Текст или палимпсест города?

Артеменко Андрей Павлович

doi:10.7256/2454-0757.2017.1.21491


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture

Reference:

Artemenko A.P. Text or palimpsest of the city? // Philosophy and Culture. 2017. № 1. P. 40-46. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2017.1.21491 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=21491

Текст или палимпсест города?

Artemenko Andrii Pavlovich

Doctor of Philosophy

Professor, the department of Cultural Menegment and Social Technologies, Kharkiv State Academy of Culture

61106, Ukraine, Khar'kovskaya oblast', g. Khar'kov, ul. Roganskaya, 20-a

prof.artemenko@mail.ru

Article was published in rubric "Social philosophy"

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2017.1.21491

Received:

20-12-2016

Published:

10-03-2017

Abstract: The subject of this research is the analysis of methodological approaches towards examination of the urban space. The goal of this work consists in development of the methodological complex that combines various angles of the review and approaches towards explanation of the phenomenon of city. Special attention is given to the concept of topos, idea of the contingency of space, analysis of the notion of “objectness”, which form the foundation of the topology of urban space. The city is presented as a derivative of sustainable multiplicities and relation networks. The author suggest the original concept of “palimpsest of the urban space”. The process of “erasing” physical objects of the city leads to the changes in the associated with them processes and projections. Application of the new text does not always thoroughly cover up the previous inscriptions, compelling to read the extruding text. The flatness attains the depth, and combination of the prospects becomes a vital demand. The conclusion is made that the urban space possesses the characteristic of the objectness, which is the correlation of the dynamic objects. The author determines the types of palimpsest: civilizational palimpsest; palimpsests of the ethnically controversial territories; and palimpsest of the previous capital.

Keywords:

urban study, city, urban space, Actor-Network Theory, palimpsest, text, objectness, topos, topology, contingency

References

1. Adorno V. Teodor. Esteticheskaya teoriya. / per. s nem. A. V. Dranova. M.: Respublika, 2001. 527 s.
2. Aristotel'. Fizika // Soch. v 4 t. M: Mysl', 1981. – T. 3. S. 59-262.
3. Artemenko A. P. Topologіya Ya v merezherikh strukturakh sotsіumu. — Kharkіv: Persha tsifrova drukarnya, 2013. – 344 s.
4. Vakhshtain V. S. Peresborka goroda: mezhdu yazykom i prostranstvom // Sotsiologiya a.Vlasti. 2014 № 2 S. 9-38.
5. Vakhshtain V. S. Metafory goroda i metaforika gorodskikh issledovanii: samoopisanie vs. metaopisanie // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. 2015. 1. C. 32-49. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2015.1.13173.
6. Gadamer G.-Kh. Istina i metod. M.: Inostrannaya literatura, 1988. 704 s.
7. Zimmel' G. Ruina // Izbrannoe T. 2. Sozertsanie zhizni. – M.: Yurist, 1996. S. 227-233.
8. Zimmel' G. Rama kartiny. Esteticheskii opit. // Sotsiologiya veshchei: sbornik statei / pod red. V. Vakhshtaina. M.: Izdatel'skii dom «Territoriya budushchego», 2006. S. 48-54.
9. Kastel's M. Informatsionnaya epokha: ekonomika, obshchestvo i kul'tura /per. s angl. O. Shkaratana. M.: GUVESh, 2000. 608 s.
10. Knorr-Tsetina K. Sotsial'nost' i ob''ekty. Sotsial'nye otnosheniya v postsotsial'nykh obshchestvakh znaniya. // Sotsiologiya veshchei: sbornik statei / pod red. V. Vakhshtaina. M.: Izdatel'skii dom «Territoriya budushchego», 2006. S. 267-306.
11. Koptseva N.P., Sertakova E.A. Summa metodov sovremennoi urbanisticheskoi antropologii: postanovka problemy // Urbanistika. 2015. № 2. S.40-53. DOI: 10.7256/2310-8673.2015.2.16354. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/urb/article_16354.html (data obrashcheniya: 10.12.2016)
12. Lo Dzh. Ob''ekty i prostranstva. //Sotsiologiya veshchei: sbornik statei / pod red. V. Vakhshtaina – M.: Izdatel'skii dom «Territoriya budushchego», 2006. – S. 223-244.
13. Lefevr A. Idei dlya kontseptsii novogo urbanizma.// Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie, 2002 2 (3). C. 19-27.
14. Linch K. Obraz goroda / per. s angl. V. L. Glazycheva. M.: Stroiizdat, 1982. 328 s.
15. Mamardashvili M. Kantianskie variatsii. – M.: «Agraf», 1997. 320 s.
16. Merlo-Ponti M. Fenomenologiya vospriyatiya SPb.: «Yuventa»-«Nauka», 1999. 608 s.
17. Serto M. de Izobretenie povsednevnosti. SPb.: Izdatel'stvo Evropeiskogo universiteta v Sankt-Peterburge, 2013. 330s.
18. Serto M. Po gorodu peshkom // Communitas. – 2005. –№ 2.– S. 80-87.
19. Sitnikova A. A. K voprosu o metodologii issledovanii kul'tury kak sotsial'no-antropologicheskoi sistemy // Sotsiodinamika. – 2015. 1. C. 75-100. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7144.2015.1.14237. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_14237.html (data obrashcheniya: 10.12.2016)
20. Fil'ko A. Izuchenie fenomena goroda i gorodskogo prostranstva v sovremennykh sotsial'nykh issledovaniyakh (istoriograficheskii obzor) // Sotsiodinamika. 2015. 7. C. 51-64. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7144.2015.7.15933. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_15933.html (data obrashcheniya: 10.12.2016

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.