Российский философ в поисках смыслов

Злотникова Татьяна Семеновна

doi:10.7256/2454-0757.2016.6.18290


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture

Reference:

Zlotnikova T. A Russian philosopher in search of meanings // Philosophy and Culture. 2016. № 6. P. 910-915. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2016.6.18290 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=18290

Российский философ в поисках смыслов

Zlotnikova Tatiana

Doctor of Art History

Professor, the department of Culturology, Yaroslavl State Pedagogical University named after K.D. Ushinsky

150000, Russia, Yaroslavl, Respublikanskaya Street 108

cij_yar@mail.ru

Other publications by this author

Article was published in rubric "The stream of books"

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2016.6.18290

Received:

10-03-2016

Published:

27-07-2016

Abstract: The subject of this research is the original intellectual discourse of the contemporary philosopher S. Nickolsky, pertaining to the Russian classical literature in the book “Horizons of Meanings. Philosophical Interpretations of Russian literature of the XIX-XX centuries”. The author determines the dominant of this discourse – the concept of the “Russian worldview”, as well as underlines the importance of understanding of the Russian writers as philosophers (from Goncharov to Platonov). The presented in the book system of signs or aspect of the Russian worldview, the main of which is considered the binary (including an opposition of “life/death) is being defined. The author notes the uniqueness of a conceptual approach towards Lermontov, Slavophiles, Herzen, Tolstoy, Platonov, and Akhmatova. The scientific novelty is defined by the polemics suggested by the author with regards to S. Nickolsy’s book. We start a dialogue with the author of the book concerning his assessment of the relations between the “writer” and the “power”, which he considers exceptional in the works of Platonov; with regards to recognition of Chekhov’s characters primarily positive or negative; with regards to the absence in the book of special parts dedicated to Pushkin, Gogol, and Gorky.

Keywords:

Philosophy, literature, meaning, Russia, outlook, binary, life, death, power, Nickolsky

References

1. Berdyaev N.A. O russkikh klassikakh. – M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1993. – 368 s.
2. Zlotnikova T.S. Vremya «Ch» (Kul'turnyi opyt A.P. Chekhova. A.P. Chekhov v kul'turnom opyte 1887-2007 gg.) Nauchnaya monografiya. M.-Yaroslavl': izd. YaGPU, 2007.-259 s.
3. Kondakov I.V. Kul'tura Rossii. Chast' 1. Russkaya kul'tura: kratkii ocherki istorii i teorii. – M.: Knizhnyi dom «Universitet», 2000. – S.56-62,208-216.
4. Nikol'skii S.A. Gorizonty smyslov. Filosofskie interpretatsii otechestvennoi literatury XIX-XX vv. – M.: Golos, 2015.-536 s.
5. Rozanov V.V. Legenda o Velikom inkvizitore F. M. Dostoevskogo. Literaturnye ocherki. O pisatelyakh i pisatel'stve. – M.: Respublika, 1996. – 702 s.

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.