|
MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:
Korotkikh V.I.
“Haecceity” as the subject of default: to the question of the relation of A. F. Losev to the transcendental-speculative philosophy of Hegel
// Philosophy and Culture.
2016. № 10.
P. 1395-1402.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2016.10.19977 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=19977
«Конкретность» как предмет умолчания: к вопросу об отношении А. Ф. Лосева к трансцендентально-спекулятивной философии Гегеля
Korotkikh Vyacheslav Ivanovich
Doctor of Philosophy
professor of the Department of Philosophy and Social Sciences at Yelets State University N. A. Ivan Bunin
399770, Russia, Lipetskaya oblast', g. Elets, ul. Komsomol'skaya, 58, kv. 4
|
shortv@yandex.ru
|
|
|
Other publications by this author |
|
|
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2016.10.19977
Received:
04-08-2016
Published:
14-11-2016
Abstract:
This article explores the relation of A. F. Losev to the transcendental understanding of being in the philosophy of Hegel. Basing on the observation of V. O. Troitsky, according to which the Russian philosopher avoids using the notion of “haecceity”, the author reveals the position of A. F. Loves regarding Hegel’s philosophy, as well as underlines the specificities of Russian philosophy in the global historical-philosophical process. Special attention is given to the analysis of Hegel’s concept of the structure of reasoning, as well as Losev’s doctrine on correlation of the symbol and artistic image. The author proves that the noted by the Russian researcher peculiarity of Losev’s use of the philosophical terminology is caused by the nonrandom factors, but rather its fundamental position on the key issue of ontology. For the first time in scientific literature, the author reveals the peculiarities of the aesthetical doctrines of the German and Russian philosophers that are substantiated by their ontological preferences. This work also reconstructs the historical-cultural context of the differences, detected between the philosophers, in the assessments of opportunity regarding the philosophical cognition of the Absolute.
Keywords:
Haecceity, A. F. Losev, Hegel, transcendentalism, structure of reasoning, certainty, symbolism, symbol, artistic image, specificities of the Russian philosophy
References
1. Fuko M. Slova i veshchi. Arkheologiya gumanitarnykh nauk. SPb.: A-cad, 1994. 404 s.
2. Troitskii V. P. Razyskaniya o zhizni i tvorchestve A. F. Loseva. M.: Agraf, 2007. 448 s.
3. Losev A. F. Vladimir Solov'ev i ego vremya. M.: Progress, 1990. 720 s.
4. Gegel' G. V. F. Entsiklopediya filosofskikh nauk. T. 3. Filosofiya dukha. M.: Mysl', 1977. 471 s.
5. Gegel' G. V. F. Sistema nauki. Ch. 1. Fenomenologiya dukha // Sochineniya. T. IV. M.: Izd-vo sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoi literatury, 1959. 440 s.
6. Gogotishvili L. A. Losevskaya kontseptsiya predikativnosti // Losev A. F. Lichnost' i absolyut. M.: Mysl', 1999. S. 770-795.
7. Losev A. F. Filosofiya imeni. M.: Izdatel'stvo Moskovskogo universiteta, 1990. 269 s.
8. Losev A. F. Nekotorye voprosy iz istorii uchenii o stile // Losev A. F. Problema khudozhestvennogo stilya. – Kiev: «Collegium», «Kievskaya Akademiya Evrobiznesa», 1994. S. 2-168.
9. Gegel' G. V. F. Sochineniya. T. XII. Lektsii po estetike. Kn. 1. M.: Gosudarstvennoe sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoe izdatel'stvo, 1938. 471 s.
10. Losev A. F. Problema simvola i realisticheskoe iskusstvo. M.: Iskusstvo, 1995. 320 s.
11. Hegel G. W. F. Phänomenologie des Geistes. Stuttgart: Philipp Reclam jun, 1987. 596 S.
12. R.K. Omel'chuk Aleksei Fedorovich Losev: zhizn' v mife // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2013. - 5. - C. 424 - 432. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2013.5.8302.
13. E.M. Spirova Mif i simvol v protsesse postizheniya cheloveka // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2011. - 10. - C. 34 - 41.
14. R.K. Omel'chuk Ontologiya very v svete filosofskogo naslediya A.F. Loseva // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2011. - 11. - C. 15 - 25.
15. Gogotishvili L.A. Vklad postsimvolistov Loseva i Bakhtina v teoriyu postroeniya diskursa (printsipial'nye razlichiya na fone fundamental'nogo skhodstva) // Filologiya: nauchnye issledovaniya. - 2014. - 4. - C. 354 - 368. DOI: 10.7256/2305-6177.2014.4.13430.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
|