand. Sci. 2010. 19(3) URL: http://pus.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/3/274 (data obrascheniya 06.06. 2011)
8. Collins, H.M., Evans, R. The Third Wave of Science Studies: Studies of Expertise and Experience [Elektronnyy resurs] //Social Studies of Science. 2002. 32; 235 URL: http://sss.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/32/2/235 (data obrascheniya 06.06. 2011)
9. Fischer, F. Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge. Durham, NC, London, 2000.
10. Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., Read, S. & Combs, B. How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sciences, 1978. 9 (2).
11. Flinterman, F.J. et al. Transdisciplinarity: the new challenge for biomedical research. // Bulletin of science, technology and society 2001. 21 (4). P. 253-266.
12. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., Trow, M. The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage, 2008.
13. Kates R.W. and Kasperson J.X. Comparative Risk Analysis of Technological Hazards // Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 1983, v.80.
14. Knight F. Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit. NY. 2006.
15. Lewenstein, B.V. Models of public communication of science and technology. [Elektronnyy resurs] URL: http://www.dgdc.unam.mx/Assets/pdfs/sem_feb04.pdf (data obrascheniya 06.06. 2011)
16. Luhmann N. Die wirtschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt/M. 1988.
17. Rabinowitch E. Living dangerously in age of science // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 1972. Vol. 28. № 1.
18. Power, M. The audit society: rituals of verification. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1999
19. Pohl, C., Hadorn, G.H. Principles for Designing Transdisciplinary Research. Munich, 2007.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
|
