|
MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:
Gladyshev V.I., Penner R.V.
Culture of communication in the era of modern media
// Philosophy and Culture.
2016. № 9.
P. 1268-1276.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2016.9.19629 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=19629
Культура общения в эпоху современных медиа
Gladyshev Vladimir Ivanovich
Doctor of Philosophy
Professor, the department of Philosophy, South Ural State University
454080, Russia, Chelyabinsk, Prospekt Lenina 76, office 434
|
gladyshev1947@mail.ru
|
|
|
|
Penner Regina Vladimirovna
PhD in Philosophy
Docent, the department of Philosophy, South Ural State University
454091, Russia, Chelyabinsk, Sovetskaya Street 36
|
penner.r.v@gmail.com
|
|
|
|
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2016.9.19629
Received:
03-07-2016
Published:
24-10-2016
Abstract:
The object of research is the phenomenon of communication in the context of media. The subject is the problem of harmonization of communication in terms of media-modernity. The authors begin their study with analizing the phenomenon of "digital natives" who violates the centuries-old tradition of generating and transmitting knowledge from elders to youth. Considering communication as the interaction, the authors identify the following features of it, which are the key in the context of the study: the nature of verbal communication; communicant's freedom and responsibility for the field of communication and his (her) role in it; communication as a necessary form of existence of homo sapiens; communication as a mutually beneficial interaction between people. Addressing to the phenomenon of media, the authors dwell on these effects in the media reality: the acceleration of information; simplification of information; "dissolution" of human in the information stream. The research methodology includes scientific methods of analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, generalization, abstraction. In addition, the procedure is carried out methodological conceptualization. A special contribution of the authors of the study is to identify communication requirements for the "new" reality to a human who is falling into a situation of communication. Among them should be marked: emotional reinforcement; selectivity in communication; overcoming narcissism and conformism; tolerance in communication; communicative activity and the attractiveness of the subject of communication; competence in communication.
Keywords:
communication, interaction, media, media-modernity, digital aborigens, digital immigrants, compensatory communication, culture of communication, media effects, information field
References
1. Aristotel'. Bol'shaya etika // Soch. V 4 t. T. 4. M.: Mysl', 1984. 830 s.
2. Borodin, P. A. K voprosu ob osnovnykh tsennostyakh v kul'ture obshcheniya // Al'manakh sovremennoi nauki i obrazovaniya. 2012. № 4. S. 37-40.
3. Buber, M. Ya i Ty // Dva obraza very. M.: Respublika, 1995. 464 s. S. 16-92
4. Gladyshev, V. I. Kompensatornoe obshchenie cheloveka s prirodoi kak sposob smyagcheniya odinochestva // V. I. Gladyshev, A. V. Kuznetsova. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2014. № 17 (346). S. 65-75.
5. Gozman, L. Ya. Psikhologiya emotsional'nykh otnoshenii. M.: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta, 1987. 120 s.
6. Grednovskaya, E. V. Problema podlinnosti sushchestvovaniya cheloveka v diskursakh ekzistentsializma i postmodernizma // E. V. Grednovskaya, R. V. Penner. Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Sotsial'no-gumanitarnye nauki. 2015. T. 15. № 3. S. 56-60.
7. Dydrov, A. A. Chelovek bessmertnyi: religioznaya fiktsiya ili budushchee nauki? // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2015. № 391. S. 76-79.
8. Zorkaya, N. M. Unikal'noe i tirazhirovannoe. M.: Iskusstvo, 1981. 167 s.
9. Kamper, D. Telo. Nasilie. Bol' : Sbornik statei. SPb.: Izd-vo Russkoi khristianskoi gumanitarnoi akademii, 2010. 174 s.
10. Korolenko, Ts. P. Sem' putei k katastrofe: Destruktivnoe povedenie v sovremennom mire // Ts. P. Korolenko, T. A. Donskikh. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1990. S. 5-17.
11. Lebedinskaya, V. V. Emotsional'nye narusheniya v detskom vozraste i ikh korrektsiya. M.: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta, 1990. S. 54-55.
12. Lektorskii, V. A. Epistemologiya klassicheskaya i neklassicheskaya. M.: Editorial URSS, 2001. S. 19-31.
13. Mamardashvili, M. K. Filosofiya i lichnost' // Vystuplenie na Metodologicheskom seminare sektora filosofskikh problem psikhologii Instituta psikhologii RAN 3 marta 1977 goda. ChELOVEK. M., 1994. № 5. S. 5-19.
14. Moskovskogo shkol'nika zavalili laikami vo «VKontakte» posle posta ego mamy [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://lenta.ru/news/2016/04/19/like/ (data obrashcheniya: 05.05.2016)
15. Panferov, V. N. O roli vneshnosti v regulyatsii otnoshenii // Chelovek i obshchestvo. L.: Izd-vo LGU, 1968. Vyp. III. S. 235-240.
16. Penner, R. V. De re ad absurdum: problema identichnosti cheloveka v fenomene kospleya (onto-antropologicheskii analiz) // Sotsium i vlast'. 2016. № 3. S. 117-123.
17. Rozanov, V. V. Opavshie list'ya. Korob pervyi // Uedinennoe. M.: Politizdat, 1990. 387 s.
18. Sokolova, E. T. Samosoznanie i samootsenka pri anomaliyakh lichnosti. M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1989. 210 s.
19. Frank, S. L. Nepostizhimoe. Ontologicheskoe vvedenie v filosofiyu religii // Sochineniya. M.: Pravda, 1990. S. 370.
20. Frankl, V. Chelovek v poiskakh smysla. M.: Progress, 1990. 266 c.
21. Fromm, E. Begstvo ot svobody. M.: Progress, 1989. 256 s.
22. Khaidegger, M. Veshch' [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://filosof.historic.ru/books/item/f00/s00/z0000286/ (data obrashcheniya: 02.07.2016)
23. Khaidegger, M. Otreshennost' // Razgovor na proselochnoi doroge. M.: Vyssh. shk., 1991. 192 s.
24. Shafranskaya, K. D. Psikhologicheskie trudnosti obshcheniya lits s kosmeticheskimi defektami // Psikhologiya mezhlichnostnogo poznaniya. M.: Pedagogika, 1981. S. 212-221.
25. Prensky, M. Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants // On the Horizon. 2001. T. 9, № 5
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
|